I'm still struggling with any direct ties between a livable city, according to various opinions, economic conditions, whatever, to the quality of radio stations or formats. It's like comparing apples to microphones. Detroit has struggled economically since the 2008 Depression, yet have been home of quality and groundbreaking radio formats. Chicago is another example. San Francisco, Los Angeles, and NYC come to mind too. All great radio cities, in spite of their 'livability index' or whatever metric you want to politically paint the market with.
Detroit's got 5 Contemporary (or some variant) stations in the top 10, all owned by either iHeart or Beasley. Variety much? Nah. And again, WNIC's numbers are inflated by the holidays. Otherwise, I do see a lot of good options here, including Funk, except the only way to get Detroit's 4 Funk stations, you have to own an HD radio. Why are there so many Smile FM translators around?
As for Chi-town, NYC, and SF, a good chunk of the discussion boards on here seems to be complaints about something, or how long will *insert station here* last? Chicago though, is a very saturated market, and that's good for them. If you ask a New Yorker the last time they enjoyed radio though, they'll tell you the 1960's, probably.
Again, are you giving Portland that grade because of radio station performance in the market, or because you politically have a problem with that city? I can see lumping-in political talk radio with political opinions, but to paint an entire city with poor radio because of personal political leanings? Misguided and unfair.
And yet you claim that because you don't like the culture, radio in the market suffers too? Which is it?
You have a testimonial from
@oldradiotapes, whom I suspect is left-wing, and even ORT does not feel comfortable in Portland.
Without sounding like a skipping CD, you're using 6+ information which is useless. Doesn't account for station target demographics, nor revenue.
Good point, and at the same time, Nielsen's ratings are like a sample, but it's not precise. However, it paints a picture that can correlate to revenue most of the time.
And so far, you've made some doozy's.
🤣 Nuts! It's way too easy to make these blanket statements! Which is why coordinated research is important, and I tried to include as much as I could for this one.
---
Anyways, this does not seem to be going anywhere productive. Just saying, ORT does not like Portland's options, maybe that's just a coincidence?