On the NFL blackout site, It lists Browns-Lions as being shown in avout half of Ohio and parts of Michigan..A very small area..
http://the506.com/nflmaps/2009/11-CBS-E.html
http://the506.com/nflmaps/2009/11-CBS-E.html
DToTheJ said:That makes four. Would that be a record for most blacked out games in a single week?
Err....Don't you mean that at least one game per week was blacked out in the first half of the 1998 season??liradioisbad said:It wasn't until 1998 where we had a week where every game was sold out, and in 2006, every game during the first half of the season was blacked out.
I agree. Not with so many cities in America who would LOVE to have an NFL franchise in their backyard. Look at what the NBA with the old Seattle SuperSonics. They're now in OKC. I'm sure the NFL could make a similar move (Like relocating the Jaguars to Las Vegas & sending them to the NFC in exchange for St. Louis).DToTheJ said:Meanwhile, in Jacksonville: An unprecedented sixth home game in a row has blacked out. This despite the fact that the Jaguars have won their fourth home game in a row, leading into this Sunday's matchup vs. Houston:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ap-jaguars-blackout&prov=ap&type=lgns
This can't sit right with Mr. Goodell.
Pat Cook said:I agree. Not with so many cities in America who would LOVE to have an NFL franchise in their backyard. Look at what the NBA with the old Seattle SuperSonics. They're now in OKC. I'm sure the NFL could make a similar move (Like relocating the Jaguars to Las Vegas & sending them to the NFC in exchange for St. Louis).DToTheJ said:Meanwhile, in Jacksonville: An unprecedented sixth home game in a row has blacked out. This despite the fact that the Jaguars have won their fourth home game in a row, leading into this Sunday's matchup vs. Houston:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ap-jaguars-blackout&prov=ap&type=lgns
This can't sit right with Mr. Goodell.
Just my opinion.....
Cheers
cowboybud said:The NFL wants nothing to do with Las Vegas, for obvious reasons.
LynnW said:In 1993, the Patriots were close to being moved to St. Louis and would have been renamed the Stallions.
DToTheJ said:LynnW said:In 1993, the Patriots were close to being moved to St. Louis and would have been renamed the Stallions.
Is that right? The Patriots? I'm not doubting you, of course... But I doubt the team will be going anywhere now...
BRNout said:Believe it or not, yes. Before Bob Kraft bought the team and built Gillette Stadium, the Pats struggled for a number of years. They played in Schaefer Stadium, which was the last NFL stadium to have benches instead of seats (IIRC). Hard metal benches, tightly packed and totally open to the elements.
So yes, it's hard to believe it now, but there was a time not so long ago that New England almost lost the Patriots.
I don't think that that is what they are worried about. More likely, the temptations to the players themselves if the NFL ever located a team there.dhett said:Yeah, that market would be a bigger disaster than Jacksonville. Jax has the potential of drawing fans from Southern Georgia and Northern Florida, while Las Vegas has just Las Vegas. All right, they could draw fans from Lake Havasu City, Kingman, Bullhead City/Laughlin, Pahrump, Mesquite and Saint George as well. Never underestimate the potential from Pahrump, either.cowboybud said:The NFL wants nothing to do with Las Vegas, for obvious reasons.
If Vegas ever got a team, I seriously doubt that gambling would be a problem with it. They keep a tight lid on things and would make sure that the gambling stay separate from the local team, most likely forbidding gambling on them at all. And as long as the mob gets a big enough piece of the action, they would see to the strictest enforcement.
KeithE4 said:No they didn't. Last I checked, Hartford CT is still a part of New England. They wouldn't have even had to change the name of the team.
BRNout said:KeithE4 said:No they didn't. Last I checked, Hartford CT is still a part of New England. They wouldn't have even had to change the name of the team.
Yeah, you're right about that and I certainly know better....of course Connecticut is part of New England! :I guess I was thinking of Massachusetts and writing "New England" at the same time - my big error and I'm glad you corrected it.
firepoint525 said:I don't think that that is what they are worried about. More likely, the temptations to the players themselves if the NFL ever located a team there.dhett said:Yeah, that market would be a bigger disaster than Jacksonville. Jax has the potential of drawing fans from Southern Georgia and Northern Florida, while Las Vegas has just Las Vegas. All right, they could draw fans from Lake Havasu City, Kingman, Bullhead City/Laughlin, Pahrump, Mesquite and Saint George as well. Never underestimate the potential from Pahrump, either.cowboybud said:The NFL wants nothing to do with Las Vegas, for obvious reasons.
If Vegas ever got a team, I seriously doubt that gambling would be a problem with it. They keep a tight lid on things and would make sure that the gambling stay separate from the local team, most likely forbidding gambling on them at all. And as long as the mob gets a big enough piece of the action, they would see to the strictest enforcement.