The new translator got turned on this afternoon. 107.5 mhz. How is it coming in?
John Kesler
Emmis
John Kesler
Emmis
BobOnTheJob said:That will all change when the 50KW Terre Haute signal returns to 107.5 .
Isnt 107.5 that was in terre haute rumored to be hijacked to northern illinois somewhere. i know i read it somewhere on here that was potentially being talked about. or was that 640PTBoardOp94 said:BobOnTheJob said:That will all change when the 50KW Terre Haute signal returns to 107.5 .
IF 107.5 returns to Terre Haute. Doesn't seem certain that it ever will.
MikeStandardsFromIndiana said:Isnt 107.5 that was in terre haute rumored to be hijacked to northern illinois somewhere. i know i read it somewhere on here that was potentially being talked about. or was that 640PTBoardOp94 said:BobOnTheJob said:That will all change when the 50KW Terre Haute signal returns to 107.5 .
IF 107.5 returns to Terre Haute. Doesn't seem certain that it ever will.
Rosebud3 said:February 10, 2013
The FCC told the three churches envolved in 107.5 Mhz to come to an agreement and stop fighting. The 107.5 Mhz. tower has been up for years but whether a transmitter is at the original WBOQ site is unknown. I look for the FCC to step in and perhaps even re-award the CP. Terre Haute has four colleges and for public radio we have to listen to a translator of WFIU from Bloomington, Indiana. Paul Ford does a nice job with protestant religious radio with three stations in Terre Haute and Covenant Ministries also does well with Catholic programming with WHOJ. What I am saying is the three churches that cannot agree, are going to have a tough time getting listeners
By the way, the 640 Khz. move to a suburb of Chicago decision has been postponed for six months at the request of Birach Broadcasting. In the letter that I received from Birach Broadcasting's attorney, an environmental study is to be made. My thoughts and this is only my opinion is that Birach may be trying to sell the CP because of recent changes in the Terre Haute radio market which is now a duopoly. Also, there was a FCC clarification letter about moving frequencies from one city to another that did not look favorable to Birach.
Is that one even on the air? Isn't that the one that ran a dead carrier for a year or two & then shut it off?Lawppy said:I wonder how the folks at WHHC-LP in New Castle feel about this.![]()
BobOnTheJob said:Is that one even on the air? Isn't that the one that ran a dead carrier for a year or two & then shut it off?
WFNI and WIBC HD2 are two different entities. All they need to do is make sure that whatever is on WIBC HD2 is also on the translator.MacOConnor said:I hear WFNI's plan is to not simulcast on the translator all of the time. 10AM-3PM the AM would be local while 107.5 would have ESPN national hosts. Play by play conflicts would be settled by splitting up the simulcast also. Wouldn't this approach be considered originating programming on a translator and not within translator rules?