Country will be on 98.5 and continue the simulcast.
Definitely a bigger signal than 94.5, especially towards the east. At one time, KBAY operated on that frequency, but not as a country station.
Country will be on 98.5 and continue the simulcast.
Its not that San Francisco has shrunk.
1. Dallas and Houston have grown rapidly
2. While the Bay Area has lost some population. It is still a strong economy. In fact, it’s been quoted between 1 and 1.5 trillion?
3. The billing is like a smaller market can be a fair assessment, but can be misleading. A: how do the numbers compare to other markets? Since revenue is down everywhere. B: the “ people using terrestrial radio” numbers in the Bay Area may be far lower than everyone else given its tech rich history.
I can appreciate that sentiment and it might work if the pie was stable. It isn't. As the numbers on the previous pages show—and as most of us in the industry already know—the pie continues to shrink.
Perhaps those who welcome a competitor being removed from the for-profit battle see a larger piece of a smaller pie as the difference between staying afloat and sinking.
No it didn't. Never was. KBAY used to be on...At one time, KBAY operated on that frequency, but not as a country station.
KBAY was at 100.3No it didn't. Never was. KBAY used to be on 101.3, these days the Spanish "Amor" station in the market. Before that and for many years prior it was a beautiful music station, and evolved into a soft AC. The old KBAY was often #1 in the San Jose/South Bay embedded market.
1. Dallas and Houston have grown rapidly...
Also San Antonio. It's grown into a major market, in or near the top 10 in recent years. (And while1. True and Austin is sometimes mentioned here for growing the same way.
2. same given the attention that there were companies moving their headquarters from California for Texas in the past 6 years but startups have taken the void in the Bay Area and we had to wait for the long term effects to find out.
You're correct, I knew it was 100.3 and mistyped it anyway. Already corrected. Thank you for catching that.The
KBAY was at 100.3
San Antonio is ranked at 24th.Also San Antonio. It's grown into a major market, in or near the top 10 in recent years. (And whilenownot nearly as big, El Paso has also benefitted from some of that corporate migration.) Some of that is the aftereffect of the pandemic.
So Dallas, Houston, Austin, San Antonio have all been eating California's lunch over the last decade or so.
It's going to be interesting to see how many immigrants to Texas decide they like it there and want to stay, verses how many are just biding their time till they can engineer a return to the West Coast. (The smart money never minimizes the "Hotel California" effect.) Though there is the cost of re-entry, i.e. home prices. If someone was a renter, then it's a non-issue. If they owned and rented out their home while simultaneously renting in Texas, the probability's higher that they plan to return eventually. But if they cashed out and bought in Texas, they might never be able to buy back into the California housing market. (All of which presumes that current and long-time trends don't collapse.)
GDP wise Dallas and Houston are not eating the Bay Area for lunch. While they are both gaining ground, San Francisco/Oakland without San Jose is 4th economy in the country. Adding San Jose it’s nearly tied with LA at 1.3 trillion.
The bad news is the pie will continue to shrink, so the benefit is temporary.
Just remember: Those sales largely happen because of that shrinking ad dollar pie, because there comes a point where the operating costs exceed the size of that pie slice.
No disagreement with the concept that operators like a competitor being removed. In certain markets that might be enough - maybe for years.I'd like to quickly reply to the first paragraph of this post, while generally agreeing with the rest without commenting.
Perhaps those who welcome a competitor being removed from the for-profit battle see a larger piece of a smaller pie as the difference between staying afloat and sinking.
If they aren't careful, there will also come a point where the FM dial doesn't offer enough choice for the people who don't like their offering. At that point, even the share gains they are seeing in recent years will begin to translate to fewer actual listeners.
At the same time, I think the religious broadcasters have to be careful. If they aren't careful, there will also come a point where the FM dial doesn't offer enough choice for the people who don't like their offering. At that point, even the share gains they are seeing in recent years will begin to translate to fewer actual listeners.
True too we see these same changes on the TV side for the same reasons. But on the TV side it’s more about merging with adapting to TV apps today. I seen KTSF-TV promote the Zeam app as an indication of where their audience went and attract some of them to the app as part of the way for them to adapt to their current audiences in the Bay Area.A lot of it is taxes and cost of living. Those Californians in Texas are the reason why Texas is turning blue, and why rural Texans are trying to redistrict those cities in ways that limit the impact they're having. It's been my experience that you can move Californians to different areas, but they remain Californian culturally. Same with New Yorkers moving to Florida. It's a different kind of immigration.
Those changes are also affecting the Bay area. There was a time when a country station could be Top 5 or better in San Francisco. KSAN as a country station was huge in the 80s. There were actually two country stations in San Francisco in the 90s: KSAN and KYCY. But then the population changed and both stations went away. Just as there was an audience for KGO, but it went away.