• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

OLDIES 106 ALREADY SOUNDING BETTER

I really wish that people who work in radio could manage to listen to a radio station with the same perspective as the average listener out there. People who work in radio seem to have this "can't see the forest for the trees" vision. They notice picayune little details that the average listener doesn't catch or care about, but miss the overall, big-picture sound of the station.

Lately, as my wife has been putting 106 on the radio at home more and more at home, and I'm stuck listening to it, what sticks out isn't whether the songs came from 1965 or 1975, or who the DJ was. What sticks out is its still sounds like old bubblegum music. If you happen to like old bubblegum music, great. It's good that there's a station that you can listen to that plays the old bubblegum music that you like. There's absolutely nothing wrong with targeting the fans of old bubblegum music as a market.

But what's the point of getting carried away about big changes when the changes are so subtle that only someone who works in radio or a mega-radio nerd would notice them?
 
Talk_Dude said:
What sticks out is its still sounds like old bubblegum music. If you happen to like old bubblegum music, great. It's good that there's a station that you can listen to that plays the old bubblegum music that you like. There's absolutely nothing wrong with targeting the fans of old bubblegum music as a market.
106.7 isn't going to be a deep-cut classic rock station (ask Neil Millman at Z90Dave how that worked out), or even an AORish classic hits station like the NEW 97.1 The River. The number of old pop hits--even chart-toppers--that have been derided as bubblegum at some point past or present is legion.

Sean Ross had a great column on this phenomenon yesterday, specifically discussing "Little Willy" by Sweet and 1970s British glam rock in general, and carrying it forward to newer Chinn/Chapman works like "Mickey" by Toni Basil (which went to #1), another song that, ahem, raises strong opinions.
 
jabba17 said:
secondchoice said:
RoddyFreeman said:
They dropped Scott Shannon totally. They had planned to do that as soon as next week. But one day last week, Shannon announced on the air that he had "terrible news" and went on to talk about the change. The Citadel switchboard exploded, and the station made a decision to drop Shannon immediately.

Shannon got Fred canned and now Shannon is gone from 106.7. Of course Shannon still has a paycheck. Someone at Citadel needlessly fired a good guy.
Is Shannon gone from Citadel or just from 106.7? I thought that 106.7 just dumped the Citadel True Oldies network feed and went local. Is there more to this story than that?


Shannon is still on the True Oldies Channel and has a job. Fred does not. There is this statement about Atlanta:

http://trueoldies.com/Article.asp?id=2033119&spid=34406

This is an easy fix. Put Shannon on HD #2 on 106.7. Citadel has HD on 106.7. This should not be too hard. True Oldies is on 95.5 WPLJ HD #2 in NYC
I wonder if Citadel was really thinking when they cut Fred. They have some cash (as a company coming out of bankruptcy should) and this might matter nationally but the Atlanta operation’s administrative costs are going up. They have to “staff” 106.7 and pay Fred’s severance. The severance might not have been a big deal but their unemployment tax is based on an historical rate of how many or and percentage of claims. Fred’s departure and the Y106 staff’s dismissal will take some time to bring the tax rate down.
 
Reminds me of the old "Shannon" song by Henry Gross...............106.7 should play that

Shannon is gone. I hope she's drifting out to sea.
She always loved to swim away.
Maybe she'll find an island with a shady tree.

Bye bye Shannon........take your old old 45s with you........swim away........drift to an
island.....with a shady tree.......106 doesn't miss you......we listeners don't either.
 
Clark2 said:
Chancethegardner said:
You seem to be forgetting that Mark Richards is the one that took Fox 97 down the toilet. You think he'll do any better with 106? He'll screw it up, mark (no pun intended) my words.

You don't know what you're talking about. The only one who took Fox 97 "down the toilet" was Bob Neil. And he did it by ignoring Mark Richards' advice.

We'll see.
 
I might as well be listening to 97 the "new" River......Do not like the change in music. Why can't stations have jingles anymore????

An awesome online I phone station is Rhythm 'n' Gold from shoutcast
The have various jingles from the big top 40 stations including WQXI, WPLO
 
I though it cool to hear Bill Celler on 106.7 last week when Trip West was sick,I use to wish we could have gotten him on 106.7 back when it was Eagle,but I guess he had too much invested with Kicks.
 
jabba17 said:
Talk_Dude said:
What sticks out is its still sounds like old bubblegum music. If you happen to like old bubblegum music, great. It's good that there's a station that you can listen to that plays the old bubblegum music that you like. There's absolutely nothing wrong with targeting the fans of old bubblegum music as a market.
106.7 isn't going to be a deep-cut classic rock station (ask Neil Millman at Z90Dave how that worked out), or even an AORish classic hits station like the NEW 97.1 The River. The number of old pop hits--even chart-toppers--that have been derided as bubblegum at some point past or present is legion.

I'm not saying that an oldies station that plays vintage music to appeal to older people needs to play classic rock deep cuts. I'm just saying that people who are now in their 30's, 40's, and 50's might have pushed bubblegum songs like "Sugar Sugar" to the top of the charts while more 'mature' sounding Top 40 songs only made it to the bottom 20 of the Top 40 back in the day. But as the audiences get older, and their tastes mature, they come to appreciate the songs that charted at the bottom of the Top 40 more than the bubblegum songs that charted at the top of the Top 40. Children in 1969 might have thought "Sugar, Sugar" was the best song of the year. But those children who are now adults probably would prefer nowadays to hear "I'd Wait A Million Years". That's still a charting song. It was #75 on the Billboard top 100 for the same year that "Sugar, Sugar" was #1.

That's the kind of adaptation to a maturing audience I was referring to. And it's not a question of my own personal taste. My opinion on this kind of song is based on what I perceive as what fans of hit pop music (like my wife and her friends) would prefer to hear.

The best example of an oldies playlist that does a really good job of reflecting the maturing taste of the audience who likes older pop songs is WJPA-FM in Washington, PA. Their programming is done in-house, not bought from some consultant. Their slogan is "The New Sound of the Oldies", referring to CD quality recordings on FM stereo of old AM hits. They play what the people who were teenagers when the oldies were new would have liked best had they been adults when the oldies were new.

And regarding a "deep cut classic rick format", like any format, it can be done well and it can be done badly. The fact that stations that implemented that format badly failed only proves that a bad implementation will fail. It doesn't prove that the basic concept will automatically fail.
 
It sounds like all the 1980s songs "that were removed by popular demand" are back in the playlist.
 
Lots of details in this thread but bottom line is the station sounds 100 percent better. Tripp West is a huge upside in PM Drive. Station sounds like a million bucks when he's on.
 
Was listening tonight, and the processing sounded terrible. No high end, no low end, and really compressed and loud.
 
jabba17 said:
Was listening tonight, and the processing sounded terrible. No high end, no low end, and really compressed and loud.

IIRC some time ago there was a post about 106.7’s aux transmitter or STL kicking in while the main is still on, and they would “fight” each other and really sound bad. When this happens, nobody at 101.5 knows there is a problem, unless they actually listen to 106.7. I wonder, is this problem is back?
 
What was their problem on the 15th? Was it an ice storm thing?
The signal was full of static and sometimes it sounded like a song
was playing twice at the same time. Are they working off an OLD
transmitter?
 
gregg75 said:
What was their problem on the 15th? Was it an ice storm thing?
The signal was full of static and sometimes it sounded like a song
was playing twice at the same time. Are they working off an OLD
transmitter?
On the 10th, the signal was great but the processing was terrible. What you describe sounds like the time a few months back when they had both the main transmitter and the aux running at the same time, hence the overlap and then the static coming from the aux.
 
jabba17 said:
gregg75 said:
What was their problem on the 15th? Was it an ice storm thing?
The signal was full of static and sometimes it sounded like a song
was playing twice at the same time. Are they working off an OLD
transmitter?
On the 10th, the signal was great but the processing was terrible. What you describe sounds like the time a few months back when they had both the main transmitter and the aux running at the same time, hence the overlap and then the static coming from the aux.

IIRC Does not the FCC take a dim view of “uncontrolled” operation of a transmitter?
 
jabba17 said:
gregg75 said:
What was their problem on the 15th? Was it an ice storm thing?
The signal was full of static and sometimes it sounded like a song
was playing twice at the same time. Are they working off an OLD
transmitter?
On the 10th, the signal was great but the processing was terrible. What you describe sounds like the time a few months back when they had both the main transmitter and the aux running at the same time, hence the overlap and then the static coming from the aux.

The aux is now on the Shepard tower with Kicks back up site.
 
TheMusicMan said:
Yep. Tripp's a great jock and I'm really glad he landed in this market.

They have a night opening. Would love follow Tripp on the air every night. :)
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom