• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Late Show ending May 2026

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Rural Purge was done so CBS can replace those shows with those who appealed tom the demographics that the Advertisers wanted to target.
What sales demo covers "like Hee Haw" vs. "Likes E.R."? The attitude that CBS had was more about the perception of "The Tiffany Network" being considered to be less sophisticated.
 
What sales demo covers "like Hee Haw" vs. "Likes E.R."? The attitude that CBS had was more about the perception of "The Tiffany Network" being considered to be less sophisticated.

At least in the case of "Hee Haw", their logic was faulty, because the show lasted another 25 seasons in first-run syndication.
 
At least in the case of "Hee Haw", their logic was faulty, because the show lasted another 25 seasons in first-run syndication.
But the logic was based on the supposed perception that CBS was the "quality network" while NBC was "built to sell TV sets" and ABC was table scraps.

Remember, after the "freeze" was lifted and many markets that had only one or two TV stations suddenly got at least three. The local station that was either NBC and ABC or CBS and ABC always gave up ABC to the newcomer.
 
And Hee Haw managed to continue on in syndication well until the June of 1993 when production had ceased (Coincidentally around the same time Letterman had left NBC to go to CBS).

The Rural Purge was done so CBS can replace those shows with those who appealed tom the demographics that the Advertisers wanted to target.



Was those political views mentioned on their respective shows or elsewhere like on a Daytime talk show.
On their shows.
 
But the logic was based on the supposed perception that CBS was the "quality network" while NBC was "built to sell TV sets" and ABC was table scraps.

Remember, after the "freeze" was lifted and many markets that had only one or two TV stations suddenly got at least three. The local station that was either NBC and ABC or CBS and ABC always gave up ABC to the newcomer.

I think the timeline is getting a little skewed here.

The whole "Tiffany Network" thing really revolves around its high-minded programming in the 1950s---the news division with the sterling reputation that was carried over from CBS radio during World War II, Murrow's showdown with McCarthy, and its long-running, high-quality drama anthology "Studio One".

But it was I Love Lucy that made the cash register ring, and William Paley (who people forget was a young man---he founded CBS at the age of 26 and was only 50 when he put Lucy on TV) saw money in mass appeal, not snob appeal.

When Paley hired Jim Aubrey as President of CBS Entertainment, Aubrey delivered---Mr. Ed, The Beverly Hillbillies---and his successor Mike Dann followed with Gilligan's Island, Petticoat Junction, and Green Acres---all massive hits. So was The Dick Van Dyke Show, but that was a surprise.

The move to ditch the rural stuff (Hee Haw premiered as a summer replacement in 1969), came not as an attempt to emphasize quality or "class", but because Mike Dann's successor, 33-year-old Fred Silverman, was big on research and he saw that scoring big in 18-49 in major cities would be more lucrative in terms of agency business.

And thus came Mary Tyler Moore, Bob Newhart, All In The Family, M*A*S*H, which were quality shows but only because of Grant Tinker and Norman Lear and Larry Gelbart.

Fred had no allegiance to quality or pretense, as he'd soon prove at ABC (Happy Days, Laverne & Shirley, Welcome Back Kotter) and at NBC (Supertrain, Manimal, Pink Lady and Jeff).


My favorite Silverman story:

Shortly after getting the President of CBS Entertainment gig, Fred (and again, remember, he's green---33 years old, had been working at local stations just a couple of years before) decides that it would be cool to drop by Desilu and just stick his head in on Lucille Ball.

At this point, Lucy's third show, Here's Lucy, is in its third season. Lucy's a widow with two teenaged children (played by her real-life children, Desi Arnaz, Jr,. and Lucie Arnaz) and it's not great. By far the weakest of the three Lucy series. Even so, it's still in the top five shows most weeks in the ratings.

So Fred stops by, introduces himself and then starts to tell Lucy how he thinks her show could be better.

Lucy: "Can you hold that thought for just a moment? I just remembered I need to make a phone call."

Fred: "Would you like some privacy? I could step out."

Lucy: "Oh, no. That won't be necessary. Stay right there. This won't take long."

(Lucy dials the phone)

Lucy: "Hi, Joan. It's Lucy. Is Bill in? Thanks."

(a few seconds)

Lucy: "Hi, Bill. It's Lucy. How's Babe? Oh, that's wonderful. Listen, I have a young man here who works for you named Fred...what is it honey? Silverman? Silverman. And he has some ideas about how to "fix" my show. So I'm going to hand the phone over to him so you can tell him to go f**k himself."

(Lucy hands the phone to Silverman)

William S. Paley: "Good God, Fred. Get the hell out of there now and call me when you're someplace far away from Desilu!"
 
Last edited:
I think the timeline is getting a little skewed here.
But my point is that CBS always, in that era, thought of itself as being the premium network. And ABC was, of course, the result of the spin-off of NBC's weaker brother back in the Red and Blue days.
The whole "Tiffany Network" thing really revolves around its high-minded programming in the 1950s---the news division with the sterling reputation that was carried over from CBS radio during World War II, Murrow's showdown with McCarthy, and its long-running, high-quality drama anthology "Studio One".
But the image was valuable at the sales level, particularly with the advertiser categories that looked for strong middle class appeal. The web tried to be image aware if not image-driven well through the 70's.
But it was I Love Lucy that made the cash register ring, and William Paley (who people forget was a young man---he founded CBS at the age of 26 and was only 50 when he put Lucy on TV) saw money in mass appeal, not snob appeal.
But he wanted both. He saw how ABC, no matter how successful its programs, was on the worst-coverage station in the market... or its only UHF one. He knew that the image kept affiliates and the owners of stations thought that they had the easiest brand to sell. It was a compromise, of course. Local stations doing selling to the Buick dealer did not push Hillbillies or, probably, even mention the show.
When Paley hired Jim Aubrey as President of CBS Entertainment, Aubrey delivered---Mr. Ed, The Beverly Hillbillies---and his successor Mike Dann followed with Gilligan's Island, Petticoat Junction, and Green Acres---all massive hits. So was The Dick Van Dyke Show, but that was a surprise.
Several of those shows were simplistic and lowbrow, but Mr Ed was not patently a rural show... it was a novelty show that magically worked (I have a neighbor with a dog named "Mr Ed"). Gilligan's was not rural, nor was Van Dyke. Even Green Acres was the story of an urban woman who created joke environments due to her lack of understanding of her environment.

None had "hicks" popping out of a field with "corny" jokes. It may have been an issue of how rural they could go. Beverly Hillbillies in many ways ridiculed country people, while Hee Haw glorified or celebrated them.
 
I can not take Gutfeld! more than once or twice a week, but it is amusing to me as it makes fun of issues and people that I find frighteningly scary such as Sshiff, The Squad, Weingarten and Mamdani.

You know what? I wasn't gonna, but I'm gonna.

David, maybe if you stopped watching FOX News and especially Gutfeld and had a well-rounded diet of mainstream news, you wouldn't find those people frighteningly scary.

Maybe in the areas of policy where you disagreed with them after less inflammatory, less libelous coverage, you'd be in a position to formulate cogent alternatives to their policies, possibly even arguments that could sway reasonable people on certain topics.

But knowing that you know the kind of crap Gutfeld says (Seriously? Hunter Biden wanted to bang Jill?) and you watch it anyway and find it amusing? I'd be way less inclined to listen.




(Sorry, Lance---I let it bug me for a good two hours before I finally gave in)
 
I liked Hee Haw, too.

There are moments when slapstick comedy is kinda' fun. I can not take Gutfeld! more than once or twice a week, but it is amusing to me as it makes fun of issues and people that I find frighteningly scary such as Sshiff, The Squad, Weingarten and Mamdani. It's a way of venting frustration.
Don't know the other ones you mentioned except The Squad. Out there...yeah, a little. Scary? No...nothing AOC has said that's "scary."
 
None had "hicks" popping out of a field with "corny" jokes. It may have been an issue of how rural they could go. Beverly Hillbillies in many ways ridiculed country people, while Hee Haw glorified or celebrated them.

Actually, I've always seen it as kind of the other way around. On TBH, aside from Jethro, the country folks were actually sympathetic and reasonably intelligent in their own way (especially Jed), while it was the city people who came across as buffoons. (Jane Hathaway was not nearly as clueless as the rest.) On the other hand, I always found Hee Haw kind of cringy, a type of Appalachian-and-white-Southern minstrel show, though their musical acts were second to none. Roy Clark set the gold standard for guitar music.
 
It took me 20 years to get the central joke of Green Acres. They tell the story in the theme song—-Oliver wants the country life. Lisa wants to stay in Manhattan.

They move. There are all these bizarre characters. A pig named Arnold.

Lisa treats it all like it’s perfectly normal. She’s fine there. It’s Oliver who’s on the verge of a stroke in every episode, and who would be a lot better off in New York.
 
Even Green Acres was the story of an urban woman who created joke environments due to her lack of understanding of her environment.
I don't remember it quite that way...and I lived in some very rural areas, including one year in a town of fewer than 800 people. What I picked up on were all the local characters constantly outmaneuvering and outsmarting the big city lawyer who was used to getting things his own way.

Secondarily, it could be viewed as a satire of city people yearning for the rustic life.

Mike's theory of the show is pretty good, too.

About the Beverly Hillbillies: once in a while I watch classic Password reruns. One day I saw one from 1966, but I missed the start of the show. The female celebrity guest was a slight, very elegant woman, dressed to the hilt, complete with a pearl necklace. She was well spoken. I couldn't figure out who she was. Then something amusing happened on the show. She cackled. Then it struck me: she was Irene Ryan.

That's how good of an actress she was. Granny was practically her polar opposite. Irene Ryan played her convincingly.
 
But knowing that you know the kind of crap Gutfeld says (Seriously? Hunter Biden wanted to bang Jill?) and you watch it anyway and find it amusing? I'd be way less inclined to listen.
Here is why hyperbole is often misunderstood if used before an audience that does not like the "performers" to begin with.

I'll start with my example of why neither I nor anyone in my family that lives in the "lower 48" understands or likes Seinfeld: the show is so totally dependent on an understanding and, perhaps, integration with one part of American culture that if you "don't belong" you just don't get it.

In the case of politically themed shows, you have to be at least slightly partisan to the underlying philosophy of each program.

Again, another example: I can't find SNL fun or funny as it is both socially and philosophically not on a band that my inner radio can tune. I felt that way when I viewed early SNL shows, and just find that the current ones are the same thing, but not as well done.

So my feeling on Gutfeld! is that you have to be in the culture to understand. If you don't get the extreme hyperbole of the "Hunter Biden wanted to bang Jill" based on Hunter actually banging his brother's widow, I doubt that the way I see it can be explained. However, that did seem... like a lot of Gutfeld's stuff... a bridge too far.

But I have the same reaction if I see (insert name of any of the three two night talk show hosts) interviewing Barbra Streisand.

Of course, this is entertainment, not news. For all but local and state, news I follow Reuters and Infobae principally. Both have a less partisan view of "all things American" and seem to get the facts better than any U.S. medium or source.
 
Totally agree. Apart from Paramount Studios in Hollywood, I don't think Skydance is interested in real estate.

It's a designated New York City landmark and on the National Register of Historic Places.

I was surprised to learn, fairly recently, that CBS' use of the Sullivan dates back to 1936. A lot of radio shows were performed there.

It was 1950 when CBS retrofitted it for television. And it was then known as CBS Studio 50. CBS didn't actually buy it until 1993, when it needed a home for David Letterman. Everything CBS did there over 57 years to that point had been under various leases.

I was also surprised to learn that unlike Letterman and Colbert, Ed Sullivan did not have exclusive use of the theater. Sullivan's show was Sunday nights and during the week, game shows like What's My Line, To Tell The Truth and Password all shot at the Sullivan, as did Merv Griffin's short-lived (1969-72) late night show that was CBS' first attempt to compete with Johnny Carson.

When CBS cancelled The Ed Sullivan Show in 1971, game show production had largely moved to the West Coast and bookings became less frequent.

Dick Clark's $10,000 Pyramid was shot at the Ed Sullivan Theater beginning in 1973.

CBS' lease came up in 1976, and it didn't have anything to put there, so its direct involvement ended until they bought it for Letterman.

In the 70s and 80s, it was TeleTape Studios, and a grab bag of shows were shot there---including the sitcom Kate & Allie.

There's no doubt in my mind The Ed will be sold. CBS will really have no need for it next year. I guess the real question is.....

Who in the heck will buy the place?

Right now, it's configured for TV with around a 450-seat audience. I couldn't see any Broadway shows moving in there with such a small audience capacity. It's one of those weird pieces of real estate that's set up for a specialized purpose. I don't think any of the other networks will want it. I have a feeling CBS will have a hard time unloading it. I'm looking forward to seeing the LoopNet listing.😄

EDIT: Here's the old LoopNet listing, lol

 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Back
Top Bottom