atwater kent said:
"Roughly comparable," yes. But KIIS' signal, at 8000 watts and 900 meters vs. 4800 watts at 860 meters for KSCA, does have better coverage and penetration.
The difference in the 70 dbu is about 2.5 miles... KIIS reaches 11.2 million in the 70 and KSCA anout 10.6... out of 13.5 million in the MSA. In other words, the folks outside the 70 of either are in deep southern OC or the high desert.
Success for the Spanish format on 101.9, vs the albeit poor AAA programming on KSCA, was possible in good part because of demographically/geographically advantageous signal coverage.
If you cover well all but the lowest part of the OC and the high desert, then the issue is not signal. The issue was not poor programming either, because adequate programming will do fine in the absence of better programming for a niche format. The problem all along was,
simply, the fact that the demographics and ethnicity of LA can not possibly support a AAA format.
KSCA's AAA programming was amateur, unfocused, underfunded and doomed to low numbers.
GWB was haedly underfunded. And most believe that KSCA was appropriate for the LA AAA lifesyle.... there just were not enough potential listeners
The only other attempt at AAA was CC's Channel 103.1 on the vastly inferior signal now occupied by the amateur, unfocused, underfunded and doomed Indy 103.1.
Indie has won more awards than any station of its size for its innovative programming. Saying it is amateur because you don't like it comes across as a cheap shot.