TimeIsTight said:
As a Jersey Shore station, it is fine, except in parts of Tinton Falls, of course. But Queens and Brooklyn, as combined would make up the City with the largest population in the Country, that's a different story. It needs to be a Manhattan (New York County) signal at that point.
The 94.7 signal is stronger in Brooklyn than it is at the Jersey shore. Not only can you see all of Brooklyn from the West Orange transmitter site, it is closer.
Similar can be said from the South Orange train station. But I don't see that as a target audience.
[/quote]
You also have to remember that the transmitter power is just under 24-kw, as opposed to 6-kw for the ESB stations and the signals are line-of-sight in both cases. The center of Brooklyn is 8-miles from the ESB, and 18-miles from West Orange, but with four times the transmitter power.[/quote]
The 14 miles make a difference plus the height differential. Power is nice, but it does not make up for the shortfall East of ESB. Since ESB has >100kw from it at a much closer distance.
The picket fencing may be perceptually minimized by the processing, but it will certainly make a difference if the intention is for HD reception.
Since we do not know where the target audience will be in the short term, it is difficult to say whether West Orange will cut it or not.
You are looking at it in terms of the transmitter (looking at the radio). I am looking at it in terms of a listener because that is who will ultimately decide if the signal works for them or not.
My "signal vector" analogy sees point to point, not omnidirectionally. If the radio is seeing the signal omnidirectionally (they all do), then it is seeing multipath as well and the signal cancelling associated with it and it is then clobbered by the >100kw from ESB in areas of Queens and Brooklyn.
Jeff in Sa-ra-so-ta!