michael hagerty said:
Radio genre terms for formats and street terminology should match as closely as possible. It allows the station to say "We are (blank)" and have the audience say "Yeah, that's exactly right."
If you asked random people on the street what constitutes the Oldies era what do you think they would say? I'm thinking they would probably point to KOOL and say "those are oldies". Ten years from now, when KOOL has moved their playlist forward to 1980-2010, they will not be saying that. My oldest is 38 but neither he nor his younger siblings refer to their teen music as "oldies". Oldies are MY youth music. That's my point.
michael hagerty said:
Webster's dictionary says the use of the term "oldie" dates back to 1874, and simply means a song from an earlier day. Every generation has their oldies. Mine (Baby Boomers) got played to the exclusion of everyone else's for far too long. We don't need to bury the term with us.
The difference between street term oldie and music genre oldie is what I was trying to get across earlier. Yes, a generic oldie is anything old but that term is useless to describe radio music playlists. Frank Sinatra is an oldie but he is not in the genre Oldie.
michael hagerty said:
It's been 8 years since the format changed names. More like a decade since stations stopped using it as an identifier.
Not true. Many, many stations still refer to themselves as Oldies (even those that play songs outside the parameters). Oldies didn't change to anything, rather, some stations changed their genre name to Classic Hits so they could incorporate newer music into their playlists and not appear to be an old codger. Personally I think the CH designation is worthless and describes nothing but it is a name that has been accepted - apparently as a convenience to advertisers and their agencies. "Classic Hits" could as easily describe The Andrews Sisters or Dean Martin as it could Led Zeppelin or The Moody Blues.
michael hagerty said:
If today's audience wants to call "She Bop" or "Smooth" an oldie, not only are they right, but it's a golden opportunity for radio to ditch the clunky terminology of "Classic Hits" and get in sync with their listeners.
Those of us who use the term Oldies know what it means. My kids wouldn't be caught dead saying it to each other because it is music from a generation that proceeded them and they don't consider themselves old fogeys quite yet. For that reason you won't hear them call either of your examples Oldies.
I'm not sure I understand what's "clunky" about the term Classic Hits and how it relates to the continued widening of the genre Oldies. If I asked a musical-informed person to give me an example of a classic hit they might say Beethoven's Fifth Symphony, "Boogie Woogie Bugle Boy", "Volare" or "Yesterday". Every one of those was a classic hit but only two fit the radio definition.
michael hagerty said:
The 1955-1980 music? That's oldies too. But the majority of it has simply aged out of usefulness for airplay.
Now we're branching out into another type of discussion. The music known as Standards/Nostalgia/MOYL etc., has also aged out of economic usefulness to commercial radio but those labels are not being altered to make them into something they are/were not. The same should apply to Oldies. It was a period in time for a certain type of music. Calling something out of the decade of the 90's an oldie simply because it is 15 years old is incorrect.