• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Radio-One Selling KKBT?

> > Right and when was the last time LA had an active rock
> > station?or even a current based rock station (other than
> > Kroq) it would have been either of those stations I
> > mentioned, 15 years ago correct but since they were the
> last
> > to do it it is hardly irrelevant, what a mindless comment
> > for you to make.
>
> The relevance of rock stations 15 to 20 years ago (KNAC died
> in early 1995) today is zero. The market has changed
> demographically to such an extent that any data or analyis
> from that time is, as I said, irrelevant.
>
> Looking at rockers from the 80's and 90's is like looking at
> KIIS when it first started... when it was a disco station.
> > they still are the voice of the
> > black
> > > > community throughout America
> > >
> > > With just 60 stations? No way.
> >
> > You find me a larger African American operated broadcast
> > company.....right....there isnt one, that is the
> > point.......Clear Channel and CBS may own more urban
> > stations (which Im not sure if that is even correct)
>
> If you include gospel, Clear and Radio One are tied. Quite a
> few Radio One stations are not African-American targeted, by
> the way. They have a CHR in Minneapolis, a brokered talker
> in Miami, a Spanish station in Houston, etc., etc.
>
> > but
> > they're in it to make a buck, theye doing urban because it
>
> > tests where they're doing it. Radio One on the other hand
> > while definately tring to make money believes (true or
> not)
> > that they are serving the community, the black community,
> so
> > 60 stations is 60 more than any other African American
> > broadcast company.
>
> Radio One is also in it for the money. They are, like SBS,
> UVN, and Entravision, mostly concentrated in one area
> formatically. The three publically owned Hispanic groups
> also know that when you program to such an audience,
> community service is of the essence. Doing community
> service, as shown by WDIA through multiple owners (and guess
> who owns them now?) is the key to such formats. Radio One
> did not invent service to the Black community... they just
> recognized the need for it as proven by others back to when
> such stations advertised in Broadcasting as "Memphis' race
> station." (Early 50's)
>
> > There really is no point for you to argue
> > so why are you attempting to?. Plus likemost you probably
> > have an exaggerated idea of just how many blacks are in
> this
> > country, it is a small percentage of the overall
> demographic
> > of America, smaller than you would think,m anywhere from 8
>
> > to 14 percent PERIOD.
>
> There are precise counts of African Americans, updated to
> 2005, on the U.S. Census website. Blacks are 13.4% of the
> population or 39.2 million. Hispanics, the largest minority
> group, are approaching 14%.
>
> I do not have an exaggerated idea of how many of anything
> there is in the US, right down to working John Deere
> tractors, as there are plenty of reliable statistical
> sources for nearly every characteristic of the US
> population. There is no need to say that the Black
> population is "naywhere from 8 to 14 percent" when exact
> numbers exist (and your 8% would undercount by nearly 18
> million people!)
> >
> > DUDE get a clue, I work in a major, top five market too
> > but I also know that if you actually get out into AMERICA,
>
> > see if you say "whatever" Most Americans arent in the
> > sophisticated cities, they shop at wal mart, etc and live
> a
> > pretty low key life, the major cities are not
> > representattive of America unfortunately.
>
> Big cities for the average middle class or blue collar
> worker tend to be more like lots of small cities glued
> together.
>
> I work in markets ranging from Harlingen, TX to some outside
> the US that are larger than New York's metro. And I have
> worked in markets ranging from Lake City, FL (less than 20
> thousand) and Lago Agrio, Ecuador (same) to Mexico City (23
> million). Generally, I have found that people all walk on
> two legs, put their shoes on one foot at a time and are more
> similar than different all over.
>
> > There are more
> > tiny hamlets than big cities in this country and thats
> where
> > middle American culture is, the culture that most media
> > outlets on a national sacle cater to. whhat about that
> dont
> > you get??
>
> Who, other than you, said I did not get it? Even if you work
> in a big market, listeners listen one set of ears at a time.
>
Oh man this is just getting tedious.

No he suggested that a station should flip active and flank or challange Kroq ( I dont think that would be a good idea myself but) and that the last time that there was some form of current based rock in LA besides KROQ were the stations in question, so the more you say they're "irrelevant" the more it seems you just want to argue. I get what he's saying that nobody has tried it since then and that maybe it's time that someone should,, Theres indie but theyre not really targeting the mainstream rock dude listener now are they?.....,,do I agree with his rationale?? not really but saying that the stations he referenced were 15 years ago and so they're irrelevant doesnt make sense since they're the only ones to have tried it in the last 20 years, I dont understand what your hang up is with that concept.

True the black population is around 13 percent so he ssaid between 8 and 14 percent because he was not exactly certain, whats the crime?..........I dont know dude, the guy made some valid points and you just seem determined to argue for arguments sake. You're entitled to your opiion too which I respect but I dont think you're even really listening to what he was saying, always a mistake in my experience.

But again this is all meaningless since no one has said anything about Radio oen selling KKBT other than the person who began this thread.
 
Re: Another one dispelled.

> >
> I get what Frish is saying, David Eduardo; in my OPINION
> was very premature in jumping on him in the way in which he
> did. For clarification I am an Afircan American broadcaster,
> I work in New York, and I completely agree with what Frish
> was saying for the most part. Look Radio One is a black
> owned and operated company and it is true that unlike CC or
> any other corporation they have more of a commitment to the
> black community ad while CC etc may have more Gospel and
> Urban stations than Radio One they're operating those
> formats becuase they're good business and thats all.

OK, point taken. But it is wrong. Radio One is significantly Black operated, but not exclusively (unless Mary catherine is suddenly a sister). And it is very definitely not black owned. Over half the outstanding shares are owned by mutual funds and investment banks, in fact.

> They
> researched the markets there was a hole for those formats
> and they put them on, period. Radio One on the other hand
> being a company that is owned by blacks has more of a
> commitment to said community and they would go into a
> smaller market if they felt there was a large enough black
> community that they can attract not just for business sake
> but because they want to serve that community.

Agian, the company is not Black owned. Just 100 mutual funds own 25 million shares, or a quarter of the total shares. Add in other institutional investors, and you hav emore than half the shares outstanding.

Radio One is a publically traded company, and broadly owned.

> So I'll say America is more
> realistically like "MoM cant find you", Nebraska, than it is
> NYC, LA etc..........are we more comfortable with that?

I see your point, except that rural areas are losing ground and cities growing. As menitoned in a different post, two-thirds of the US lives in the top 100 metro areas, in fact. In big cities, not in Pig Roast, Arkansas.

> David he's correct that Pirate and KNAC are the last time
> that anyone tried active rock in La (if Im wrong please
> correct me) therefore they are far from irrelevant my man
> even if it was a few yeasr ago it was the last time right?.

Pirate went away nearly 20 years ago, and KNAC 11 years and two months ago. Disco went away 35 years ago, and I do not see anyone making claims about a market based on Patrick Hernandez' music.

LA, since the demise of Pirate, has gone from being about 30% ethnic to nearly 65% ethnic (42% Hispanic, 12% Asian and 10% Black) plus having another 10% of Armenian, Iranian, Russian and other immigrant groups that likely underindex in interest for hard American rock.

So, any comparison with times past in LA is irrelvant due to demographics.

> ANYWAY THIS IS ALL MOOT SINCE NOBODY IS SELLING KKBT TO
> BEGIN WITH!
>

We agree. Radio One will sell KROI, Mppls, Miami, etc., before selling in LA.
 
Re: KROQ

> > 2. Clear Channel has no interest in operating a format
> that
> > has zero growth potential in Los Angeles, Mexico.
>
> What is your reasoning as to the flip on Star? I don't see
> that the new format has a high Hispanic appeal ...
>

One, I would not call it a flip. It's a "format adjustment".

Two. KROQ has a decent english as primary language Hispanic appeal but that is besides the point. It's obvious, ego. Gotta knock some revenue off the top station in the market. Clear Channel L.A. can't allow any other company to have those crowing rights. And, if the adjustment works, will help continue the so called "wall of women" for CCLA.

Personally, I don't care for the new Star (note the logo doesn't include the word "Star")
 
Re: Misconceptions dispelled

> >
> > None of the above sir, there is nothing racist or
> offensive
> > about it. The reality is that regardless of color, America
>
> > is basically the places that are not the big cities, and
> > there are plenty of white folks in "Swamp fox South
> > Carolina" ETC . Why do you think that so much of the
> media's
> > energy is spent appealing to "middle America"? becauuse
> the
> > majority of people in this coutry arent really in the
> > cities,
>
> Let's look at that.
>
> Of the 12+ population of the USA, which is just under 250
> million as of the Claritas 2005 projection, here is what we
> have...
>
> Top 20 metros: 92 million or nearly 40% of the total
> Top 40 metros: 121 million or half the population total.
> Top 50 metros: 134 million or nearly 60% of the total.
>
> In fact, two thirds of the US population is in the top 100
> metros.

NO NO NO what I was saying was that numbers are numbers yes however the general consensus of most media outlets seems to be that middle America is the target much more so than the inner cities in terms of what they think people want to see/hear. That is why networks etc always fear that "such and such wont play well in middle America". If you think that the big city represents more of Americas essence than the small town then we agree to disagree. Im fine with that whereas you dont seem to be.
>
> So much for that.
>
> > Having
> > workd for Radio one I can tell you that it is true that if
>
> > there is a large black population in a given market Radio
> > one sees it as a viablee place to be, it makes sense
> what's
> > stereotyped or racist about that?....
>
> What is stereotypical is your portrayal of Radio One as THE
> voice of Black America, which it is not. And your inference
> that only a Black owned group can speak for or to this
> group.
>

I SAID NEITHER you completely misread me, I didnt characterize radio One as the voice of Black America I did say that their mission statement is to serve as A VOICE TO, AND OF the black community not THE voice of the Black community. You stated that clear channel and other companies CBS etc operate more gospel and or Urban stations than radio one, well yes becuause they OWN more stations than radio one but their motives for operating those formats is purely profilt and nothing more. Radio One on the other hand as part of their mission statement being a black owned and run company is to serve the black community from a public service PSA perspective as well, whereas CC isnt in it for that. if they are operating an urban station they are doing so because its profitable and thats all, radio one has a bit more of a personal stake in that community which is admireable. By the way were not even talking about Urban leaning chr's like Power etc, (owened by Emmis I knwo) but died in the wool URBAn radio,....those Churbans are listened to mostly by white suburban-ites anway as are they the largest purchasers of rap music etc, Urban radio is targettd more pointedly to the Afriacn American community..... WHY are you taking issue with that?. I also did not claim that only a black owned group could speak to or for the black community, however do you debate that they are more predisposed to do so than say Clear Channel? that's not even worth wasting time arguing. Enough of the pedantic responses to everything David.
 
Re: Misconceptions dispelled

Why do you insist on typing a long, run-on paragraph in reply to David's short statements?

To paraphrase Shakespeare, you doth protest too much.

And run-on paragraphs are incredibly hard to read (Notorious should take note of that as well); even if there is a valid defense in there someplace, a lot of people aren't going to take the time to look for it.<P ID="signature">______________


</P>
 
Re: Another one dispelled.

> > >
> > I get what Frish is saying, David Eduardo; in my OPINION
> > was very premature in jumping on him in the way in which
> he
> > did. For clarification I am an Afircan American
> broadcaster,
> > I work in New York, and I completely agree with what Frish
>
> > was saying for the most part. Look Radio One is a black
> > owned and operated company and it is true that unlike CC
> or
> > any other corporation they have more of a commitment to
> the
> > black community ad while CC etc may have more Gospel and
> > Urban stations than Radio One they're operating those
> > formats becuase they're good business and thats all.
>
> OK, point taken. But it is wrong. Radio One is significantly
> Black operated, but not exclusively (unless Mary catherine
> is suddenly a sister). And it is very definitely not black
> owned. Over half the outstanding shares are owned by mutual
> funds and investment banks, in fact.
>
> > They
> > researched the markets there was a hole for those formats
> > and they put them on, period. Radio One on the other hand
> > being a company that is owned by blacks has more of a
> > commitment to said community and they would go into a
> > smaller market if they felt there was a large enough black
>
> > community that they can attract not just for business sake
>
> > but because they want to serve that community.
>
> Agian, the company is not Black owned. Just 100 mutual funds
> own 25 million shares, or a quarter of the total shares. Add
> in other institutional investors, and you hav emore than
> half the shares outstanding.
>
> Radio One is a publically traded company, and broadly owned.
>
>
> > So I'll say America is more
> > realistically like "MoM cant find you", Nebraska, than it
> is
> > NYC, LA etc..........are we more comfortable with that?
>
> I see your point, except that rural areas are losing ground
> and cities growing. As menitoned in a different post,
> two-thirds of the US lives in the top 100 metro areas, in
> fact. In big cities, not in Pig Roast, Arkansas.
>
> > David he's correct that Pirate and KNAC are the last time
> > that anyone tried active rock in La (if Im wrong please
> > correct me) therefore they are far from irrelevant my man
> > even if it was a few yeasr ago it was the last time
> right?.
>
> Pirate went away nearly 20 years ago, and KNAC 11 years and
> two months ago. Disco went away 35 years ago, and I do not
> see anyone making claims about a market based on Patrick
> Hernandez' music.
>
> LA, since the demise of Pirate, has gone from being about
> 30% ethnic to nearly 65% ethnic (42% Hispanic, 12% Asian and
> 10% Black) plus having another 10% of Armenian, Iranian,
> Russian and other immigrant groups that likely underindex in
> interest for hard American rock.
>
> So, any comparison with times past in LA is irrelvant due to
> demographics.
>
> > ANYWAY THIS IS ALL MOOT SINCE NOBODY IS SELLING KKBT TO
> > BEGIN WITH!
> >
>
> We agree. Radio One will sell KROI, Mppls, Miami, etc.,
> before selling in LA.
>
Oh dude seriously give it a rest for god's sake!. Ok they're a publicaly traded company,Ok white poeple own shares of them, and I as a black person own shares of CBS, whatever man you get the point, theyre a black owned black operated company for the most part, jesus I doubt that Alfred Liggins would agree with most of what else you've said. By the way: I believe Mary Catherine IS a sister!...LOL......Im sure you'll have time to go and look up radio one's board of directors etc, I on the other hand do not so here endeth the lesson.

Enough with your being a nudge man.
 
Mary Catherine Sneed

> > Radio One is
> > significantly
> > Black operated, but not exclusively (unless Mary catherine
> > is suddenly a sister).

> By the way:
> I believe Mary Catherine IS a sister!...LOL......

Oh, look ... no, she isn't.

http://www.nab.org/conventions/radioshow/2004/SessionDetail.asp?id=1202346

Oh, and while you're there, look why David Eduardo Gleason knew that, and you didn't.

Credibility level dropping fast ...<P ID="signature">______________


</P>
 
Re: Mary Catherine Sneed

> > > Radio One is
> > > significantly
> > > Black operated, but not exclusively (unless Mary
> catherine
> > > is suddenly a sister).
>
> > By the way:
> > I believe Mary Catherine IS a sister!...LOL......
>
> Oh, look ... no, she isn't.
>
http://www.nab> .org/conventions/radioshow/2004/SessionDetail.asp?id=1202346
>
>
> Oh, and while you're there, look why David Eduardo Gleason
> knew that, and you didn't.
>
> Credibility level dropping fast ...
>

UHHHHHHHH I was actually joking hence the (LOL) after the comment about her being a "sister". I have the internet too and can look such things up though apparantly the joke wasnt funny. You have my apology for that.
 
> Who, other than you, said I did not get it? Even if you work
> in a big market, listeners listen one set of ears at a time.
>

and large markets are made up of MANY neighborhoods...
the mind-set is the same<P ID="signature">______________
but wait...there's more!</P>
 
Re: Misconceptions dispelled

>
> NO NO NO what I was saying was that numbers are numbers yes
> however the general consensus of most media outlets seems to
> be that middle America is the target much more so than the
> inner cities in terms of what they think people want to
> see/hear. That is why networks etc always fear that "such
> and such wont play well in middle America".

"Middle America" is more of a value set than geography. Middle America to most is everthing that is not NY or LA.

> If you think
> that the big city represents more of Americas essence than
> the small town then we agree to disagree. Im fine with that
> whereas you dont seem to be.

Most of America does not live in small towns, and has not since just after W.W. II. Today, if you go to the 200 biggest metros, you have about 78% of the US population.

If anything, city life represents the essence of America today.
>
> I SAID NEITHER you completely misread me, I didnt
> characterize radio One as the voice of Black America I did
> say that their mission statement is to serve as A VOICE TO,
> AND OF the black community not THE voice of the Black
> community.

You could have fooled me. Your statement seemed to say that Radio One uniquely represented the Black community, which is the same thing.

> You stated that clear channel and other companies
> CBS etc operate more gospel and or Urban stations than radio
> one, well yes becuause they OWN more stations than radio one
> but their motives for operating those formats is purely
> profilt and nothing more. Radio One on the other hand as
> part of their mission statement being a black owned and run
> company is to serve the black community from a public
> service PSA perspective as well, whereas CC isnt in it for
> that.

Well, start with the fact that Radio One is not Black owned and take it from there. Radio One plays to wall Street just as much as any other public corporation, and the only difference is that ethnic stations, be they Black or Hispanic or Iranian targeted all know that community service is part of all formats. Radio One did not invent that... stations like WDIA and KCOR and KGBT did.

> if they are operating an urban station they are doing
> so because its profitable and thats all, radio one has a
> bit more of a personal stake in that community which is
> admireable. By the way were not even talking about Urban
> leaning chr's like Power etc, (owened by Emmis I knwo) but
> died in the wool URBAn radio,....those Churbans are listened
> to mostly by white suburban-ites anway as are they the
> largest purchasers of rap music etc, Urban radio is targettd
> more pointedly to the Afriacn American community.....

If you are talking about Power 106 in LA, keep in mind that the listenrship is less than 20% non-ethnic. The station is Hispanic, Black and, then, non-Hispanic white. Were LA to have more than a 9% Black population, Power would have a greater percentage of Black listening.

Power 106 is hardly CHR.

> WHY
> are you taking issue with that?.

Becuause, as you have just proven with Power 106, you are just about 100% wrong.

> I also did not claim that
> only a black owned group could speak to or for the black
> community, however do you debate that they are more
> predisposed to do so than say Clear Channel?

Nope. Clear Channel is a smart group, and they know they have to be community oriented in that area of broadcasting. In this cases, it really does not matter who owns the company... what matters is the local management and air talent and so on.

> that's not
> even worth wasting time arguing. Enough of the pedantic
> responses to everything David.

So, contradicting you with facts is being pedantic? Wow. I did not know that.
 
Re: Another one dispelled.

> >
> Oh dude seriously give it a rest for god's sake!.

The problem is that you are posting wrong information. Stop doing it, and I stop answering you.

> Ok they're
> a publicaly traded company,Ok white poeple own shares of
> them, and I as a black person own shares of CBS, whatever
> man you get the point, theyre a black owned black operated
> company for the most part,

About 75% of Radio One shares are not Black owned. That hardly qualifies as being "for the most part."

> jesus I doubt that Alfred Liggins
> would agree with most of what else you've said.

I actually think he would. Radio One is a business, predominantly managed by African Americans because the goal of the company is to establish a niche in that sector.

General Electric does not build planes, but it is in the aviation business as the largest manufacturer of jet turbines. They staked out a niche, or sector, in the aviation industry, but do not build planes. Similarly, Radio One has focused on one area where they believe they can excel. Good for them for recognizing a prudent strategy.

> By the way:
> I believe Mary Catherine IS a sister!...LOL......Im sure
> you'll have time to go and look up radio one's board of
> directors etc, I on the other hand do not so here endeth the
> lesson.

Mary Catherine, who was on the NAB programming pannel with me two years ago, is whiter than I am. Thanks for playing, though.
>
> Enough with your being a nudge man.
>

Whatever that menas...
 
> Radio One has around 60 something stations in about 20
> markets (several of which, like Minneapolis and Miami are
> not Black).

Not to nullify the point that Radio One does own non-African American targetted stations, but their Miami station, formerly brokered 1080-WVCG, flipped to their African American talk network as WTPS in January.
 
WTPS

> If you include gospel, Clear and Radio One are tied. Quite a
> few Radio One stations are not African-American targeted, by
> the way. They have a CHR in Minneapolis, a brokered talker
> in Miami, a Spanish station in Houston, etc., etc.

I thought R1's only Miami AM, 1080, flipped to urban talk. Do they own another station or is it brokered from 7pm-6am?
 
> > Radio One has around 60 something stations in about 20
> > markets (several of which, like Minneapolis and Miami are
> > not Black).
>
> Not to nullify the point that Radio One does own non-African
> American targetted stations, but their Miami station,
> formerly brokered 1080-WVCG, flipped to their African
> American talk network as WTPS in January.

Thank you. I missed that, and even BIA missed that. Probably a good move in that market.
>
 
> > > Radio One has around 60 something stations in about 20
> > > markets (several of which, like Minneapolis and Miami
> are
> > > not Black).
> >
> > Not to nullify the point that Radio One does own
> non-African
> > American targetted stations, but their Miami station,
> > formerly brokered 1080-WVCG, flipped to their African
> > American talk network as WTPS in January.
>
> Thank you. I missed that, and even BIA missed that. Probably
> a good move in that market... although I was told that about 30% of Miami dade Blacks speak Kreyol, not English.
> >
>
 
Re: WTPS

> > If you include gospel, Clear and Radio One are tied. Quite
> a
> > few Radio One stations are not African-American targeted,
> by
> > the way. They have a CHR in Minneapolis, a brokered talker
>
> > in Miami, a Spanish station in Houston, etc., etc.
>
> I thought R1's only Miami AM, 1080, flipped to urban talk.
> Do they own another station or is it brokered from 7pm-6am?
>

No, as I was advised in another reply, they switched that one to the new talk net in February. Not even BIA had that right.
 
> > Got any loose change Clear Channel? Why not buy back KKBT
> > from Radio 1-since they obviously can't get it together.
> > Although, KKBT started their nose dive in the late 90s
> when
> > Michelle S came back, as long as Clear Channel doesn't
> > rehire her, CC could fix the Beat up real nice-like by
> > sending Martin and Archer to the rescue....
>
>
> Just when I think I'm out, they keep pulling me back IN...
> :)
>


Archer, I think they're talking about Jazzy Jim Archer from KYLD San Francisco.<P ID="signature">______________
Happy 20th Birthday Power 106

JOSH, Moderating the whole Radio-Info radio state of California and Indiana too!

www.myspace.com/radiogeek500</P>
 
> Got any loose change Clear Channel? Why not buy back KKBT
> from Radio 1-since they obviously can't get it together.
> Although, KKBT started their nose dive in the late 90s when
> Michelle S came back, as long as Clear Channel doesn't
> rehire her, CC could fix the Beat up real nice-like by
> sending Martin and Archer to the rescue....
> What do you think?
>
Looks like Tom Joyner is coming to KKBT! Yawn!
 
> Looks like Tom Joyner is coming to KKBT! Yawn!

Gee, Allison, ya think?

Maybe because the thread above this one discusses that?<P ID="signature">______________


</P>
 
> CC could fix the Beat up real nice-like by
> sending Martin and Archer to the rescue....
> What do you think?
>


lets see if Archer can fix Wild up in San Francisco first....
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom