• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Music

You gotta inhale air once in a while, professor. I keep falling apart reading your posts:

DavidEduardo said:
The annual reports published by CBS showed profits from the time it was NYSE (New York Sock Exchange, where the principal equity issues were traded at the time) listed.

I can see the sock exchange now: "Here, Boswell, I have an argyle sock that I will trade you for two spats and a tube sock to be named later."
 
Ho Hum Davey
"In your citation of Columbia and Harvard, you forget that their collections include the writings of some rather famous scoundrels, charlatans and crooks. "
Oh now the Universities are wrong! They will have anything in their collection and YOU Don't??!! David you missed your calling as a writer of comedy-fiction.


'DIGESTS" back then, IF YOU knew your history of peridocials from the days of Pulitzer,EMBELLISHED..meaning exagerated claims in order to SELL their wares. I know about stock reports I also know about the political climates back then, NEWSPAPERS HATED RADIO! NEWSPAPERS HAD SEVERAL OTHER PUBLICATIONS which distorted FACTS something you refuse to concede in your shaded world.

Events leading UP to 1929 and soon after until 1933 of STOCK REPORTS were misleading and greater regulatory control was implemented..THE SEC Securities and Exchange Commission WHO HAD FAR GREATER POWERS THAN THEY DO NOW to keep such false information out and duping investors.( MORE THINGS CHANGE THE MORE THEY REMAIN THE SAME)
The "digest" in your "personal collection" was by todays standards "Pulp Fiction".
In your comment about "Scoundrels,Charlatans and crooks" So were the so called Financial reporters PAID on the side by corps back then. Companies had them and half the time THE BOSS had no idea because he delegated responsibilities! After 1933 that all started to change for the better and in the 1980's it started to revert back..Hello MCI and Enron!
So rather than blame a presitigous University like Columbia,start questioning your own collection of Aesop's fables. You'd make a great politician disputing factual information and never conceding.




Speaking of Columbia,( which I am sure you have in your many"McBragg" adventures) why don't you reside in Bogota,and run some stations there. I am sure you will fit right in.

If "Fantasy Island" ever comes up to be made into a movie,Please consider auditioning for Mr. Roarke. You are amusing and I am not the only one as we can see being amused. End of transmission.

CLICK ! WHIRL! FWWT! ALERT! ALERT! RESPONSE BY INTRUDER TO EDUARDO POST.SEEK IMMEDIATE EMERGENCY RESPONSE .LOAD UP DENIAL VOLLEY,SECOND UNIT, CONSULT ROGET'S THESAURAUS TO FABRICATE RESPONSE! FULLY CHARGE ARROGANCE PROPULSION.

FIRE!!!!
 
Yeah, those university studies are just like the FCC Reports to Congress. Since they contradict The World According To Davey, they must be biased.

Do you have any hot sock tips for him?

Like, "tube socks went out in the '70s?"
 
zumahans said:
Yeah, those university studies are just like the FCC Reports to Congress. Since they contradict The World According To Davey, they must be biased.

If you would read a thread before you commented on it, you would not look so foolish.

The other poster, Klif, was refering to journals and notes of Mr. Paley, not some study. He was referring to the collections of such writings by the "always truthful and honest" Mr. Paley that live at Columbia and Harvard.

You fell into a deep pit here. There are no "university studies" in question. There are only the personal writings of Paley.
 
Incorrect senor "always right and the reality is wrong'.
Columbia did do some studies(THE UNIVERSITY NOT THE COUNTRY) You have heard of the 'COLUMBIA du PONT Journalism " award haven't ya? Guess how it got its Prestige?? The "honorable and truthful Mr. Eduardo" is once again led astray by his own compulsion to argue against facts he doesn't agree with or he wasn't the first to say it.Man I better tell some friends to get rid of their shares of Univision before it becomes "LUNAvision". The leadership of Mr. Eduardo is going down faster than a toy balloon with a 5oo pound weight attached.
 
klifhanger said:
Incorrect senor "always right and the reality is wrong'.
Columbia did do some studies(THE UNIVERSITY NOT THE COUNTRY)

The country is not even SPELLED the same.

You have heard of the 'COLUMBIA du PONT Journalism " award haven't ya?

That has nothing to do with the Paley papers. The papers are simply an archive.

Guess how it got its Prestige?? The "honorable and truthful Mr. Eduardo" is once again led astray by his own compulsion to argue against facts he doesn't agree with or he wasn't the first to say it.Man I better tell some friends to get rid of their shares of Univision before it becomes "LUNAvision".

We are already announced as going private. You could not hold shares if you wanted to.

The leadership of Mr. Eduardo is going down faster than a toy balloon with a 5oo pound weight attached.

You just changed the subject from the papers of Paley to the Columbia jorunalism awards. One has nothing to do with the other.

Have you read "IN ALL HIS GLORY The Life of William S. Paley: The Legendary Tycoon and His Brilliant Circle" by Sally Bedell Smith? It is pretty much the difinitve bio of Paley.

Among the interesting items....

"In his largely fictional 1979 memoir, "As It Happened," Mr. Paley would claim that it had all been his idea, right down to the detail that it was his father and uncle who had been on vacation in Europe. Ms. Smith refers to Mr. Paley's official version of his life's events throughout her book. After a while you can tell that she is about to refer to it whenever you come across "despite" or "contrary to." For Mr. Paley it was never enough to succeed; someone else must not have been there. A shame, unnecessary, for as Ms. Smith quotes a relative of one of his credit-grabbing victims, "If Bill Paley told the truth he would be a bigger man."

See? There is considerable evidence Mr. Paley exaggerated or changed details of his life. In fact, his own memoires are full of things that just were not so but that Mr Paley chose to view "differently."

The author of the biography said, in an interview, that William S. Paley was one of television's greatest figures, but his biographer says his involvement in the medium came very much against his better judgment.

"It was surprising to me, the degree of mistrust he had for television," Sally Bedell Smith said in a telephone interview from her New York City home. "His inclination was to hold it back as long as possible. He saw it as an enormous financial drain on CBS Radio, and he was essentially a radio man."

That revelation was one of many for Ms. Smith during the five years she spent researching and writing "In All His Glory," her account of the nine decades of Mr. Paley's life and his leadership of CBS.

"He's much more of a self-creation than I had figured," said Ms. Smith. "He seemed to glide effortlessly in his role at CBS and in his role as a bon vivant, but I saw a great deal of anxiety as well as calculation and shrewdness in the way he constructed his image. He was surprisingly insecure."

To get to the core of what she calls "a figure of mystery, for all his public profile," Ms. Smith, a former reporter for The New York Times and other publications, interviewed nearly 300 people, most of them repeatedly. One of Mr. Paley's oldest acquaintances, Irene Selznick, made Ms. Smith wait two years, telling the biographer, "You come to me with the contradictions."

Contradictions is the keyword. It surprises me not a bit that Mr Paleys writings disagree with his own company's public financial statements. The man adjusted the truth to fit his needs.
 
Klif,

ENOUGH ALREADY!

David's identity is known, whereas most of us see you for what you are, a childish troll hiding behind an alias. Even if you did prove David was wrong about something, why should we believe it? You’re just an anonymous boy with an axe to grind against a professional. Can you spell "jealous"?

Go find another tree to bark up.

R
 
Robert Bass said:
Klif,

ENOUGH ALREADY!

David's identity is known, whereas most of us see you for what you are, a childish troll hiding behind an alias. Even if you did prove David was wrong about something, why should we believe it? You’re just an anonymous boy with an axe to grind against a professional. Can you spell "jealous"?

Go find another tree to bark up.

R

Thank you, Robert, for over the years being a voice of reason on this board. The participants do not have to agree (it would be little fun if we did), but we can get along.

There is a fascinating possibility here, should anyone care to pursue it. I got a bunch of CBS and Paley related books from the library, and kind of speed-read them (that means I skimmed). Paley, when writing about Paley, does not say the same things others say about Paley. The author of the "best" biography of the man focuses on many of these inconsistencies, all of which make him seem brighter and more prescient!

So, I discovered an interesting sidebar to the CBS story. We all have read of some of the things that Sarnoff and RCA did that parobably would not pass DoJ muster today, perticularly related to Major Armstrong and his patents and to the competing color TV systems... but I did not know there was a less than savory side to Paley, too. I can't say my world is shattered, but it does paint the Tiffany Network in new light.

And I did some fun and informative reading to boot. The "good old days" weren't.
 
Robert I respect you. You have done well with Keom.

David on the other hand has placed his "own insults" directed towards his critics. I among them. So If your going to say "enough" Direct it to both parties He has committed the same style of commentary,just worded differently.

As for David. Your "upper hand" comment to Robert is so typical of you,"whitewashing" your own syntax. The "I did nuttin wrong" has trouble spreading wings and flying.

Your quote:
"Ms. Smith quotes a relative of one of his credit-grabbing victims, "If Bill Paley told the truth he would be a bigger man."

See? There is considerable evidence Mr. Paley exaggerated or changed details of his life. In fact, his own memoires are full of things that just were not so but that Mr Paley chose to view "differently."

Credible? One person's opinion based on a third person source?

Are you a consultant to FOX as well?

Of course your opinion mixed with the opinon of a third person's recollection(Most likely embellished) only wanders away from fact,not the truth as you vainly have tried to convince not just me but yourself. You don't recognize satire when it is plain to see in regards to other posts,such as the "LUNAvision" comment"
Just like you don't recognize a fact that proves you wrong in your opinion.
You took Paley's Biography" out of context and spun it to your thinking. Something FOX does well. In summary you place yourself above others, brag upon yourself endlessly,and have a phobia about not being wrong ,even with simple subjects as this post started out as . Its called Obsession. The truth lies not within yourself,and the facts of the matter are non existent within you as well. You wax poetic but poetry reflects fantasy. In conclusion,it was enjoyable, but I will cease my participation in this thread out of respect to Robert Bass. I advise that you do the same. You amused me.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom