• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

Univision Secret Police would probably have a hard time getting their car started.

I -know- Chesperito is a guy, a guy who does comedy skits in drag a lot. Thus the joke, which you don't get.

And who ever said you had to move back to Mexico? Why do you make such a vile, scurrilous accusation?

I never, ever would tell you to go anywhere. I said if I ever move back to Mexico, which I may do some day, I love it there.

You accusation is a libel. You put scurrilous words in my mouth simply because I caught you lying.

It is amazing that you could be so ignorant of popular culture in both Mexico and the land of Unitedstatesistas.

Now go Google "cletus" and come back with your usual ration of rationalizations.
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

zumahans said:
I -know- Chesperito is a guy, a guy who does comedy skits in drag a lot. Thus the joke, which you don't get.

And who ever said you had to move back to Mexico? Why do you make such a vile, scurrilous accusation?

Chespirito, the professional name for Gómez Boalños, did, principally, El Chavo del Ocho (a boy who lived in a barrel), El Chapulín Colorado (a parody of Superman and on whom the Bumblebee Man in the Simpsons is based). Those were the two main shows. The later, and shorter lived Chespirito show had Gómez Bolaños in male roles, also. If he has done bits in drag, I have missed them.

You yourself suggested that I might move "back" to Mexico. Since I am not form there, I can not go back. Nice try.
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

DavidEduardo said:
You yourself suggested that I might move "back" to Mexico.

Where?

Where was this comment made, please?

Nowhere in this thread have I ever said that. No where in my life have I ever said that.

I said I may move back to Mexico some day, I love it there. Is that what has you all flumoxed?

Did you look up Cletus yet?
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

zumahans said:
DavidEduardo said:
You yourself suggested that I might move "back" to Mexico.

Where?

Where was this comment made, please?

My mistake. You made a rather convoluted statement about moving back to Mexico. I failed to see it was about you, not me. My bad.

Now, your turn to rectify the Chespirito thing.
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

DavidEduardo said:
My mistake. You made a rather convoluted statement about moving back to Mexico. I failed to see it was about you, not me. My bad.
"If I ever move back to Mexico permanently (oh, yes, Dave, I spent a wonderful year there as a boy), I assure you I will watch Chespirito reruns until her skirt finally falls off."

Yeah, I can see how that convoluted sentence confused you, and forced you to twice place reprehensible, repugnant comments in my mouth. Paging Dr. Freud, the inner Dave wants so bad for me to be like that!

And you equate those horrible words with my perceived error on Chesperito reruns? Verdad?

As to Chesperito, he has on several occasions donned woman's clothing with hee-larious results.

It's funny thjat you say watching the Simpsons is a waste of your precious time, yet you know the Bumblebee Man from Canal Ocho on the Simpsons. Even Cletus wouldn't buy that.

Or did you get that info from Sancho's Restaurant web site, too?
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

I have two stacks of Radio-Info Christmas party invitations.
There will be two separate parties this year.

One party's stack of invites has--among others--zumahansnews94
as an invitee.

The other party's stack includes a card going to DavidEduardo.

For obvious reasons.

Although I'm really tempted to mix both names in the same
party stack and let them duke it out in person. ;D

BTW, did we ever get a consensus on the legal ID?
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

oldiesfan6479 said:
I have two stacks of Radio-Info Christmas party invitations.
There will be two separate parties this year.

One party's stack of invites has--among others--zumahansnews94
as an invitee.

The other party's stack includes a card going to DavidEduardo.

For obvious reasons.

Although I'm really tempted to mix both names in the same
party stack and let them duke it out in person. ;D

BTW, did we ever get a consensus on the legal ID?

Si, kah zeta el ah, Nuestro Pueblo de Los Angeles de Porniculia, Alta California. A service of Emmis Communications, serving nuestro pueblo since last week."
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

is this a conversation about radio i.d.s or racism between 2, mostly ONLY 2 people that are way off topic and should have taken the conversation ELSEWHERE - many, many, many posts ago?

you guys are just taking up bandwidth and other people's time with your verbal jousting. one of you has a bigger one. fine. either one of you drive a corvette? a big, red, loud one? you both seem to be overcompensating for something. i don't know what that is, but my guess is BREVITY, or common sense enough to EMAIL EACH OTHER with this stuff. this nitpicking B.S. has to stop. you might call it "discussion" - but this ain't the place for it. GIVE IT UP ALREADY. maybe neither one of you are correct. maybe both of you are correct. WHO CARES - outside of you two?

and zuma - before you say to ignore the posts, we have to wade through them to see if there IS anything that remotely pertains to the original topic. not any of the other reasons you've stated for continuing this - for the lack of a better term - conversation. now there are...what, 12 pages of you & david taking whacks at each other with encyclopedias, dictionaries from different languages, name-calling, and whatever other crap you can fling at each other. from the outside, just an opinion, it makes you both look ridiculous.

if david and zuma can rant, and WAY OFF TOPIC, i can too i guess.

oldiesfan6479 said:
...Although I'm really tempted to mix both names in the same
party stack and let them duke it out in person. ;D

BTW, did we ever get a consensus on the legal ID?

i'd pay $1 to see the fight, btw. with or without boxing gloves.
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

This thread is the only life in this forum, and I am saying things that many others have wanted to say to Dave for many years, only to be cut off by overprotective moderators.

Bandwidth is free, and the majority of the comments are positive. Last I checked, this thread and its companion have more visits than all the other current threads in this forum combined.

If you cannot stomach that, then I remind you that life is tough, and then you die.

I know there is a huge audience out there just dying to know if Movin is doing legal IDs, and to those thousands of people, I am so, so terribly sorry to have bothered you with a discussion that actually makes you think.

In all seriousness, thank you for your patience in this. A lot of things have needed to be said to Dave for a very long time.
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

DavidEduardo said:
I did not know that "Cletus" was used in a special way (demeanin?) there.



'Cletus' isn't exactly a name that one would choose at random. You had mean intentions when using that name.

After all the other BS, I just dont believe that you didn't know. Now you are more then a biggot and a racist, now you are liar.

Univision has hired a world class POS to be their VP.
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

Noiseboxxx said:
WHO CARES - outside of you two?









Just because people choose not to post doesnt mean people arent interested. Quite a few people have read this thread. Somebody want to print up hard copies of this and the other thread where he says white KFI listeners are polorized bigots? That way if somebody cuts into Mr.Eduardo one day and calls him a racist, they will have documentation to support it.

Somebody should let the heads at Univision what an ass they have working for them.
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

hamNcheese said:
Just because people choose not to post doesnt mean people arent interested. Quite a few people have read this thread. Somebody want to print up hard copies of this and the other thread where he says white KFI listeners are polorized bigots? That way if somebody cuts into Mr.Eduardo one day and calls him a racist, they will have documentation to support it.

Somebody should let the heads at Univision what an ass they have working for them.

Ahh, shucks, Dave may be an overblown, self-aggrandizing transparent apologist for corporate radio who belittles and viciously places horrible, false quotes into the mouths of people who disagree with him, but deep down he's a good guy.

I mean, who else but a real mensch would back up his argument with a citation from the Senor Sancho's Restaurant webpage, and then disagree with an FCC report to Congress on the radio industry?

Ya gotta love THAT.
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

Ahh, shucks, Dave may be an overblown, self-aggrandizing transparent apologist for corporate radio who belittles and viciously places horrible, false quotes into the mouths of people who disagree with him, but deep down he's a good guy.

Sarcasm is a literary device you should stay away from unless you can be a bit more subtle.

I
mean, who else but a real mensch would back up his argument with a citation from the Senor Sancho's Restaurant webpage, and then disagree with an FCC report to Congress on the radio industry?

There you go agian, distorting the statements. I simply posted a half dozen example of non-derogatory usage of "gringo" to show that among gringos themselves and buisnesses catering to gringos, the ter, when not used derisively, was not negative at all! The restaurant was but one example of how the term is used commonly, cutely and with no intended offense.

The FCC report is quesitonable if not patently deceptive. Any report that talks about the impact of interest payments on EBITDA is seriously whacked... as anyone who cares to learn can see, since EBITDA excludes interest payments!

If you believe everything the goevernment says and does, wonderful. I don't. One of the reasons the system of government of the US has checks and balances is to prevent the egregious spread of government abuse and theover-empowerment of certain agencies of the government. In this case, someone at the FCC has an agenda against consolidation and has "cookied the books" in this release that uses a strange term ("capital") as a basis for ratios and which shows a total lack of understanding of EBITDA:
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

----> Sarcasm is a literary device you should stay away from unless you can be a bit more subtle.

Thanks for the hints on proper use of drollery. Coming from someone with such a demonstrated sense of humor I will be sure to follow your example.

For example, there was your hilarious kneeslapper of insulting a person by calling him "Cletus" and then saying he had no idea what that term means in English.

Then, there's you giggle-inducing notion that you are somehow an authority on the current, common usage of language when you boast that you never watch television.

Then, there's your rolling on the floors guffaws you inducewhen you place false "Go back to Mexico" statements in others mouths, or call them "Ugly Americans", and then play the "can't we all get along, you other cultures?" card.

Oh, here's my favorite Humor Lesson From Dave: Blast other people for backing up their arguments with Wikipedia, and then support your argument with a citation to Senor Sanchez's Restaurant's web site.

"For all those lexicographers who need that one last citation to get their Ph.D., be sure to check out www.senorsanchez.com, your 24/7 source for last word on offensive jargon, and a damn mean menudo weekends!"


---->If you believe everything the goevernment says and does, wonderful. I don't.

Nope, but I trust a governmental report to Congress, reinforced by dozens of industry sources, more than I trust you: a proven twister of facts, a demonstrated misapplier of statistics, and a man who cannot face his own errors.

Gotcha, Dave, splayed out here on the web for all to see.

The Great and Mighty David Eduardo is wearing no pants.
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

DavidEduardo said:
someone at the FCC has an agenda against consolidation and has "cookied the books" in this release that uses a strange term ("capital") as a basis for ratios and which shows a total lack of understanding of EBITDA:

Is this another one for Dave's World of Humor?

I don't know which is funnier, that you think the current FCC has an agenda against consolidation, or that someone there has "cookied" the books!

Make mine a snickerdoodle, please.
 
WAS: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

I split the posts that were irrelevant to the original question.


Managing Board Editor
 
Re: WAS: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

Managing Board Editor said:
I split the posts that were irrelevant to the original question.


Managing Board Editor

Nicely played.

Thank you for your indulgence.
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

DavidEduardo said:
Chespirito, the professional name for Gómez Boalños, did, principally, El Chavo del Ocho (a boy who lived in a barrel), El Chapulín Colorado (a parody of Superman and on whom the Bumblebee Man in the Simpsons is based). Those were the two main shows. The later, and shorter lived Chespirito show had Gómez Bolaños in male roles, also. If he has done bits in drag, I have missed them.

Man, you really need to watch the Simpsons.
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

zumahans said:
DavidEduardo said:
someone at the FCC has an agenda against consolidation and has "cookied the books" in this release that uses a strange term ("capital") as a basis for ratios and which shows a total lack of understanding of EBITDA:

Is this another one for Dave's World of Humor?

I don't know which is funnier, that you think the current FCC has an agenda against consolidation, or that someone there has "cookied" the books!

There are two commissioners with a very definite agenda against consolidation, and only tepid support for the Powell era agenda of "enhancing" consolidation.

Sidebar; this is unfortunate. Letting newspapers buy radio and TV properties again might benefit both the decline of the print medium as well as give access to large news staffs to the broadcast media.

In any case, the actual financial of the publicly traded radio companies do not support the contentions of the FCC press release. "We are from the government and we are here to help you..."
 
Re: Movin Not Airing Legal I.D.

DavidEduardo said:
zumahans said:
DavidEduardo said:
someone at the FCC has an agenda against consolidation and has "cookied the books" in this release that uses a strange term ("capital") as a basis for ratios and which shows a total lack of understanding of EBITDA:

Is this another one for Dave's World of Humor?

I don't know which is funnier, that you think the current FCC has an agenda against consolidation, or that someone there has "cookied" the books!

There are two commissioners with a very definite agenda against consolidation, and only tepid support for the Powell era agenda of "enhancing" consolidation.

Sidebar; this is unfortunate. Letting newspapers buy radio and TV properties again might benefit both the decline of the print medium as well as give access to large news staffs to the broadcast media.

In any case, the actual financial of the publicly traded radio companies do not support the contentions of the FCC press release. "We are from the government and we are here to help you..."

It wasn't a press release, it was an FCC Report to Congress. Which makes it a damn site more believable than what you found at Senor Sanchez's Restaurant website, or your secret, properiatary ratings data that you always run crying to.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom