CC's in somewhat of a bind with what to do with KVET. From one standpoint, PPM was not being kind to it. The audience was older than what the advertisers want, and the diary numbers were heavily based on TSL, which PPM showed wasn't as long as the diary holders remembered. I don't, however, think anyone can look at the current numbers and say the new approach is working. It looks to be even worse, much worse!
On the other hand, if Clear Channel blows up KVET, they're exposing KASE to a new competitor. Having just KASE with a full-market country signal is almost begging Entercom or Emmis to come after them. Clear Channel is trying to provide KASE's competition without damaging it. So, if you want to argue this new approach to KVET is working, I suppose you could say it's doing exactly that. However, it seems like an expensive and very inefficient way of accomplishing that goal.