The thing that perplexes me to the point of it being shocking, is that, for the life of me, I cannot figure out why Randy (if, in fact, "kabrich" is Randy<and I believe he is>)posts anything. He doesn't have anything to prove. I can't imagine him needing the ego gratification, and, if he did, there are certainly bigger and broader platforms on which to achieve a bigger grat "buzz" than RadioInfo.com. Could it be because he truly is trying to clarify broadcast issues that affect the rest of us. I mean, he has provoked debate on this thread and others since he started posting in 9/07. In the spirit of posting on a public forum, we, as posters, often do complain and bemoan the fact that bigger corporations (whether they be broadcast entities or a broadcast ratings company) do things without keeping us(the little guy) in the loop or in mind. The thought has occurred to me that he spurs debate to get us to either come to the same opinion as his or to form an opinion of our own to begin with. I honestly believe Randy does not care what we think of him, nor does he have to get credit for ideas that are his or that he fosters or engenders(i.e. spin counts and their superior picture of what is being played), and he does not care a whit about winning the Nobel Prize for broadcast programming theory, I can promise you that. I can only think that he posts to elevate the level of the conversation to that of understanding what is happening in broadcasting before it stops happening and we start complaining about the way things are again(when we can do very little about it). I think we could learn a lot about what he is saying instead of how he is saying it, otherwise, I cannot think of any motivation for him to post at all.
(this might actually be a thread in and of itself).