I think a lot of the “issues” Audacy has had with the performance of some legacy stations since the Entercom/CBS deal was finalized is that they have to cut costs and adopt something like iHeart’s “hub and spoke” programming strategy, or something similar where there is centralized programming the individual stations pull from. Unfortunately for them, the changes they made were put in place entirely too fast and on too large of a scale in the case with the failed alternative experiment. Neither Entercom nor CBS utilized much voice tracking and neither had much of a central programming strategy. Both companies still had a lot of local staff that companies like iHeart and Cumulus cut ages ago. IHeart started with things like the Format Lab almost two decades ago and has been able to whittle down costs while not sacrificing station performance because they’ve had a long time to research and get it right.iHeart has more of a national programming strategy than Audacy. iHeart has Bobby Bones and the iHeartCountry festival. Those two things power the country format even in markets where they don't get great ratings (such as Boston). Audacy is a more traditional radio company, with a very limited national sales package. Audacy actually owns the top billing country station: KILT in Houston, but a lot of that station's revenue comes from its relationship with the Houston Texans football team.
Once the CBS/Entercom marriage was complete, they were left with a lot of expenses that had to be cut and I’m not sure if they can be faulted for some of their missteps. We see now where alternative is doing much better in Dallas since it has been handed over to a local PD, yet some of the cost synergies remain. While I think it’s quite hopeless, we now see them trying to do the same with KROQ. I think it’s definitely possible to cut costs while not crashing a station but it takes time.
Not that it would have changed anything, but I feel the time Entercom/Audacy took over WNSH was far from the best time for them to learn how to sell and program a difficult format in the country’s largest market. Cumulus had a lot invested in 94.7, Audacy did not.