• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

The Trump Administration rants about ABC News And NBC, Says They Should Lose FCC Licenses

He will threaten every chance he gets. But he can't actually DO anything. That's what matters, and why we all need to put Chairman Carr on ignore.
Extortion is a thing. And by threatening to use the power of the federal government to make life difficult for license holders, he is quite literally doing something. Threats are actions themselves. And even if one wants to believe, against a preponderance of evidence, that SCOTUS will smack him down, the expense it takes to get to that point can drown a business. You know this. The threats matter.
 
He wonders why nobody likes him or reports what he wants. He just keeps on attacking reporters. It's not how to win friends or influence people:


Attacking reporters isn't going to change the fact that this is an unpopular war.
 
He wonders why nobody likes him or reports what he wants.
He doesn’t wonder. He weaves his own reality that for decades has been supported by an inner circle of sycophants who know how to manipulate him to obtain what they want.

To wonder and to have the self awareness people loathe you requires a level of self-awareness and modicum of intellect, neither of which he possesses.
He just keeps on attacking reporters. It's not how to win friends or influence people:


Attacking reporters isn't going to change the fact that this is an unpopular war.
The corollary should be that buttering them up does not produce fair or accurate reporting. It promotes becoming a propaganda arm of the administration.

But yet again, we are trying to apply normal motivations, behaviors and knowledge to a mentally unstable, sundowning sociopath.
 
p.s. and right on cue, there's a Truth Social post:

It's treason for saying bad things about the war

According to Merriam-Webster.com, the definition of treason is "the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family."

Sorry, Mr. President, but "saying bad things about the war" hardly qualifies. But then, you are an idiot so I don't expect you to understand that.
 

Here is a rebuttal by commissioner Anna Gomez related to the FCC threat.

The lone Democratic commissioner at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) says recent threats made against broadcasters by FCC Chairman Brendan Carr are baseless because the agency has not taken enforcement action against licensed TV stations for news content.

In a statement released on Monday, FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez encouraged reporters to “stop falling for the FCC’s intimidation tactics” following widespread news coverage of Carr’s social media posts, during which he threatened the broadcast licenses of radio and TV stations over unfavorable coverage of President Donald Trump’s ongoing military campaign against Iran.

The comments were prompted by a social media post from Trump that complained about newspaper coverage of a bombing campaign from Iran against a U.S. Air Force base in Saudi Arabia, during which five refueling aircraft were either destroyed or heavily damaged.


Carr reminded broadcast stations that they have a “public interest” obligation associated with their FCC-issued licenses, and threatened to cancel the licenses upon renewal if the outlets air news coverage that the administration deems unfavorable.
 

He’s not acting as an independent regulator operating in the public interest. He’s functioning as a mouthpiece — a more than willing and eager one — for the President of the United States. That might be acceptable if it came paired with meaningful regulatory work. It doesn’t. Instead, Carr’s chairmanship has been defined by headline-chasing and culture war theatrics. His bully-pulpit strategy has been evident for more than a year, as he’s railed against alleged media bias and welcomed disputes with the likes of ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel.

Then again, what do you expect from a government run by media stars? None of them want to do their jobs. They'd rather be entertainers.
 



Then again, what do you expect from a government run by media stars? None of them want to do their jobs. They'd rather be entertainers.
Some for sure. Others are “true believers.” The quieter ones who are committed to the white supremacist, Christian nationalist movement are insidious. The media is letting them fly under the radar by focusing on the shiny objects as designed.
 
The media is letting them fly under the radar by focusing on the shiny objects as designed.

If "the media" is "letting them fly under the radar," then why is the president demanding their licenses be revoked????

If "the media" is doing what he wants, then why is he angry at them? He's suing the Wall Street Journal!

"The media" is not one thing. They don't act as a group. But the president and the FCC want to shut them all down. That's where the problem is.

There is so much lawlessness, greed, corruption and crime in this administration, it's literally impossible to keep up with all of it.
 
If "the media" is "letting them fly under the radar," then why is the president demanding their licenses be revoked????

If "the media" is doing what he wants, then why is he angry at them?
Because an irrational, narcissistic, sundowning imbecile?

The need to defend the press is comical at this point. Not every member of the administration is being trotted out (or choosing to trot themselves out) for appearance after appearance to sing dear leader’s praises. The ones who still wield substantial power but lurk more in the shadows are not getting attention commensurate with their danger. But no doubt we can be lectured about how the press is beyond criticism as an institution in 5…4…3…2…1…
He's suing the Wall Street Journal!
And?
"The media" is not one thing.
Ah there we are. Right on time.
They don't act as a group.
They sure as hell act alike by and large. That’s the point.
But the president and the FCC want to shut them all down. That's where the problem is.
Pssssssst….there is more than one problem. We have a multitude of interconnected and entangled problems that interact with each other.
There is so much lawlessness, greed, corruption and crime in this administration,
Agreed completely.
it's literally impossible to keep up with all of it.
Making a meaningful, sustained attempt would be a good start.
 
Because an irrational, narcissistic, sundowning imbecile?

When you lump "the media" into one group, and blame them instead of the real problem, you're helping him, because you're both blaming the media.

The need to defend the press is comical at this point.

It's extremely important. Every battle is important. As I've said, their power comes from the people. When the people object to having PBS or Jimmy Kimmel taken away from them, the people are doing what the media can't do.

They sure as hell act alike by and large. That’s the point.

No they don't. You're lying. There's a huge gap between Breitbart and MS Now. You treat them as one group, just like the president.

This president exists by dividing people. When the people unite against a common enemy, they win. When they fight amongst themselves over purity tests as you're doing, they lose.
 
That's true but when a cabinet member resigns over how the war in Iran is handled.

If you are going to comment on government, please have at least a rudimentary knowledge of civics.

Unless someone has "Secretary of ..." at the beginning of their title, they are not a cabinet member.
 
When you lump "the media" into one group, and blame them instead of the real problem, you're helping him, because you're both blaming the media.
We already covered this. We’re not going to post a table of every little org to appease your obsessive, reflexive defense of any criticism of media outlets. You already know we speak in broad generalities on large topics, as normal people do. Would saying it refers to the major broadcasters and cable outlets pacify this need?
It's extremely important. Every battle is important.
I’m glad you find satisfaction in the role of media defender. That must be extremely comforting.

As I've said, their power comes from the people. When the people object to having PBS or Jimmy Kimmel taken away from them, the people are doing what the media can't do.
Won’t do. What the media won’t do.
No they don't.
Yeah, it’s a figment of our imagination that the top two network newscasts are nearly interchangeable every day save for the person doing the reading. The third was interchangeable, but is moving from just ignoring the danger to gaslighting us into saying it’s a good thing.
You're lying.
Sorry if the facts hurt. 🤷

There's a huge gap between Breitbart and MS Now. You treat them as one group, just like the president.
Which listing of alphabet soup initials will soothe the tortured soul of someone who takes such great pride in defending media?
This president exists by dividing people.
He exists by being a sociopath propped up by people who can manipulate him into doing what they desire.

When the people unite against a common enemy, they win. When they fight amongst themselves over purity tests as you're doing, they lose.
There can be more than one enemy.

No idea where you’re conjuring up this “purity test” silliness. A bare minimal expectation of the mainstream media to not cave to the regime over and over and over is hardly a purity test. Though perhaps when one is hardwired to see no harm in anything those outlets do, those things can look alike.
 
If you are going to comment on government, please have at least a rudimentary knowledge of civics.

Unless someone has "Secretary of ..." at the beginning of their title, they are not a cabinet member.


True it’s a former director of US National CounterTerrorism center in this update. All true here one wonders what happens when unfavorable reporting on Iran is coming from the inside how does the White House and the FCC reacts after they ranted about going after media outlets through license threats over this very issue.


The U.S. counterterrorism official who resigned Tuesday had been a staunch supporter of President Donald Trump through his 2020 election defeat, the Jan. 6 riots and years of conservative media advocacy and failed congressional bids.
But Trump’s war in Iran and his alliance with Israel against the Islamic clerics who led the Tehran government were too much for Joe Kent.
Resigning as director of the U.S. National Counterterrorism Center, Kent said Iran “posed no imminent threat to our nation,” and he asserted that “we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.”
A 45-year-old special forces combat veteran with ties to right-wing extremists, Kent was considered as much of a loyalist as Trump could have in the government’s top counterterrorism post.
 


Back
Top Bottom