Pratte4Life said:Biz- I'll buy that.
But where is it written that therefore retirees must move to counter this hardship?
Boss- good info. Yes, almost all of the northeast is losing population. It ain't 1900 anymore.
I believe the problem isn't so much weather. People move to Montana and Colorado.
I actually saw where Rand McNally rated Pittsburgh as having better weather than Orlando. Remember, it's nicer here in the summer, and a snowstorm isn't anything compared to a hurricane. Plus it rains more in Orlando (HONEST!).
I believe the problem is political, but also cultural, and that is going to lead us back to the radio part of this discussion.
Has there ever been a city where more radio performers literally attacked the city? I'm not talking about legitimate criticism of Pittsburgh- "WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD WANT TO LIVE IN THE CITY WHEN IT MEANS GIVING THREE PERCENT OF THEIR INCOME TO CITY HALL? Call me at 412-555-TALK!"
I'm talking about Alan Cox complaining that there were too many rednecks around here.
I'm talking about Mark Madden saying that the town was a "City of Cowards" because he invited people into fights in the parking lot and nobody took him up on it.
I'm talking about John McIntire being, well, John McIntire.
There's always the thought that this comes back on the person giving the criticism winds up having it come back harder on them when such criticism comes off irresponsibly. The demise of the above trio's broadcasting careers is testament to this.
However, I do think it has a negative effect on the local culture that encourages "moving the he11 away."
On the encouragement of looking to other areas, would anyone say that Cleveland's population loss of 914,000 to 484,000 wasn't at all affected by the mindset caused when it's nickname went from being "The Best Location in the Nation" during the 914,000 era to "The Mistake on the Lake?"
I think it all boils down to what kind of life you want for yourself in your sunset years and how you intend to reach those goals.
Pittsburgh, because of its low cost of living, actually tends to ATTRACT older residents from other states where the cost of living is substantially higher. Someone who didn't save for the future and only has his house as his investment sells it for almost half a million there, comes to Pittsburgh and buys a small one for him and his wife for say, $50,000, boom...you've got all that money in the bank.
The tradeoff is, can you hack the weather here? Some can, others can't.
Getting back to the matter at hand, bearing this in mind, should we start programming stations to older demos? We shouldn't negate them, that's for sure...as long as you don't take it to the extreme. The doo-wop pre-British Invasion format ideas would fall into this category.
If you want that, you can pop in a CD of "Porky Chedwick Spins the Dusties" (I know it's not available on CD, but humor me here) and listen to it.
Most people I know who are 55 and older tune into stations like WSHH, 3WS or Y-108 for their music. They'll migrate to AM for talk and news. If they live outside of the city, they'll turn on the local AM/FM station if they have one in town that's worth listening to and gives them what they want.
There's always going to be a 25-54 female-dominant demographic in this town. What really makes the difference is how you skew your core.