> Was through Indy earlier in the week. Not that impressive
> for market-41. Is there good radio there? Yes. Good talent?
> Not everywhere but, yes. Went through "The Haute" too and
> it's radio in a low 100's market. Is there good radio there
> for a low 100-market? Yes. Is there talent there? Yes, at
> places for a low 100-market. When you compare apples to
> watermellons you're going to see the big differences. When
> you bring it down to an apple-to-apple comparison, they're
> about the same when it comes to the amount of good talent in
> the market for the number of stations there, their
> promotions and what the "community goals" are for the given
> market and station. In reality, there should be a bigger
> difference than there is (in favor of Indy), but there's
> not. Not picking, because we have the same problem here in
> Denver when it comes to Denver vs Colorado Springs. I'm just
> saying...
>
> > > > > > They may not have much diversity versus the BIG
> CITY
> >
> > > but
> > > >
> > > > > > MIX-FM in particular blows away RadioNow as a
> > Top-40.
> > >
> > > > > > MIX-FM blows away almost any BIG CITY Top-40
> station
> >
> > > out
> > > >
> > > > > > there. They always have. I used to live through
> > > static
> > > >
> > > > > on
> > > > > > the west bypass of Indy to listen to 100.7 over
> > 93.1.
> > >
> > > > The
> > > > >
> > > > > > only station to sound better is another Indiana
> > small
> > > > city
> > > > >
> > > > > > Top-40 - 96-5 WAZY last year when Mark Driscoll
> was
> > > > doing
> > > > > > the VO's there. Give some props to these midwest,
>
> > > > smaller
> > > > >
> > > > > > town Top-40 giants. The BIG CITY of INDY could
> take
> >
> > > > some
> > > > > > notes as least in this format.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > For example? What makes MIX FM better?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Imaging, recurrent and gold selections, more in touch
> > with
> > >
> > > > the community, overall feel and presentation of the
> > > station.
> > > > Listen and learn.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I used to love AZY when I lived in North Central
> Indiana,
> > in
> > > the 80s. If they do the same today as they did then,
> then
> > I
> > > agree they are better. Haven't heard MIX-FM, though.
> >
> >
> > > If you mean the proper way to doink your sister, then
> yes,
> > the BIG CITY does have a lot to learn. Po-Dunk towns have
> > lame air talents and crappy imaging. PERIOD. Music can be
> > debated, but "big time" sound can not. The best jock in
> the
> > sticks makes a good weekender in Indy. Not saying that all
>
> > jocks in Indy are good, but as a whole, compared to
> > Terre-Tucky, they are better! HOLY COW!
> >
>
I think we have to remember in every market there are good jocks and not so good jocks. In NYC it's the same issue and it's the #1 market in the states. Being given the freedom to be a "good jock" has a lot to do with the sound of a lot of people on the air today, throw in, consolidation, consultants and their playlist, owners who have no clue how the business works, voice tracking, and PD's unable to or afraid to make a decision on what happens on his/her station, let's not forget the corporate PD. Remember the old phrase to many cooks in the kitchen spoil the meal? Look at most of the "Jack" formats, any "live" talent? In most markets no, yet people talk about how much they like the format while Jocks are given less opportunities to be "live" on the air anymore. As different as the "Jack" format is, it's not good for those of us in the business who enjoy being on the air.
I've asked this on other sites, what do you think makes a good Jock? Where can they get the training to be "good"? What would you do to bring a positive change to radio to make it strong again?