M
Mike Walker
Guest
People still don't know what HD Radio IS. It's a misleading (and unfortunate) name. The marketing for it has been silly...leading people to believe they've already heard it. And market researchers are ASKING THE WRONG THINGS. If you ask someone "have you heard of HD radio?" and they've heard one of the stupid promos, they'll likely say "yes". It's also likely that they'll say "yes" they've HEARD HD Radio, just because they've heard a promo...or perhaps confused it with HDTV.
Know how to tell if they REALLY know what the hell it is? ASK THEM TO EXPLAIN TO YOU WHAT HD RADIO IS! Almost none till be able to explain it, or what it offers that analog doesn't (hell, for years millions think they've already had "digital radio" because of the digital displays. I said in the 80s "a time will come when they regret calling these damn things "digital"...when there's nothing digital about the AUDIO!) HD is at the beginning, and frankly the rollout effort has stumbled...not in technical terms, but in MARKETING terms. Where's the "radios falling out of the skies" type commercial for TV and Movie Theaters that launched XM? Where's the man with his hair being blown back-type print campaign that made Maxell such a success? Advertising ON RADIO is great. I believe in the power of radio. But I also believe that "advertising is like fertilizer...it only works right if you spread it around". Radio shouldn't rely SOLELY on radio! And frankly radios use of it's own medium has been a textbook example of what not to do. If I hadn't been in radio, and following the development of digital broadcast technology through the years, I'd be confused about what HD IS, and whether it could benefit me.
Many here think the world is divided into two camps...those who support HD Radio, and those who don't. Actually the two camps are those who debate the relative merits (or lack thereof) of HD Radio, a tiny minority (ALL OF US), and those who have no freakin' notion of what the hell it is...the vast majority of Americans. THAT must be changed. Any new technology must not only make people aware of what it is, but also HOW IT BENEFITS THEM!
I'm sick of people citing the Ipod as pointing to the "instant success" of the mp3 market. Anyone who really follows technology knows that the Ipod came six or seven years after the first mp3 players, and was evolutionary, not revolutionary. Like most "overnight sensations", mp3 and internet radio TOOK MANY YEARS. Still less than a third of Americans have an mp3 player. LESS THAN A THIRD (reference: Bridge Ratings). Still, that's many tens of millions in sales...a rousing success! Between 93 and 95 percent of Americans listen to terrestrial radio EVERY WEEK (also reference: Bridge Ratings). THAT is one helluva platform from which to launch a new technology, IF IT'S DONE RIGHT. To quote Winston Churchill, "This is not the beginning of the end, but perhaps it is the end of the beginning."
Know how to tell if they REALLY know what the hell it is? ASK THEM TO EXPLAIN TO YOU WHAT HD RADIO IS! Almost none till be able to explain it, or what it offers that analog doesn't (hell, for years millions think they've already had "digital radio" because of the digital displays. I said in the 80s "a time will come when they regret calling these damn things "digital"...when there's nothing digital about the AUDIO!) HD is at the beginning, and frankly the rollout effort has stumbled...not in technical terms, but in MARKETING terms. Where's the "radios falling out of the skies" type commercial for TV and Movie Theaters that launched XM? Where's the man with his hair being blown back-type print campaign that made Maxell such a success? Advertising ON RADIO is great. I believe in the power of radio. But I also believe that "advertising is like fertilizer...it only works right if you spread it around". Radio shouldn't rely SOLELY on radio! And frankly radios use of it's own medium has been a textbook example of what not to do. If I hadn't been in radio, and following the development of digital broadcast technology through the years, I'd be confused about what HD IS, and whether it could benefit me.
Many here think the world is divided into two camps...those who support HD Radio, and those who don't. Actually the two camps are those who debate the relative merits (or lack thereof) of HD Radio, a tiny minority (ALL OF US), and those who have no freakin' notion of what the hell it is...the vast majority of Americans. THAT must be changed. Any new technology must not only make people aware of what it is, but also HOW IT BENEFITS THEM!
I'm sick of people citing the Ipod as pointing to the "instant success" of the mp3 market. Anyone who really follows technology knows that the Ipod came six or seven years after the first mp3 players, and was evolutionary, not revolutionary. Like most "overnight sensations", mp3 and internet radio TOOK MANY YEARS. Still less than a third of Americans have an mp3 player. LESS THAN A THIRD (reference: Bridge Ratings). Still, that's many tens of millions in sales...a rousing success! Between 93 and 95 percent of Americans listen to terrestrial radio EVERY WEEK (also reference: Bridge Ratings). THAT is one helluva platform from which to launch a new technology, IF IT'S DONE RIGHT. To quote Winston Churchill, "This is not the beginning of the end, but perhaps it is the end of the beginning."