Onesimus said:bigtime said:PPM seems to be very good to "at-work" type stations and not so good to urbans. Stations like WIBC are not often listened to for any length of time in drive times when they focus on news. They're great when there is breaking news but otherwise once you've heard the news you don't need to hear it again any time soon. And when it's sunny and dry for weeks at a time who really wants to hear the same forecast every 10 minutes. I'm sure they're hoping for some big storms.
I understand your point, but respectfully diasgree. Fans who love Rush, Hannity, etc. tend to over-report their listening in the diary world. The PPM exposes the reality. There are all-news stations in New York and Chicago that kill the closest talk competitor. You're right that radio is great for breaking news. No other form of media can compete (WHEN stations are properly staffed). A lot of stations that don't do well at news/talk simply do it poorly. Crime-scene/fatal crash stories do well on TV, but research shows they're depressing on radio. There's a lot of bad writing in radio newsrooms with very little production value.
The News stations are going up and the Talk stations are going down, in part, because the PPM model is built on exposures. This heavily devalues TSL. Arbitron claims that virtually all "listening experiences" are between nine and 13 minutes and that window is immovable. It's no longer about pulling them through the break to the next quarter-hour; it's about getting them to come back after the break -- a new reality that advertisers must love.
Succinctly, we're now only interested in attracting listeners -- no one gives a s%^t if we keep them.