Talktalk said:
you can pick and choose the points you like and ignore the rest. You can also twist a story any way you like, but DE, you are the one who said you owned a station with DOUBLE the ratings of the number 2 station. If that was the case, you SHOULD have done what you could to garner 70% of the markets ad dollars, you could make the case that you deserved it.
First, as I have said twice before, the Top 15 market station where we had an average 14 share was not a facility I owned. I was GSM, Corporate Senior VP and in house Program Consultant.
Ad agencies (and that market was about 95% agency business) buy based on the rate vs. the delivery of audience in a campaign's target demographic. The way it works is that the agency determines a desired cost per ratings point, a total point goal, and a reach goal for the campaign. So, what the agency does is establish a value per listener that it enforces on all stations that want to get on the buy. So if a station has 0.5 rating points in the demo, they are paid 25% of what a station with two ratings points gets.
In other words, the playing field is nearly level. Stations that get high power ratios do so for one of two reasions: they have more inventory (news and talk) or they have audience concentrated in the demographic groups that are most called for by agencies. Country and AC get better ratios than CHR, and Black and Hispanic get lower ratios than all of these... because of the demographic delivery and the number of buys that come up for the audience each station delivers.
Back to the station I ran. We got twice the rate of the #2 station, but both of us got the same cost per point If our CPP would have been higher, then the agencies would have bought around us... which is what they do when stations can not meet the ofgfered costs.
Tell me, what markets where YOU could own a station has 120 stations in the market? What market in the country has 120 stations?
Market 13, Puerto Rico. Over 120 stations, Arbitron meassured for nearly 10 years.
I never said HKS should have a 4 or 5 power ratio, they don't have double the ratings of the number 2 station.
Power ratios are based on the relationship of your share of audience to the share of revenue you garner from those numbers. A station with a 5 share should get 5% of the billing, or a 1 power ratio. Of course, a station with a 2.5 share can also get a 1 power ratio by getting 2.5% of market billing.
The relationship of one station to another in ratings has zero to do with power ratio. It is the relationship of each station's market share of audience with its market share of revenue.
This market is far more compressed. The ticket makes a higher power ratio in spite of their higher numbers because they creativly sell their station.
No, that is not so. The ticket gets a high ratio because it delivers a very salable demo, with little spillage, which ad agencies want. It is enhanced by the fact that they get sports marketing dollars that do not come out of general market ad budgets, but out of marketing budgets.
And, how can you say that they get sports marketing dollars, they have had high power ratios for years, long before the Cowboy deal, and they will be better off without it.
Get back to us when you understand what sports marketing dollars are.
The deal with the cowboys is a bad one where the Cowboys get most of the revenue, not the station.
That's pretty much normal for play by play. The station does it for the listener image enhancement and the ancillary sales opportunities. It's the same reason why supermarkets put things on sale, called "loss leaders" where they make no money yet draw traffic into the store. Or why Toys 'r Us for 3 decades sold Pampers at a loss just to build traffric...