R
Radioman100
Guest
Chuck said:I don’t see how it is necessary to require that a person has to physically be at the station if a means is in place to originate emergency information from a remote site. With simple to implement (and inexpensive) remote control systems, it would be easy enough to have a person "on call" to handle those duties, if and when they are needed. I do agree that someone should be on call, but I’ve found I don't need to actually be at the station to go on the air. I can do it from just about anywhere, including my kitchen. I've even done it from a ship at sea. If a lowly LPFM like mine can figure it out, so can the big guys.
I don't know about you, but I'm not really at my best at 4AM when the phone rings. Are you ready to take appropriate action if disaster strikes your community right after you've been awakened from a deep sleep?
Chuck said:The problem with this particular desire to have a warm body at the station 24/7 is that it won't be something a lot of smaller stations can afford to do. Many of them will just sign off at 10 or midnight. That’s the way it was back in the 1950s & 60's. How does that help?
At the very least, people won't be lulled into false security. If the tornado is bearing down and the station is off the air, at least the tornado victim's last thought won't be "why didn't the people at the radio station warn me?" If the station isn't on, people won't be expecting emergency info from it.
Chuck said:I can think of a small station that is operated by a senior citizens group. They do a pretty good job during the day, but I doubt that many of them stay awake past 9:00 PM. I guess they'd just have to go off the air after 9:00. I don't see how that serves the public interest. For that matter how does it foster localism?
Maybe every Tom, Dick and Harry shouldn't be operating a radio station. If you can't meet a minimum set of requirements for disseminating appropriate information in times of crisis, you shouldn't be on the air. I'm from tornado country. Most of them come when stations are automated these days. All too often, tornados wreak havoc while the music plays on.
Chuck said:I’m in favor of localism, but this in itself will not make it happen. Instead, you will either get “nothing” because the station signed off, or at best there will be a $6.00 per hour person sitting there watching the automation. That’s assuming they haven’t nodded off to go to sleep.
A $6.00 per hour person can at the very least sound the alarm appropriately, and at worst go on the air and convey information. Maybe not with enough polish, but people will have some idea that something serious is happening. Heaven forbid the overnight shift should turn into a training ground for young talent again! Somehow, the first station I ever cracked a mic at was able to afford my meager salary. Today, as part of a consolidated cluster of stations, that station bills more than it ever did back then. You can't make me believe radio can't "afford" it. This was a market just inside the top 200. Today, stations in the top 10 can't "afford" midday or night jocks? What's wrong with this picture?
Chuck said:If you like the way the FCC is running things, how do you feel about “Radio Goldfield,” the Nevada pirate that became licensed after proper political pressure was exerted on the Commission.? The guy may be doing a great job of serving his community. I hope so, but the point is the FCC is being run by politicians, not by engineers. Not many of your elected officials have a clue when it comes to nuts and bolts technology. Every now and then, someone persuades Congress that they are electrical engineers and we get another fine mess. Lord knows what they are dong in the Telecom field, but every FCC Daily Digest is loaded with news about the latest giveaways and edicts. It makes me shudder to think about it.
Yeah, the whole "Radio Goldfield" debacle is sad. I have to guess the Commission as a whole wasn't thrilled, but it wasn't worth the fight to them. I'm personally glad Chairman Martin is now bucking Congress. They call the Commission's recent actions "arrogant" but all too often I find myself wondering why Congress has their hands in EVERYTHING. How much taxpayer money was spent on the MLB steroids investigation?