XMportable said:
Neanderpaul said:
Skin pigment of the artist is irrelevant.
Neanderpaul, To most people it may not be revelant. The real question to the market is when is it NOT/Or better when WILL it NOT be revelant ANYMORE? The reality is that skin color has been and still is a factor of radio, they even market to your skin color so why is this a shock to you? ???

???

??? :
The fact is, skin pigment is *only* relevant if
you believe it to be. Any "black artist" that plays *rock* music worthy of airplay on a rock station, receives airplay. Hendrix has been on rock radio for over 40 years. Lenny Kravitz for over 20. Living Colour, Lajon Witherspoon, Fishbone, Bad Brains, Ben Harper, Phil Lynott etc. Now, a legitimate question might be "why are there so few 'black artists' in Rock today?"
I've never, in the 27 years I've done this, *ever* witnessed anyone consider, or exclude any record on any radio station I've ever worked for (and there have been some greats...programmed by greats), based upon skin pigment. In fact, I'm proud to say that I grew up listening to one of the greatest Rock stations in our industry (WBCN) And *they* even regularly employed "black" personalities on a rock station, in one of America's most racist cities...and it worked.
I'd be willing to bet that there's no discussion going on in the Urban/CHR/Hip Hop forum regarding "white artists" in the format.
Race is only an issue, to those who consider race an issue.