<<"A lot has changed in those 34 years.">>
And I worked in the business for 32 of them, rolling with all the "changes". One thing has not changed: the adage "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Is it really broke?
<< (Me):It truly is a "stand alone" product regardless of the station that exists around it.
(You

The very words that are another reason that todays programmers are less inclined to use it.>>
Or...maybe it will attract listeners who wouldn't ordinarily listen to a Classic Rock format, but are within the target demographic. What is the age difference between those who listen to Classic Rock, and "Lost 45s" anyway? This is a specialty show on a Sunday night, fer cryin' out loud.
<< "Or....a new management comes in that understands the new challenges of the marketplace and PPM. And new management didn't act immediately. They have probably been looking at research and focus groups for the last year before making the decision.">>
The key word here is "probably". But isn't it stated in an earlier post that it was determined that the show "didn't fit" the rest of the station? Either that was their sole reasoning, or ratings and revenue didn't justify keeping it. I've worked with plenty of New Management From Out Of Town types who totally missed the uniqueness of the Boston radio market. For example: at one station, the GM (from NYC) would constantly complain about the tightness of commercial sets--he wanted one-second pauses between spots. He soon learned that was a "New York Thing", after scanning the dial and hearing that "that's how we do things here", and relented to permitting the usual.
<<One of the things that you either miss...or dismiss...is that the audience that likes Barry's show and selections might NOT like the stations format...and vice versa. The 'regular format' and Barry's show might have polar audiences....working against each other. (Circular firing squad, death spiral, stop digging to get out of a hole...use any analogy you want). It's folly to think of "Sunday Night" as an island all to itself. That's old-line thinking. >>
And just maybe, that car radio or home radio that was tuned to Barry Scott the night before will be turned on and tuned in to Loren & Wally in the morning, and those same folks, of the same age, (how can that possibly be "polar"?) might find a new morning show of their liking? Sunday nights and AM Drive are hardly the same thing, but apparently someone upstairs thinks the Sunday night time slot is SO important, that they're willing to toss an audience who might not otherwise sample their product? HOW is that "old-line thinking?"
<<My thoughts are that you are summarily dismissive of proven executives with tons of research, tons of experiences, other market experience and have been successful programming in the new media environment......all based on your "gut'?>>
No, based on experience, trial and error, success and failure. One thing remains constant, and that is that on Sunday nights, cumes are lower than most other dayparts. Specialty shows are a way to counter that. How many Barry Scott listeners are going to fire up their computers instead to hear the show? That remains to be seen. Just like all those people who threw out their radios when Stern and O&A moved to satellite, right? Program in the "new media" environment by being innovative and different. If the numbers and dollars are showing in the daypart, leave it alone! Otherwise, that's the ONLY reason to consider a change. Your station image is not going to be hurt by one weekly specialty show on Sunday night. I cannot think of a case where that has ever happened, either.