lash said:
Lease that Lexus David. Proud that mine is paid for.
Big deal. 4 to one trade? You were the one bragging about the car. I don't want a Lexus, and don't lease... I was just showing that a Lexus today is not an expensive car.
Several of the FM talkers that you mentioned are simulcasts of their AM counterparts. Those AM's have the ratings, but Clear Channel and the rest are either to cheap or to stupid to program something else, so the quick and easy way is to simulcast them.
Actually, the FM talkers are transitions if they are still on AM at all.
KTAR in Phoenix kept the AM in a simulcast after putting n/t on FM, but will drop it for sports on AM January 1. In 3 months, they have more than doubled the 25-54 numbers on the format, going from below 15th to 7th in that key demo.
WTOP in DC totally dropped AM upon moving to FM, and saw a huge increase in 35-54, which means improved sales.
KSL in Salt Lake City has noted a huge improvement in 25-54, and they may use the AM for a different format soon.
New Orleans is a brand new sign on, competing with WWL; the success of Clear's FM talker in Pittsburgh has shown them they can take on the old-line AMs and win in 25-54.
Tallahassee is a total move to FM. Dayton and Jacksonville are transitions, where the AM will eventually drop the format. In every case, a huge spike in 25-54 has been generated, making the prospects for this becoming a fast-moving trend even more probable.
So lets review all of David's posts. AM is dead, except for a few talk stations. No other formats can work anywhere on AM. Local Sports are a waste and make no money on AM stations.
That is not what I said and you know it. If the only way you can defend AM is by twisting my posts, then I have proven my case quite amply.
FM is where its at. But, mostly ethnic formated FM's in major cities, programmed and researched by David.
I did not, of course, say that, either. If you are trying to be funny or sarcastic, use an emoticon... since your humor is not very apparent.
So I'll say it. I program, own and run American AM radio stations.
And I program and run American AM and FM radio stations. So what?
Who would want to compete with you, really?
I wouldn't program an ethnic format if I was down to my last dollar.
My first job was with an "r&b" station in 1959. I am immensely proud of having begun in what you demeaningly call "ethnic radio." At the time, many did not think well of the Black audience we served... but we prospered and we were very influential in the times of Orvil Faubus, George Wallace and the Reverend King. "We will overcome" became a fait acomplit with a lot of help from the Black (or "ethnic" as you like to call it) audience.
In the 60's, there was nothing more noble than working for an "ethnic" station and helping a community that had been discriminated against. Today, working with US Hispanic stations has much in common; these stations are a voice as well as entertainment for the 42 million
American Hispanics.
And if programmed right, with the right format and personalities, an AM can still beat one of the poorly programmed stations owned by CC, Entercom or any of the big media jerks.
No, it can't. There is not one iota of proof that this can or ever has been done.
The world of radio is not going to be saved by your ethnic programming. Please stop pushing it down our throats.
Well, at least we know that you are a bigot. That explains a lot towards understanding your attitude. Depending on how you define "ethnic" (and I think I am better off
not knowing your definition), about a third of Americans today are "ethnic" if you only count Arabs, Persians, Asians, Hispanics and Blacks. That is a major part of America, and one not desrving of your dismissal and demeaning attitude.