I have heard a AC station play Taio Cruz - Dynamite and that station is Lite 100.5 WRCH.
imhomerjay said:If you test it and the target audience accepts it, where's the issue?
RDO said:imhomerjay said:If you test it and the target audience accepts it, where's the issue?
Then I think you should reconsider your postioning.
I don't see how anyone can listen to this mess. This isn't middle of the road. It's all over the road. And off in the ditch.carolinaradio said:I just thought I would add....this is a playlist from earlier today of a station I mentioned earlier, WSNY/Columbus, who is extremely traditional for an AC in 2011 (and from what I've heard online, a very good one).
vchimpanzee said:The stations calling themselves Lite which are more uptempo than the one in Miami really need to get rid of the name. And then we need stations to actually play Lite music--everywhere.
One reason is that this format is forced on us in stores and so-called professional offices. I was in one office hearing Rick James' "Super Freak". Unbelieveable. No, the station wasn't Lite but it was traditionally lighter than the one using the name. Across the steet a drug store was playing "Muskrat Love". I think I've mentioned the drug store in the Muzak topic. I spent some time on the phone with them and they finally said the music changes according to who surveys show is in the store at the time.
imhomerjay said:If you test it and the target audience accepts it, where's the issue?
imhomerjay said:If you test it and the target audience accepts it, where's the issue?
So many complaints about radio are along the lines of "safe, stale, predictable" et al, yet when a format continues to evolve to keep pace with the changing members of the target demo, it's going too far afield?
But on the "soft" stations, yes it does matter. I don't care how old the song is.semoochie said:"I Love Rock & Roll" was a huge hit in 1980! 31 years later, it doesn't matter how much edge it has, only that it doesn't turn off too many people in the demo.