radioguy39nj said:Lkeller said:Anyway, the supposed difference now is that a much larger percentage of the audience will not listen to AM radio on a regular basis. I would assume play-by-play sports is an exception to this. If you're a 25 year old sports fan and want to hear a Giants game, you're going to tune in KNBR, even if it is on the hated AM dial. Alternatively, if you want to hear the As, you'll find 95.7.
I would think the question is - can 95.7 find regular programming that will make regular sports-talk listeners tune away from KNBR?
KNBR has not had to deal with serious competition. They've had the sports radio market in the Bay Area pretty much to themselves. You're correct, if you want to hear a Giants' game, regardless of your age, you tune in 680 AM. To hear the A's, you go to 95.7 FM.
The sports radio landscape has changed in recent years with sporting events now broadcast routinely on FM. Bear in mind the 49ers simulcast most of their games on KSAN 107.7 FM.
IMHO, the question is will the launching of 95.7 as a sports station hasten the migration or simulcast of KGO and KNBR on FM?![]()
I'm no expert, but the answer to that question seems uncertain. Again, I pose the KFI example. Clear Channel could easily simulcast KFI on one of their FMs, and though it seems inevitable, they haven't so far. The reason may be that they still believe they can make more revenue by running different formats on all of their stations than they can from a simulcast.
Cumulus will no doubt make the same calculation with KGO and KNBR. What their determination will be, we can only speculate. The KCBS simulcast is a little different. CBS only purchased 106.9 a few years ago, and made the decision to do the KCBS simulcast after the 2 formats they tried (Free FM and Classic Hits KFRC) failed to draw any substantial ratings. That one seems like a no-brainer to me.