well I take back what I said. The Mavericks still do have a relationship with iheart media. One of them is employed by the team. It’s not ideal. But, it’s actually smart, business wise to keep themBEN AND SKIN ARE STAYING - AFTERNOONS.
well I take back what I said. The Mavericks still do have a relationship with iheart media. One of them is employed by the team. It’s not ideal. But, it’s actually smart, business wise to keep themBEN AND SKIN ARE STAYING - AFTERNOONS.
This has been mentioned in other posts, but to clarify and summarizeIs Foo Fighters being played on rural radio right now? I’m trying to confirm because I see two web apps. I’m trying to confirm which one is actually the actual station since I’m listening on iHeart leaving work
Not really. I’ve worked for a mainstream rocker - focused mostly on classics, but included a handful of currents.Isn't it a bit too "hard" for mainstream rock though? And if it has virtually no "currents" isn't it classic?
The Mavs playoff game tomorrow night will be on Lonestar 92.5
It’s best to describe KEGL as mainstream, not active, rock.
This is what got The Eagle in trouble in the first placeYep, and then it moves back over to Eagle. You can trust me, I'm not just making this up.
Yeah but iheart does still have a relationship with the Mavs they can’t afford to screw up or lose. So having Ben and Skin isn’t ideal for either side. One of them works for the mavs. Plus im sure they bring their own money to the table with rollertown ads. But, it has to be done to satisfy the contract - however I think B&S need to be away from any drive time day parts. Keep them from 10-1This is what got The Eagle in trouble in the first place
Musically the Eagle needs to resemble Turbo on Sirius.
I can’t agree more! I was thinking the same exact thing!!!Musically the Eagle needs to resemble Turbo on Sirius.
What kind of numbers does Turbo get? Sirius isn't in the OTA radio business for a reason.
If you haven't heard it or if you don't know the rock format, then why would you ask that question.
I think you’re missing the point. Half of the music that The Eagle is playing is being played elsewhere. I believe all Kramer is trying to say is that The Eagle would have a better chance of being successful and making money if they would drop a lot of the older stuff that they’re playing. And I totally agree.Because I'm trying to understand how a channel on a subscription service would help a radio station make money. Would the fans of that music pay for it? Or would they be willing to sit through 14 minute commercial breaks advertising products they don't use.
If people can hear that music without commercials, why would they want it with commercials? Do you understand my question now?
My old roommate would often stumble across a movie on cable and watch it with commercials when the commercial free version was readily available on streaming services or DVD/Blu Ray. I’m sure she’s not alone in this and I’m sure it also happens with radio too.If people can hear that music without commercials, why would they want it with commercials? Do you understand my question now?
I think you’re missing the point. Half of the music that The Eagle is playing is being played elsewhere.
Okay, let’s put it this way. You go into a pub and in addition to the popular beer, they also sell smoothies, sno cones, coffee and freshly squeezed fruit juices. That’s what The Eagle is right now with the music they’re playing.There's a reason why they're played elsewhere: They're hits.
Every pub I go to sells basically the same food. A lot of them have the same beer on tap. Ever wonder why?
Would they make more money if they sold food that was only available at one place? Depends on the food.