radiogeek40208 said:
kyscott said:
radiohawkins said:
Does any think WAKY will ever beat WRKA?
Any reason why the powers that be are trying to take WAKY head to head with WRKA? WAKY isn't even a Louisville station. I can't hear them out here in LaGrange, but I can hear RKA. So why would I bother with WAKY? I don't understand that one.
Actually WAKY is a Louisville station.. the studios are in Radcliff, but, the tower is now in Bullitt County.. it's just as much as a Louisville branded station as WRVI with a tower in Valley Station or WSFR with a tower out in Corydon...
You have no idea what you're talking about, but let me help you. WSFR's tower isn't in Corydon. It's on the hill above Caesar's, and if you've ever been on it (I have) then you know that you can see downtown Louisville quite clearly.
WRVI's tower is also in Indiana, not Valley Station. It's on the same ridge as WSFR, about 3 miles farther south. I've never been on their new tower, but I was on both their old ones, which are very close to the new one. It's the same deal... a good view of Louisville.
WAKY's main signal is in Bullitt County all right... Lebanon Junction to be specific. I'm sure the view from their tower is breathtaking, but I'll bet you can't see Louisville from there. It's
26 miles from the WRKA and WPTI antennas, because that is the minimum distance seperation required between WAKY and both WRKA and WPTI per FCC rules. That is NOTHING like WSFR and WRVI. And that's why 103.5 will never be competetive in this market on any kind of sustained basis.
WAKY covers Louisville with a 100 watt on channel booster just southwest of the Gene Snyder Freeway and I-65. They can market that as a Louisville station all they want to (and they have for 15 years) but it's just not. It can't be.