All request radio? Pride/LGBTQ radio? On a main signal? In Buffalo?
is that a NOAll request radio? Pride/LGBTQ radio? On a main signal? In Buffalo?
Well....... she only commented on COUNTRY and ultimately, it's not her decision. She has input AND invested interest as she is valuable to the company however.....
format change is still a possibility.
Can really make " entercomm" nervous
a hybrid between wkse snd wtss ?
oh wait, audacity has s monopoly on that and may have a knee jerk decision they normally wouldn't want to make :
kiss & Star unchallenged is the way this market wants it.... if they flip to
wild 103 ( a nod to their attempt several years ago ), okay many moons ago,
they can force the competition's hand as well as make wblk annoyed
Nor am I. But while Pride and Channel Q can be found on HD subchannels, the format is, by its nature, not mass appeal. As for request shows, they almost always end up being dominated by regular callers -- some of whom request the same song every time, some of whom delight in asking for stiffs and obscure tracks. It might be fun on a Sunday night but its appeal would fade quickly as a 24/7 format.is that a NO
?
I'm asking because I'm *not in the industry.
All request radio? Pride/LGBTQ radio? On a main signal? In Buffalo?
IMO I'd say this type of terrestrial station devoted to that particular segment of the market would be tough to keep afloat. According to this article from 2021, about 5.6% of the US population identifies as LGBT, and the breakdown within that 5.6% is further fractured: LGBT Identification Rises to 5.6% in Latest U.S. Estimate Consider how many terrestrial stations that are supposedly mass appeal, have well-planned formats and solid on-air staff and good sales departments have failed for whatever reason...Then try and make that type of model work when the demographic its aimed at is composed of just 6% or less of the population. Seems like a tall order.is that a NO
?
I'm asking because I'm *not in the industry.
A Simulcast is running the same Programming on two signals. Moving S & R to another station is essentially the same thing, unless their show will be much different. There's no guarantee that listeners will follow them to the new location. Have you read many of the Social Media comments?That's an apples and oranges comparison. A simulcast != moving a show from one station to the other. You're grasping at straws here.
Ask yourself this: what demographic did S&R pull at WEDG? Now, I think it's safe to say a vast majority of their audience will move to WGRF, supplementing the existing demographic.
They have been at WEDG for a lot of their demographic to age out of the newer alt that gets played on WEDG. If WGRF leans more into playing more 90's rock (i.e. Pearl Jam, Nirvana, Foo Fighters, Alice in Chains, Smashing Pumpkins, etc.), I think that will appease both audiences. It's also a logical progression for classic rock stations to do.
Clearly everyone else disagrees with your latter point. The listening public does not care about what radio nerds and forum people think.
Now, with all that said: Generally curious what will happen musically at both stations. I do believe there will be some tweaks to add more of the aforementioned 90's rock to GRF, but it will be interesting to see how the two stations are counterprogrammed.
... on two signals simultaneously. That's why it's a simulcast. It is not "essentially the same thing". And again, they're successful because of what their show is, not because of the signal it's on.A Simulcast is running the same Programming on two signals. Moving S & R to another station is essentially the same thing, unless their show will be much different.
No one said anything would be guaranteed but there is good reason to believe that the vast majority of their listeners will follow them to 97 Rock. And yes, I did find the 3 or 4 Facebook comments of unhappy people. I would not call that an acceptable sample size to come to the conclusion that everyone is angry/upset with this move, nor is S&R on 97 Rock destined for failure or whatever you're trying to argue. People don't like change at first but in most cases they come around to accept it.There's no guarantee that listeners will follow them to the new location. Have you read many of the Social Media comments?
We're aware of the former point, but it gives The Edge a chance to reinvent itself as it now is the sole alternative station in the market. I do not believe they will go syndicated in mornings as that strategy has not worked out for WBUF, and the in-house Westwood One options don't seem to fit the bill for the demographic of WEDG.Any "New" listeners will come at the expense of The Edge. That station will sink further. This move doesn't create growth. The Radio ships are sinking, so Cumulus is using 97 Rock as the lifeboat hoping to survive a while longer...
You don't know that 97 Rock WILL get higher ratings. That's speculation. Unless you work there, you don't know if the playlist will be changed in any noticeable way. 97 Rock is not about musical progress. It's way too late in the game to change the image of this station.... on two signals simultaneously. That's why it's a simulcast. It is not "essentially the same thing". And again, they're successful because of what their show is, not because of the signal it's on.
We're aware of the former point, but it gives The Edge a chance to reinvent itself as it now is the sole alternative station in the market. I do not believe they will go syndicated in mornings as that strategy has not worked out for WBUF, and the in-house Westwood One options don't seem to fit the bill for the demographic of WEDG.
WGRF will grow in both audience following S&R there, as well as musically progress to add more 90's rock or even early 2000's as other classic rock stations will, to no detriment of ratings or success in the market. I would be strongly surprised if the music mix did not change as a result of this move.
I never mentioned higher ratings. My point is that it the ratings won't be negatively affected by the new morning show, and that the station would continue to be successful irrespective of the morning show change.You don't know that 97 Rock WILL get higher ratings. That's speculation. Unless you work there, you don't know if the playlist will be changed in any noticeable way. 97 Rock is not about musical progress. It's way too late in the game to change the image of this station.
I know they are not simulcasting S & R on both stations. The point was that S & R is not a new product. It's just been moved to a different aisle...
Read your post. "WGRF will grow in audience"... That's what you wrote.I never mentioned higher ratings. My point is that it the ratings won't be negatively affected by the new morning show, and that the station would continue to be successful irrespective of the morning show change.
Cumulus isn't trying to change the image of the station either, and you're being ignorant if you're going to say that 97 Rock won't add (at minimum) 90's rock to their playlist in increased frequency, as nearly every other classic rock station has. 90's rock is becoming classic rock whether you accept that fact personally or not.
AgreeRead your post. "WGRF will grow in audience"... That's what you wrote.
As for adding 90s music to the playlist, what are they waiting for? 1991 was 30 years ago. 97 Rock is the Zeppelin, Floyd, Skynryd station. I don't listen (I've looked at the online playlist). I don't see any 90s tracks. The average 97 Rock listener must live in a Time Warp. They'll be shocked when "New" bands like Nirvana and Pearl Jam are on the playlist...
I'm aware of what I wrote. What's factually incorrect about the fact that WGRF will get new listeners from S&R, as in their audience moving there. Does that mean that their ratings will substantially increase? Most likely not. Will the station magically start outperforming WYRK or WBLK? No. But SirRoxalot is correct: the station is already doing well, and by moving S&R there has the chance of allowing the station to shift their demo.Read your post. "WGRF will grow in audience"... That's what you wrote.
If I had to guess it's likely their fear of cannibalizing the ratings of WEDG. They are playing 90's songs from Petty, Ozzy, GNR, etc., but haven't played grunge bands (having actually listened to the station). But then again, this is a smaller market and they likely didn't want to mess with success. It's never too late and it's ignorant to think it won't happen and that, as you probably see it, that everything will fail and die because The Lake, the greatest format in Buffalo radio history, was offed years ago.As for adding 90s music to the playlist, what are they waiting for? 1991 was 30 years ago.
Not really. Using the Apr-May-Jun book, they are 4th overall, 4th in 18-24 and 18-34, 5th in 18-49, 3rd in 25-54, 5th in 35-44 and 3rd in 35-64.. Yes, they have some 55+ but they perform very well in all the subsets.97-Rock doesn't need to grow its audience much. It's already Top 5. It does need to shift the demographic because their audience is aging out of the saleable demos.
Pretty decent spread. It appears the station has strong numbers 45-54 and 45-64. WBUF probably sees that as a juicy target... not that it's likely to steal much of it.Not really. Using the Apr-May-Jun book, they are 4th overall, 4th in 18-24 and 18-34, 5th in 18-49, 3rd in 25-54, 5th in 35-44 and 3rd in 35-64.. Yes, they have some 55+ but they perform very well in all the subsets.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Of course, as you've said many times ratings don't guarantee revenue. If things are so swell, there was no need to move The Edge morning show to WGRF. Cumulus is obviously trying to fix something...Not really. Using the Apr-May-Jun book, they are 4th overall, 4th in 18-24 and 18-34, 5th in 18-49, 3rd in 25-54, 5th in 35-44 and 3rd in 35-64.. Yes, they have some 55+ but they perform very well in all the subsets.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.