Re: Is it possible for a Radio Station that doesn't play the same songs over & over?
Phedeks said:
You're trying to explain something to people who get paid by clear channel to give BS answers that Radio is great and doing great.
Believe it or not, about 12 out of every 13 radio station employees actually works for Clear Channel, by my estimate. Those that don't work for Clear Channel actually compete with them, so they would not be likely to toe any supposed Clear Channel line, in any case.
No business or industry sector is doing "great." We're going into a second recession.
Even the sectors that are supposedly immune to troubled times are in trouble. Even the old "people don't stop dying" adage does not work as folks are buying less expensive funerals and services because times are hard.
The facts don't matter to them, they'd rather keep saying nothing is true and radio is doing well.
The first fact is that nobody is denying that radio lost about 30% or so of its total revenue since the recession started, and only a tick or two have been recovered. Most is due to the economy, and then there is the part due to changes in entertainment options as a second punch.
Or something about how we are all wrong and the radio execs are all right and not losing money.
Good stations continue to make money. Just less money. Throughout the last five or 6 decades, about half of all stations have lost money or only broken even, so "dog" stations are nothing new... complicated by things like Docket 80-90, which was not something wished for by the "big guys" for the most part.
Fact is commercial radio today sucks and most people who have listened to modern commercial radio agree.
The real fact is that commercial radio is generally as good as it can be in these times. About 95% of all persons use radio, and despite the fact that listening time is fragmented somewhat by other options, radio is used nearly universally... and a lot by a huge segment of the population.
If you consult a group of people who are not recruited due to station usage but by taste sectors you don't find significant dissatisfaction. You find more entertainment options are used, but very few say "radio sucks" while many consider radio a compliment to other media or a convenient way of getting information or entertainment.
The music being played is CRAP with the exception of maybe 1 or 2 songs. The amount of commercials sucks, the repeat rotation sucks, the morning shows are nothing but more of the same music with a joke thrown in here or there. Why can't JV & Rico talk more during his show? We have options now to not hear 20 minutes of BS commercials that don't influence anybody to buy their crap & shitty music.
You have opinions on music that are your own. You have opinions on rotations that are shared by nearly nobody. You have an inconsistency about whether you want more music or more talk in the morning.
And, yeah, I'll agree that radio has to be very conscious of the commercial load if it wants to compete directly with your iPod or Pandora. But, maybe, there is opportunity to deal with this gradually over time... not by tomorrow as you seem to want.