That's accurate, but we will always have Florida. I consider that my own version of Purgatory, and I know I'm not alone.That could be because he's Jewish, and they don't believe in Hell.
That's accurate, but we will always have Florida. I consider that my own version of Purgatory, and I know I'm not alone.That could be because he's Jewish, and they don't believe in Hell.
Thanks for sharing. I don't see it that way. In that short segment, I don't "hear", at all, that what he said could be supportive of the potential banning of other religions. As an observant Jew, he is very familiar with the history of Jewish people, and his support of them is strong. The First Amendment was written to guarantee freedom of speech and the press. Other parts were there to make sure we wouldn't have a national religion. Our Founding Fathers based, on then, their recent history, knew that the new nation had to be open to all religions.He can say whatever he wants, but there's a lot of antisemitism among conservatives, and they often point to the owners of media and movie companies as being part of a conspiracy. His view that one religion "produced America" flies in the face of the many religions that existed in the colonies, the religious persecution those people experienced, and why the first amendment was written to prevent a national religion. A lot of what he's saying there fits with the white nationalists who want to ban other religions.
Thanks for sharing. I don't see it that way. In that short segment, I don't "hear", at all, that what he said could be supportive of the potential banning of other religions.
I don't know enough about him to say for certain, but I suspect some of his comments are structured the way they are for self-preservation. That could be his commercial viability in the right-wing media sphere, or even a fear that if he is more outspoken about his personal beliefs, he might become a target for some wingnut who gets too easily offended. We know there are at least a few of those folks out there, as the January 6th riot demonstrated.He can say whatever he wants, but there's a lot of antisemitism among conservatives, and they often point to the owners of media and movie companies as being part of a conspiracy. His view that one religion "produced America" flies in the face of the many religions that existed in the colonies, the religious persecution those people experienced, and why the first amendment was written to prevent a national religion. A lot of what he's saying there fits with the white nationalists who want to ban other religions.
You realize that, as do most of us in this discussion. Unfortunately there are a lot of people who identify as Christian Nationalist (or similar) who could use a refresher course in American History, government and civics. They don't understand or believe what you wrote.Thanks for sharing. I don't see it that way. In that short segment, I don't "hear", at all, that what he said could be supportive of the potential banning of other religions. As an observant Jew, he is very familiar with the history of Jewish people, and his support of them is strong. The First Amendment was written to guarantee freedom of speech and the press. Other parts were there to make sure we wouldn't have a national religion. Our Founding Fathers based, on then, their recent history, knew that the new nation had to be open to all religions.
Does he still have limited or no use of his limbs? Seems to me it would be very difficult to be on the radio without use of your hands.Bringing this back to radio, as far as I know, there has been no official word, or guestimate, on when Dennis Prager will return to his radio show.
Prager doesn't need to operate the equipment, he just speaks. Someone else can put the phone calls on the air as he requests them, as well as operate the board.Does he still have limited or no use of his limbs? Seems to me it would be very difficult to be on the radio without use of your hands.
Prager doesn't need to operate the equipment, he just speaks. Someone else can put the phone calls on the air as he requests them, as well as operate the board.
Yes, agreed. No voice, no show.A couple months ago he was on a ventilator. Hard to speak with a tube down your throat.
I have a friend who couldn't speak without having his hands available to move. I insisted one time he put his hands in his pockets and then make his point. He was literally unable to speak. All he could vocalize was "uhh....uhh....uhh" until he took the hands out of the pockets. (This is a guy with a genius IQ, BTW, so it's not a matter of intellect.) My friend is not alone in needing to use his hands as he talks.Yes, agreed. No voice, no show.
But the statement was being on the radio was "difficult ... without use of your hands"
Yes, agreed. No voice, no show.
But the statement was being on the radio was "difficult ... without use of your hands"
But the statement was being on the radio was "difficult ... without use of your hands"
Dennis Prager has of course been hosting talk radio as long as I've been alive, so maybe he can stroll into a room and just talk extemporaneously. I can't.
Is that a fellow whose last name is a forest animal?I follow a TV weatherman based in CA who does weather from his home studio for a Nebraska station, hes been unable to speak for awhile.. but has used A.I. to do the speaking parts for him.
Is that a fellow whose last name is a forest animal?
He is less than a mile from me. I hired him as PD of KRUX in the 60's when I was OM there (while at ASU). It took him another decade to find his calling in weather.Yup.. he's not far from you!