Finn said:
Neanderpaul said:
Bigotry knows no color. Why is Don Imus a racist, but B.E.T. is acceptable? Why is Howard Stern racist, but "In Living Color" classic TV? Why is "Hymietown" forgiven, but "nappy headed ho's" "deplorable"?
Well, IMHO they are different because it's about relative power and picking on people your own size...
And I would counter with the assertion that targeting
everyone in comedy actually elevates everyone to an equal playing field.
Finn said:
When (not if, when*) black folks in this country catch up to the progress the Irish and Italians have made in terms of political and economic power, the jokes will be just that - jokes. In the meantime, it's picking on the little guy which is exactly the opposite of what makes this country great.
So, do you believe that it's acceptable to foster racism when one minority group levels racist speech at another? Two wrongs don't make it right. IMHO telling "black folks" that they haven't caught up with other ethnic groups, or referring to picking on the little guy, is every bit as degrading and dropping an "n" bomb. It says "you're still not equal."
Again...I'm not taking a shot at you. I'm just pointing out that in order to have true equality, we must not continue to look at anyone as not being "there yet." That's a societal foot on the throat. There exist programs in this country that give the disadvantaged unequal opportunity to better themselves. An argument can be made that "reverse racism" is an acceptable part of American society. Quotas are wrong. Always. They defy the concept of equality. Equal access should be the rule. But it isn't. We swing the pendulum too far in the opposite direction, which angers white America, and continues to foster segregation. Some would argue this is what our leaders prefer.
Finn said:
The paradox is that as blacks gain power (note Imus is in trouble the same year that Patrick won and election and Obama is getting $25 mil), their ability to extract apologies will increase just as their need for them will decline. Having said that and having really good black female friends during the course of my life, I really wish that all men, both white and black, would just treat them decently, especially those who are doing exactly what we want young women to be doing.... Sigh. They really do not have anyone in their corner, so when someone with the public platform like Imus, Severin, or anyone else goes after them, it's just icky.
Again...I believe there's a difference between using our differences in a humorous way, and legitimately trying to hold people down. Humor...is a healing skill. It can help us deal with potentially uncomfortable social issues through ridicule. I'm not saying people like Severin, or Imus aren't occasionally misguided. I am saying that we as a broadcast industry, cannot give Chris Rock an Emmy for a show that rips on white people, and crucify Don Imus for an unfunny reference to "nappy hair. "
If racial humor is wrong. Then, it's wrong on all fronts. That has to be the accepted policy, or else divisive speech will continue to be an issue forever.
...and it will.
Finn said:
* When black folks devote as much time and attention to Wall Street as they currently do to professional sports and the military, consider the possibilities...
As legitimate as that statement might be, there are those who would say you're a racist for tabling it. Because somewhere along the line, it became wrong for any ethnic group to specialize in any one skill, or craft. Back when..."black folk" were dancers in films. When you have a pigment-based format, how often do we see a white guy holding down AM drive?
Generations ago, our physical prowess dictated our jobs. It still does. Large men carry heavy machinery. Small men are more involved in strategic areas. But, if we apply any ethnic, or skin pigment to the discussion, it's racist.
Stereotypes exist because the great majority of the group being stereotyped, engage in the stereotype-defining behavior.
Imus stereotyped. It happens in the media every day. Watch the NBC Nightly News tonight, and try and tell me a story won't be targeted toward some ethnic group.
"Tonight...more and more <insert ethnicity here> are likely to inherit <insert malady here>"
Can't have it both ways...