• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

He's Seen the Future and its HD RADIO!

Chuck said:
I don’t see how it is necessary to require that a person has to physically be at the station if a means is in place to originate emergency information from a remote site. With simple to implement (and inexpensive) remote control systems, it would be easy enough to have a person "on call" to handle those duties, if and when they are needed. I do agree that someone should be on call, but I’ve found I don't need to actually be at the station to go on the air. I can do it from just about anywhere, including my kitchen. I've even done it from a ship at sea. If a lowly LPFM like mine can figure it out, so can the big guys.

I don't know about you, but I'm not really at my best at 4AM when the phone rings. Are you ready to take appropriate action if disaster strikes your community right after you've been awakened from a deep sleep?

Chuck said:
The problem with this particular desire to have a warm body at the station 24/7 is that it won't be something a lot of smaller stations can afford to do. Many of them will just sign off at 10 or midnight. That’s the way it was back in the 1950s & 60's. How does that help?

At the very least, people won't be lulled into false security. If the tornado is bearing down and the station is off the air, at least the tornado victim's last thought won't be "why didn't the people at the radio station warn me?" If the station isn't on, people won't be expecting emergency info from it.

Chuck said:
I can think of a small station that is operated by a senior citizens group. They do a pretty good job during the day, but I doubt that many of them stay awake past 9:00 PM. I guess they'd just have to go off the air after 9:00. I don't see how that serves the public interest. For that matter how does it foster localism?

Maybe every Tom, Dick and Harry shouldn't be operating a radio station. If you can't meet a minimum set of requirements for disseminating appropriate information in times of crisis, you shouldn't be on the air. I'm from tornado country. Most of them come when stations are automated these days. All too often, tornados wreak havoc while the music plays on.

Chuck said:
I’m in favor of localism, but this in itself will not make it happen. Instead, you will either get “nothing” because the station signed off, or at best there will be a $6.00 per hour person sitting there watching the automation. That’s assuming they haven’t nodded off to go to sleep.

A $6.00 per hour person can at the very least sound the alarm appropriately, and at worst go on the air and convey information. Maybe not with enough polish, but people will have some idea that something serious is happening. Heaven forbid the overnight shift should turn into a training ground for young talent again! Somehow, the first station I ever cracked a mic at was able to afford my meager salary. Today, as part of a consolidated cluster of stations, that station bills more than it ever did back then. You can't make me believe radio can't "afford" it. This was a market just inside the top 200. Today, stations in the top 10 can't "afford" midday or night jocks? What's wrong with this picture?

Chuck said:
If you like the way the FCC is running things, how do you feel about “Radio Goldfield,” the Nevada pirate that became licensed after proper political pressure was exerted on the Commission.? The guy may be doing a great job of serving his community. I hope so, but the point is the FCC is being run by politicians, not by engineers. Not many of your elected officials have a clue when it comes to nuts and bolts technology. Every now and then, someone persuades Congress that they are electrical engineers and we get another fine mess. Lord knows what they are dong in the Telecom field, but every FCC Daily Digest is loaded with news about the latest giveaways and edicts. It makes me shudder to think about it.

Yeah, the whole "Radio Goldfield" debacle is sad. I have to guess the Commission as a whole wasn't thrilled, but it wasn't worth the fight to them. I'm personally glad Chairman Martin is now bucking Congress. They call the Commission's recent actions "arrogant" but all too often I find myself wondering why Congress has their hands in EVERYTHING. How much taxpayer money was spent on the MLB steroids investigation?
 
Radioman100 said:
I don't know about you, but I'm not really at my best at 4AM when the phone rings. Are you ready to take appropriate action if disaster strikes your community right after you've been awakened from a deep sleep.

Well, I've done it. Hurricane Rita passed directly over us. We stayed on the air when most full power stations were knocked off the air. Being small has its advantages. We ran for two days on a propane powered generator before power was restored. We got a lot of compliments about it.

Radioman100 said:
At the very least, people won't be lulled into false security. If the tornado is bearing down and the station is off the air, at least the tornado victim's last thought won't be "why didn't the people at the radio station warn me?" If the station isn't on, people won't be expecting emergency info from it.

What is the difference if a station is off the air, or if it doesn't broadcast anything local? NEITHER are a reliable source of information. A more positive thing to do would be to fix the EAS system. It needs a lot of help.


Radioman100 said:
Maybe every Tom, Dick and Harry shouldn't be operating a radio station. If you can't meet a minimum set of requirements for disseminating appropriate information in times of crisis, you shouldn't be on the air. I'm from tornado country. Most of them come when stations are automated these days. All too often, tornados wreak havoc while the music plays on.

Yes, they even do that in Dallas. Been there, done that. The music played on.

Radioman100 said:
Yeah, the whole "Radio Goldfield" debacle is sad. I have to guess the Commission as a whole wasn't thrilled, but it wasn't worth the fight to them. I'm personally glad Chairman Martin is now bucking Congress. They call the Commission's recent actions "arrogant" but all too often I find myself wondering why Congress has their hands in EVERYTHING. How much taxpayer money was spent on the MLB steroids investigation?

That's a good question. A lot of what Congress spends money on is a complete waste of your tax dollars. I think things like the MLB investigation is more or less a "red herring" used to distract the public from what is really going on. Having hard core news sources distract us about Brittany's underwear, or lack thereof isn't enough.
 
Oh, I agree with you Chuck that it's absolutely appalling that it would happen in Dallas. The recent layoffs at KHKS are what I was talking about when I mentioned top 10 market stations not being able to "afford" midday and overnight talent. A market leading station needs to cut out air talent? C'mon!

The difference between a hurricane and a tornado is response time. You have time to respond to and prepare for a hurricane. You may get some warning in the form of a tornado watch before one forms, but very little real warning before one touches down. You could say, just staff the station when there's a tornado watch out. In parts of Texas, that could be every night. People become numb to it, and since there isn't staff allocated to that task, their sleep patterns would be disrupted. They're not going to stay up just because a tornado watch is in effect. Simply not gonna happen.

Regardless, I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. My position is simple. If a station is broadcasting, there needs to be a warm body in the studio.
 
I agree. If you can't keep a person in the studios, or at the very worst nights and weekends able to get there in just a VERY few minutes when there's an emergency, then you should turn in your license. SOMEONE should be reachable 24/7/365. We are still licensed to operate IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST! Can't see your way clear to doing that? PLEASE let someone have the license who will!
 
Mike Walker said:
I agree. If you can't keep a person in the studios, or at the very worst nights and weekends able to get there in just a VERY few minutes when there's an emergency, then you should turn in your license. SOMEONE should be reachable 24/7/365. We are still licensed to operate IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST! Can't see your way clear to doing that? PLEASE let someone have the license who will!

Ya know guys, there are a few loonies out there that think HD is designed to squeeze out the little guy. I suspect most people realize how foolish this is.

I DO believe the 24 hour staffing requirement is the end of the line for small town guys.

I'll bet the fallout of this is many stations move "OFF SITE" during night hours. And then during ALL hours. I see the waiver of this rule being abused BIG TIME. And yes you'll have to be able to get a waiver.

Clouseau
 
clouseau said:
Mike Walker said:
I agree. If you can't keep a person in the studios, or at the very worst nights and weekends able to get there in just a VERY few minutes when there's an emergency, then you should turn in your license. SOMEONE should be reachable 24/7/365. We are still licensed to operate IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST! Can't see your way clear to doing that? PLEASE let someone have the license who will!

Ya know guys, there are a few loonies out there that think HD is designed to squeeze out the little guy. I suspect most people realize how foolish this is.

I DO believe the 24 hour staffing requirement is the end of the line for small town guys.

I'll bet the fallout of this is many stations move "OFF SITE" during night hours. And then during ALL hours. I see the waiver of this rule being abused BIG TIME. And yes you'll have to be able to get a waiver.

Clouseau

Whether it's intent was to squeeze out the little guy or not, that will be it's effect especially on AM. You've got the big 50KW stations clearing 30 khz swaths throughout half the country at night and there are a lot of smaller stations on those sideband's frequencys that get clobbered at night, they then lose their advertising revenue, how are they going to survive? Case in point WSYL 1040 gets clobbered in it's own protected contour by WBZ 1030, maybe that's part of the reason for the suit? WCKY 1530 Cincinnati at times covers up WWKB 1520 here in MA and it is twice as far as Buffalo, what's wrong with this picture? What is going to happen heaven forbid if all the AM station start using the iBlock machine? No one will listen to AM at all as it will be one big buzzing, whooshing mess of sideband noise from one end to the other with a few close stations occasionally poking through the mess.
 
Mike Walker said:
I agree. If you can't keep a person in the studios, or at the very worst nights and weekends able to get there in just a VERY few minutes when there's an emergency, then you should turn in your license. SOMEONE should be reachable 24/7/365. We are still licensed to operate IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST! Can't see your way clear to doing that? PLEASE let someone have the license who will!

Believe it or not, I can actually do that. The station is located about 350 feet from my house. I also have the ability to remote control it from my laptop computer anywhere I can get an Internet connection. That includes anywhere in my home, but with my EVDO card, it isn't all that hard to get connected from a lot of places. Failing that I can call an unlisted phone number, enter a code and go on the air live from the phone. It doesn’t sound very “Hi-Fi but it is still very effective if the tornado is visible on the horizon.

Several of our volunteers have the ability to do this as do the local law enforcement folks. I think that is pretty reachable considering the size of the station. Our annual operating budget would just barely purchase a modestly equipped Kia or Hyundai.

There is a big difference in having someone available who can handle the situation and requiring that someone sits there doing nothing at the station "just in case." Most small stations can't afford that, so they will simply sign off. That means their EAS will also be broadcasting to nowhere. I don't see how that is much of an improvement.

In metro's like Radioman's Dallas area, I think it is reasonable that someone should be around at all hours. Most stations are clusters and if the folks who own them can't pay someone to be around then there really is a problem. One person could easily oversee several stations that are housed in the same building. Most stations around here lock the doors at 6:00 on Friday for the weekend. Nobody is home. Same goes for nights and weekends. I doubt there is a station in East Texas that isn’t either automated or taking a satellite feed over night. I doubt that is unique to my area. That’s why it might be more to the point to fix EAS so it really works well. It can’t be that hard and everyone would benefit. Right now it is a lame attempt at best. If the Government is serious about Homeland Security, then this should be a priority, and they need to actually pay someone to coordinate and run it. Right now it is manned by a bunch of well intended volunteers. They can only do so much with no resources.

Requiring an overnight and weekend person may be fine in many situations, but I doubt it will be doable for the thousands of smaller stations, including the few remaining "Mom & Pop's," NCE's, LPFM's and other small broadcasters. There is life below 100,000 watts.
 
Chuck said:
Requiring an overnight and weekend person may be fine in many situations, but I doubt it will be doable for the thousands of smaller stations, including the few remaining "Mom & Pop's," NCE's, LPFM's and other small broadcasters. There is life below 100,000 watts.

How do you feel about Amarillo, Corpus Christi, El Paso, Lubbock, McAllen-Brownsville, Midland-Odessa, Tyler-Longview or Waco?

Before deregulation, every FM station in these towns somehow managed to pay someone to work every daypart. I started my career in one of them doing overnights many years ago.

The towns have grown, and radio revenue has grown in all of these markets as well. Now, suddenly they "can't afford" to pay talent in the daytime, much less at night? That just doesn't make any sense.

I have nothing against station owners making money, but a broadcast license should carry some responsibilities. These days, it's amazing to me how few people have actually figured out how we're duping them with voicetracking. Every time I explain to someone outside the business how it works, you should see the looks on their faces. They're dumbfounded. The public takes it for granted that someone is at the station, and they think it's the DJ they're hearing.

I'm with Mike Walker. If your broadcasting company can't "afford" live talent around the clock, your licenses should be given to someone who is willing to utilize live talent. I assure you, there would be PLENTY of takers for every FM in the towns I listed above if it became a requirement to operate and the current licensees just couldn't "afford" it. Voicetracking should be outlawed. It is designed to deceive the public that stations are supposed to serve, and lulls them into a false sense of security in the event of emergencies. At the very least, stations that are voicetracked should be required to air a warning of some minimum length (say, 10 seconds - alongside the legal ID perhaps) that lets the public know the station is voicetracked and nobody is there. Would that be an acceptable compromise? Mom and Pop stations in unrated markets wouldn't be financially penalized, and the big conglomerates would have a big incentive to utilize live talent and stop the deception.

Gee... Does everyone still think I'm a "corporate radio apologist?"
 
Well, I am in the Tyler-Longview market. Most stations are voice tracked or automated quite a bit of the time. Several are live at drive time; a few are live during the day. Quite a few are voice tracked, satellite delivered or automated all of the time.

Truth be known, FM has been automated for a very long time. Remember the Schaefer automation systems? There was nothing at the station but several racks of Ampex or Scully tape decks and either a carousel cart machine, or even worse, a "Gates 55" which could eat Fdelipac carts faster than you could load them. Despite the primitive technology, some of those stations were pretty good and were responsive to their communities.

I can agree that voice tracking borders on deception. It tries to make you think that the talent is local. It isn't. They aren't giving out "800" numbers for contests just for the listener's convenience. It's because the talent is in Dallas, New York or elsewhere. I have a problem with that. I have no idea who you work for, but if it is a Dallas cluster, I'll bet that voice tracking is "the way it is." It is very efficient way to send the same program to multiple stations, but it certainly doesn't make it "local."

I'm not very happy with the way radio has evolved. It is a far cry from the way it was in the 1950’s, 60’s and 70’s. That is one of the primary reasons why I've spent the last five years of my life involved in community radio. It is a lot of work. Thanks to technology, we are able to deliver a fairly decent product on a shoestring. A lot of people are very happy that we are here. A few are not, since they look upon us as competition. The truth is many of our listeners had given up on radio entirely. We've actually brought some people back to radio, which is good for everybody.

Without automation, it would be next to impossible to pull this off. Sorry, but that is a reality. I'd love to have 24/7 live talent. I just don't see that happening with the constraints we are forced to live with. Sometimes, you do the best you can with the tools you have to work for. I don't make any apologies for being automated. I also make no pretense that we are anything but automated. We’ve even tagged EAS announcements with statements encouraging people to tune in to local TV stations for more up to date emergency weather information. I doubt that many radio stations in Dallas would do that, but the people I’m talking to are my friends and neighbors, and they deserve a straight answer.
 
Chuck said:
Well, I am in the Tyler-Longview market. Most stations are voice tracked or automated quite a bit of the time. Several are live at drive time; a few are live during the day. Quite a few are voice tracked, satellite delivered or automated all of the time.

Truth be known, FM has been automated for a very long time. Remember the Schaefer automation systems? There was nothing at the station but several racks of Ampex or Scully tape decks and either a carousel cart machine, or even worse, a "Gates 55" which could eat Fdelipac carts faster than you could load them. Despite the primitive technology, some of those stations were pretty good and were responsive to their communities.

I can agree that voice tracking borders on deception. It tries to make you think that the talent is local. It isn't. They aren't giving out "800" numbers for contests just for the listener's convenience. It's because the talent is in Dallas, New York or elsewhere. I have a problem with that. I have no idea who you work for, but if it is a Dallas cluster, I'll bet that voice tracking is "the way it is." It is very efficient way to send the same program to multiple stations, but it certainly doesn't make it "local."

I'm not very happy with the way radio has evolved. It is a far cry from the way it was in the 1950’s, 60’s and 70’s. That is one of the primary reasons why I've spent the last five years of my life involved in community radio. It is a lot of work. Thanks to technology, we are able to deliver a fairly decent product on a shoestring. A lot of people are very happy that we are here. A few are not, since they look upon us as competition. The truth is many of our listeners had given up on radio entirely. We've actually brought some people back to radio, which is good for everybody.

Without automation, it would be next to impossible to pull this off. Sorry, but that is a reality. I'd love to have 24/7 live talent. I just don't see that happening with the constraints we are forced to live with. Sometimes, you do the best you can with the tools you have to work for. I don't make any apologies for being automated. I also make no pretense that we are anything but automated. We’ve even tagged EAS announcements with statements encouraging people to tune in to local TV stations for more up to date emergency weather information. I doubt that many radio stations in Dallas would do that, but the people I’m talking to are my friends and neighbors, and they deserve a straight answer.

I never had the pleasure of working with a Schaefer type automation system, though I have had the displeasure of hauling a few off.

There have always been stations that were intent on doing things cheaper, but I have to think any of the major players in the markets I listed would have been using live talent on their FMs by the early 80s at least. One station in my hometown used a Shaefer system and a Drake-Chenault type CHR format with live jocks, but the others were all cart and vinyl, then cart exclusively, then cart and CD. There was one station that ran an automated easy listening format into the late 80s, but it never did much in the Arb. All the stations that anyone would remember, all the stations that made money were live.

I can see why automation was popular in the early days of FM, just as it's popular now in the early days of HD2.

Chuck, I can understand why you as an LPFM guy wouldn't want to staff your operation around the clock. It would be financially devestating, but despite their assertions to the contrary, it would not be financially devestating to the average cluster in any rated Arbitron market. Unpopular with radio CEOs and stockholders? Yes, but it's the right thing to do for the industry and for listeners. Taking calls from listeners is operating in the public interest. Whether it's to answer a question about a spot they heard on your station, or they're asking what song played last, or what time the public service event you're promoting for the weekend starts, this type of stuff is important. If it's important enough to your listeners to call about it, there should be someone there to answer the phone.
 
Radioman100 said:
Chuck, I can understand why you as an LPFM guy wouldn't want to staff your operation around the clock. It would be financially devestating, but despite their assertions to the contrary, it would not be financially devestating to the average cluster in any rated Arbitron market. Unpopular with radio CEOs and stockholders? Yes, but it's the right thing to do for the industry and for listeners. Taking calls from listeners is operating in the public interest. Whether it's to answer a question about a spot they heard on your station, or they're asking what song played last, or what time the public service event you're promoting for the weekend starts, this type of stuff is important. If it's important enough to your listeners to call about it, there should be someone there to answer the phone.

I agree with you about the ability of a cluster to have someone at the station. It amazes me how many don't do that, even in big markets like Dallas. I also lament the loss of live people in broadcasting. Those personalities have contributed greatly to radio’s success. These days, even if someone is in the control room, they are often just reading liner cards. It is not the same thing. Be thankful that there are still a few personalities out there.

It is Saturday and I’m at the station right now. The phone has rung quite a few times this morning with calls wanting to know about a cat that was featured on our “Humane Society Pet of the Week." or what time the Cowboy game is on. Despite the fact that we don’t air the game, I gave the gentleman the information. Other people have called today just to talk or get off their chest whatever it is that’s bothering them. Christmas is a high stress time of year. I think I’ve only had one song request out of maybe 10 calls.

More frequently than not, people tell me that we are the only radio station in telephone book that actually answered the phone, especially at night or on weekends. They sometimes are very frustrated by that. In fact, it is difficult for many people to call a radio station because they don’t know how it is listed. Sometimes, it’s simply not in their particular local phone book. In this case, Tyler, Longview and Kilgore all have their own books. Most stations are not listed in all or any of them, or if they are, it’s under “XYZ Radio Group.” The public doesn’t know who “XYZ Radio Group” is, and even if they did, it wouldn’t do a lot of good, because the cluster was recently sold and now is listed as “LMNOP Media.”

Truthfully, we don't answer the phone either when nobody is here. I could call forward it, but instead choose to use an answering machine. Dealing with a drunk at 2 AM who wants to know “What day is Willie Nelson's birthday?” is not my cup of tea. Still, you'd think that other stations in the area would have someone around. I guess not.

The problem about asking your government to impose a regulation is they are likely to come up with something that is a "one size fits all" approach. The problem isn’t that simple. I would hope that Clear Channel, CBS, Citadel, Cumulus, etc could afford to man their stations over night, even if they are automated. I'm not sure that very many small broadcasters can do that. As Clouseau pointed out, requiring small stations to be manned at all times is a much bigger threat to the viability of those stations than IBOC poses.

Even though many of us are not wild about voice tracking, satellite delivery or even automation, the reality is it will be with us for a long time. It will be with us until someone thinks of a cheaper way to do it, or people simply stop listening to radio. In either case, I predict that will be a long time. I think it is best to accept it as a fact of life and figure out how to make the best of it.

A much more positive approach would be to fix the EAS System. That would be a lot easier, and everyone would benefit. Right now EAS relies on a daisy chain system of volunteers where just about anything can (and does) go wrong. The daisy chain could easily be replaced with a network of low tech VHF transmitters that were 24/7 accessible by local law enforcement and safety authorities. This could be operated by a central statewide dispatch center that is manned 24/7 by people who are paid and trained to properly use it. They in turn would have the ability to automatically interrupt the signal of any or all radio stations in a given area, or state wide, if that is what the situation merited. It could be very simple, but very effective. I would cheerfully participate.
 
Chuck said:
I agree with you about the ability of a cluster to have someone at the station. It amazes me how many don't do that, even in big markets like Dallas. I also lament the loss of live people in broadcasting. Those personalities have contributed greatly to radio’s success. These days, even if someone is in the control room, they are often just reading liner cards. It is not the same thing. Be thankful that there are still a few personalities out there.

It is Saturday and I’m at the station right now. The phone has rung quite a few times this morning with calls wanting to know about a cat that was featured on our “Humane Society Pet of the Week." or what time the Cowboy game is on. Despite the fact that we don’t air the game, I gave the gentleman the information. Other people have called today just to talk or get off their chest whatever it is that’s bothering them. Christmas is a high stress time of year. I think I’ve only had one song request out of maybe 10 calls.

More frequently than not, people tell me that we are the only radio station in telephone book that actually answered the phone, especially at night or on weekends. They sometimes are very frustrated by that. In fact, it is difficult for many people to call a radio station because they don’t know how it is listed. Sometimes, it’s simply not in their particular local phone book. In this case, Tyler, Longview and Kilgore all have their own books. Most stations are not listed in all or any of them, or if they are, it’s under “XYZ Radio Group.” The public doesn’t know who “XYZ Radio Group” is, and even if they did, it wouldn’t do a lot of good, because the cluster was recently sold and now is listed as “LMNOP Media.”

Truthfully, we don't answer the phone either when nobody is here. I could call forward it, but instead choose to use an answering machine. Dealing with a drunk at 2 AM who wants to know “What day is Willie Nelson's birthday?” is not my cup of tea. Still, you'd think that other stations in the area would have someone around. I guess not.

The problem about asking your government to impose a regulation is they are likely to come up with something that is a "one size fits all" approach. The problem isn’t that simple. I would hope that Clear Channel, CBS, Citadel, Cumulus, etc could afford to man their stations over night, even if they are automated. I'm not sure that very many small broadcasters can do that. As Clouseau pointed out, requiring small stations to be manned at all times is a much bigger threat to the viability of those stations than IBOC poses.

Even though many of us are not wild about voice tracking, satellite delivery or even automation, the reality is it will be with us for a long time. It will be with us until someone thinks of a cheaper way to do it, or people simply stop listening to radio. In either case, I predict that will be a long time. I think it is best to accept it as a fact of life and figure out how to make the best of it.

A much more positive approach would be to fix the EAS System. That would be a lot easier, and everyone would benefit. Right now EAS relies on a daisy chain system of volunteers where just about anything can (and does) go wrong. The daisy chain could easily be replaced with a network of low tech VHF transmitters that were 24/7 accessible by local law enforcement and safety authorities. This could be operated by a central statewide dispatch center that is manned 24/7 by people who are paid and trained to properly use it. They in turn would have the ability to automatically interrupt the signal of any or all radio stations in a given area, or state wide, if that is what the situation merited. It could be very simple, but very effective. I would cheerfully participate.
You know, Chuck, what is odd is the actual RESISTANCE to doing this. In the last configuration of my current job, we had 4 FMs and an AM in the building. Everyone but the CHR was out of there at 6:00 PM. Our sports AM had a night board op from time to time, but that was strictly for the AM. They occasionally board op'ed call ins on one or more of the FMs while there for AM. (My Suggestion to save group money)

I (Foolishly apparently) suggested that we should have either traffic or the engineer work from 10P to 6A. The Bookkeeper was also on the list. Someone who could do a walk thru of the 5 stations every 15 minutes or so and make sure a computer didn't lock up, etc... About once a month I would get a call at about 8:00 or so in the morning that my AM or my FM was off the air (Read that as Not producing any programming.) This despite having humanity in the bldg starting at 5:00 AM. Both of my responsibilities ran syndicated morning shows. The FM jock who sdid a minute of news via an audio file for me didin't usually even see if MY station was "on the air". After all, HE was a star... :)

The idea of an overnight "Caretaker" was rejected, even though the engineer loved it and I went on a "Everyone in the building is responsible for every station when you're here" campaign. Groups COULD eat this additional responsibility. As a stand alone AM, now, I suspect we'll have to locate at a local convienence store and then send in our studio programming via remote control. We'll find a work around, but it'll be BS. Or maybe we'll just sell out to a cluster. God only knows if we priced ourselves reasonably, we'd be outta here.

I love the concept of what we call "Stupid Money".

That is, we're not for sale... unless you want to pay stupid money...


Serious Job Security.

Clouseau
 
<dev> null

<dev> null
 
clouseau said:
You know, Chuck, what is odd is the actual RESISTANCE to doing this.

You are right; there is major resistance to the idea. Even though it is the little stations that will be hurt the most by this, it seems to be the large clusters who are moaning the most.
 
Chuck said:
clouseau said:
You know, Chuck, what is odd is the actual RESISTANCE to doing this.

You are right; there is major resistance to the idea. Even though it is the little stations that will be hurt the most by this, it seems to be the large clusters who are moaning the most.

It's throwing good money after bad. EAS is and always has been a joke. Whatever replaces it will probably be another expensive joke.
 
Radioman100 said:
It's throwing good money after bad. EAS is and always has been a joke. Whatever replaces it will probably be another expensive joke.

I'm sure you are correct. That's why I say be careful about what you want your government to do for you. You may be the guy who has to deal with the latest edict.
 
Chuck said:
Radioman100 said:
It's throwing good money after bad. EAS is and always has been a joke. Whatever replaces it will probably be another expensive joke.

I'm sure you are correct. That's why I say be careful about what you want your government to do for you. You may be the guy who has to deal with the latest edict.

Ha! Well, we agree on that! Truth be told, it's a lot easier to get things done in a studio when there are no jocks around, but I'd gladly put up with that hassle to have a few more of 'em.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom