• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Laura Ingraham to WWBA Mornings?

Naughtytalker is oblivious to the writing on the wall. His turn will come soon enough.

This industry has a habit of chewing people up and spitting them out, I can't wait! :)
 
Cedric,

I sense your deep rage and bitterness, but please don't waste your life or these important threads wishing ill upon others in our mutually chosen broadcast profession. My heart is heavy knowing you are to weak to reap what you sew, I will not lash back.

Instead, my giving hands will now share with you alone, the incredible secret that has kept Naughtytalker a richly rewarded and indispensable major market radio and TV personality for almost three decades... I encourage you to dream big.

Grasshopper, what follows is the truism that will propel your career from a gravity sucking black hole to the edges of interstellar space. Are you ready?... prepare yourself!... hold on tight... "I was lookin' for a job when I found this one."

Now, go forth and be fruitful.
 
I think Mark Larsen's shtick is dated -- from a time when the pathway to success was seen as formats that rigidly separated by race, and a time when people actually paid attention to the Uhuru movement in St. Petersburg. The audience that listened to him in his 90's heyday on 970 were boomers who grew up in schools divided by riots over integration in the 60's and 70's, where blacks and whites may have been in the same school but hung out in separate cliques.

Contrast that with the life experiences of today's teens and twentysomethings. Nick Schuyler talking about the agony of losing his friends at sea -- black and white. A black teenager's white high schools friends in Bradenton mourning his early demise at the hands of a gunman. Larsen's generation knew "some of my best friends are..." as a CYA expression of insincerity. The generation moving into talk radio demographics in a few years can use it without a hint of irony. In fact, they probably wouldn't see why anybody would find that to be a strange statement. Larsen's act will never make it with that cohort, but he'll probably be done with radio by the time they enter their prime talk radio years anyway.

York made his biggest error by trying to copy a 90's shtick aimed at a generation other than his own and try to make it work in 2008-09. Sometimes it would seem as though he were trying to make some kind of ironic statement by pawing through racial issues on the air -- but he didn't try hard enough.
 
Ok I've seen this criticism multiple times by the same person, and since I've finally found nothing better to do I have to respond to this.

I'll be the first to admit that when I first started I was hardly more than someone with a younger voice trying to do his best Mark Larsen impression. I even found myself using some of his little lines and catchphrases, which I had to quickly force myself to stop doing (Mark once came in the studio and threatened to smack me..). It was easy to do when I sat and listened to him 3 hours every single day...

But if I'm honest with myself I'd say after the first 4 months on the air I stopped trying to imitate others and actually just opened the paper and started talking about what I saw going on in Tampa. Now, since I've been listening to my airchecks the past few weeks even I admit I was FAR from the host I wanted to be, but to sit here and classify me as "Larsen lite" I think is just not factual.
 
Dan York said:
Ok I've seen this criticism multiple times by the same person, and since I've finally found nothing better to do I have to respond to this.

I'll be the first to admit that when I first started I was hardly more than someone with a younger voice trying to do his best Mark Larsen impression. I even found myself using some of his little lines and catchphrases, which I had to quickly force myself to stop doing (Mark once came in the studio and threatened to smack me..). It was easy to do when I sat and listened to him 3 hours every single day...

But if I'm honest with myself I'd say after the first 4 months on the air I stopped trying to imitate others and actually just opened the paper and started talking about what I saw going on in Tampa. Now, since I've been listening to my airchecks the past few weeks even I admit I was FAR from the host I wanted to be, but to sit here and classify me as "Larsen lite" I think is just not factual.
-------------------
Dan,

I don't know that I would agree with your critics that you were a "Larsen-Lite" or even a diamond in the rough; I thought your show, though not perfect (what show is?!?) was a refreshing change from the same old talk radio that can be heard in any city across the country, across the dial.
I grew tired of Dark Larsen (as the late Bob Lassiter called him!) about 5 or 6 years ago.

I actually had great hopes for
WWBA 820 right after the frequency change; the newscasts were good and even though you and Daniel Ruth appear to be 180 degrees apart politically; I enjoyed both of your shows......... but alas, there is no longer any reason for me to listen to WWBA any longer.

All the best to you; goood luck and Godspeed!

drt
 
Dan,

I have said here before that you sucked when you first started but you did go right to work and started making your show MUCH better.

I had a feeling you would not last as you were an expence that they could not afford. I thank them for at least trying to be a local radio station and I thank you for many hours of great entertainment.
 
MichaelCrose said:
I have said here before that you sucked when you first started but you did go right to work and started making your show MUCH better.

The question is not whether or not Dan sucked. The real question is, did he suck harder than Glenn Beck/Mike Gallagher? The answer... no.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom