A
airwavez
Guest
Radical348 said:.
After listening to Live 105 pretty much nonstop in the past week, the only band I'd expect them to re-add that I haven't heard yet is New Order.
They did play New Order-Bizarre Love Triangle.
Radical348 said:.
After listening to Live 105 pretty much nonstop in the past week, the only band I'd expect them to re-add that I haven't heard yet is New Order.
airwavez said:Radical348 said:.
After listening to Live 105 pretty much nonstop in the past week, the only band I'd expect them to re-add that I haven't heard yet is New Order.
They did play New Order-Bizarre Love Triangle.
JimmyJames said:I don't know that even "the masses" are any happier with the RHCP/Linkin Park every hour format either. They need to space the tracks out more though. I heard "Two Hearts Beat as One" by U2 both last night and this afternoon which is pretty close for a track of its popularity.
JimmyJames said:I don't know that even "the masses" are any happier with the RHCP/Linkin Park every hour format either. They need to space the tracks out more though. I heard "Two Hearts Beat as One" by U2 both last night and this afternoon which is pretty close for a track of its popularity.
JimmyJames said:So how long did this last? I gather Live 105 backed off the vintage vinyl stuff after only a few months, but not being in the area lately, I can't confirm.
no chance, unless sean demery comes back, now that was a great PDMike said:Guess there's no chance they'll revive "K-GAY" this year for Pride Weekend?![]()
punkdj said:when i worked at live 105, we were all shocked when the pd showed us the results from the research. everything we were tired of, and hated , was top 5... everything we loved was at the bottom. thats the sad truth.. chili ppeppers, linkin park , beastie boys, all at the top. thats what the lemmings want. thats what theyll get.
this is what i have been saying here for months... this is why jelli radio will fail, and will eventually kill live 105. (30 people on their computers programming a station to hundreds of thousands of listeners?? ) just reality...DavidKaye said:punkdj said:when i worked at live 105, we were all shocked when the pd showed us the results from the research. everything we were tired of, and hated , was top 5... everything we loved was at the bottom. thats the sad truth.. chili ppeppers, linkin park , beastie boys, all at the top. thats what the lemmings want. thats what theyll get.
WELCOME to the real world. You and I and others here are music geeks. We love music; we love crazy, inventive, melodically unique music. We crave it. We may play it professionally or we may be fans, but we often go to clubs to hear our favorites, and wouldn't flinch at driving 50 miles to hear a particularly good band or solo artist in a dive bar or at a house party.
BUT WE ARE NOT AVERAGE LISTENERS. Average listeners want to hear something familiar, maybe it's something easy on the ears or maybe it's the headbanging rock they grew up with at age 16. Whatever, THAT is the kind of stuff they want to hear. This is why true music geeks can never be satisfied with commercial radio.
Or to put it another way, mainstream music isn't art; it is the opposite of art. Art starts at the refined level and may (or may not) eventually filter down to the masses.
The great movie "Citizen Kane" was not considered great when it came out. But it withstood the test of time and eventually more and more people began to see its beauty. But sometimes this never happens. Look at the Oscar awards of any give year and you'll find that it's the pablum and the crap that is awarded time and again.
Look at the Beatles catalog. The best, most musicially sophisticated Beatles songs never made it into Billboard's top 50. The simple tunes dashed off in half an hour are the chart winners.
now that they are gonna broadcast raider games.. thats probably next..tripton99 said:I smell sports/talk with Raiders and Sharks p-b-p.
JimmyJames said:So how long did this last? I gather Live 105 backed off the vintage vinyl stuff after only a few months, but not being in the area lately, I can't confirm.
JimmyJames said:David, while I respect your point, isn't part of what made "modern rock" a successful format is that it DID target musically passionate, involved people who were seeking "something different?"