• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

White House bars AP, Reuters and other media from covering Trump cabinet meeting

Here is the other part why Hegseth is doing whatever the White House is ordering him to do that to the press. And like the White House Press Corp have done in protest the Pentagon Press Association did the same thing too.
“There is no way to sugarcoat it. Today’s memo by Secretary Hegseth appears to be a direct attack on the freedom of the press and America’s right to know what its military is doing,” it said in a statement Friday night. “The Pentagon Press Association is extremely concerned by the decision to restrict movement of accredited journalists within the Pentagon through non-secured, unclassified hallways.” Hegseth also said reporters will be required to sign a form to protect sensitive information and would be issued a new badge that more clearly identifies them as press. It was not clear whether signing the form would be a condition of continued access to the building. Two months ago, the department was embarrassed by a leak to The New York Times that billionaire Elon Musk was to get a briefing on the U.S. military’s plans in case a war broke out with China. That briefing never took place, on President Donald Trump’s orders, and Hegseth suspended two Pentagon officials as part of an investigation into how that news got out.


Some of these concerns is tied to Hegseths meeting with Musk that Reuters reported on. Yes some of the allegations here have the same exact issues as the White House had to deal with directly.
Ahead of his first meeting in March, there was a media report that Musk would be briefed on secret war plans for China, something Musk, Trump and others denied. Musk, at the time, called the report "pure propaganda" and urged legal action against leakers. Musk's businesses Starlink and SpaceX already have a number of Pentagon contracts, raising questions about conflicts of interest as he advocates for innovation and re-prioritization of Pentagon spending to find efficiencies.

Like the last time the wire services are getting hit directly when they investigate the Administration in the same way FCC Comissioner Brendan Carr goes after radio and TV station licenses in the FCC.
 

Here is the National Press Club responding to the restrictions on the press issued by the White House and the Pentagon.

“The Department of Defense has taken a significant step to restrict long-standing press access to the Pentagon. A new directive sharply limits where journalists can go, requires escorts for routine movement, and curtails opportunities to engage with officials. These changes raise serious concerns about transparency, oversight, and the public’s right to know.

For generations, journalists have walked the Pentagon’s halls, asking hard questions, documenting history, and helping the public understand the most consequential decisions our government makes. That tradition is now in jeopardy.

Independent, fact-based reporting on the U.S. military isn’t a luxury. It is a necessity. It keeps voters informed, strengthens democratic oversight, and sends a clear message to the world that America stands for openness and accountability. Restricting access doesn’t protect national security. It undermines public trust.

The updated policy marks a stark departure from long-standing norms that balanced operational security with meaningful press access. By blocking access to common areas, restricting movement without escorts, and complicating basic reporting functions, the Pentagon is making it harder for journalists to do their jobs and easier for power to go unchecked.
 
The secretary of defense has now imposed new restrictions on credentialed media covering the pentagon.


If he's so concerned about security, why did he use a non-secure method to hold a conference call? He's more concerned about the American people knowing what he's doing than he us about our enemies.
Then again the Pentagon can do all the press restrictions all he wants but that does not stop the wire services from covering the latest drama in Ukraine as seen here. The wire services found a way to go around the restrictions.



 

Here's part 2 on the motives why the Pentagon issued press restrictions some of it is coming from drama from inside Pete Hegseths office. As always the wire services, Radio and TV has found a way to go around the restrictions.
 


Woah this is one I never considered when the Pentagon Press Restrictions came out. Now OAN has fired one of their correspondents for questioning the press restrictions at the Pentagon and White House. I was thinking it would be Reuters or AFP to file a lawsuit on the Trump Administration in the same way AP did it over the White House Plus Pentagon issuing press restrictions on wire services like AP, Reuters, Bloomberg, and AFP.

OAN chief Pentagon correspondent and former Trump White House staffer Gabrielle Cuccia, who describes herself as a “MAGA girl,” says she was fired from the unabashedly conservative cable news network for criticizing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s restrictions on the press.

Cuccia was hired by OAN after the network took over NBC’s former Pentagon workspace and soon raised concerns about the Defense Department’s increasing limitations on journalists, including locked briefing room doors and a lack of formal press briefings.

“If you want the best case study for the death of the MAGA movement — look no further than the Department of Defense,” Cuccia wrote on her Substack. “If there’s any place where we should be asking questions, demanding transparency and applying pressure — it’s here.”
 

Here's another reason for some of the press restrictions in the White House. Yes it's apparently tied to an alleged leak at the Supreme Court. Again this is a systemic issue hitting the media and it's going from FCC questioning of local radio and TV licenses to getting into confrontations with wire services and public broadcasting in the courts.

We’re going to come after the people in the media”

During a campaign rally soon after the leak, Donald Trump mused about jailing journalists who refuse to share their sources using violent imagery: “You tell the reporter who is it … and if the reporter doesn’t want to tell you it’s ‘bye bye.’ The reporter goes to jail. When the reporter learns he’s going to be married to a certain prisoner that’s extremely strong, tough, and mean, he will say, ‘you know, I think I’m going to give you the information.'” It was just one of a shocking number of comments Trump has made on jailing journalists.

Before he was FBI Director, Kash Patel went on longtime Trump ally Steve Bannon’s podcast to say: “We’re going to come after the people in the media.” The investigation into the Dobbs leak appears to be the first step the FBI is taking to fulfill Patel’s threat, but it’s far from the first salvo in the Trump administration’s war on the press.
 
An appeals court has ruled in favor of the white house in the AP case:


My view is the ruling ignores the actual case, which was that AP was being discriminated against because of its free speech.
 
An appeals court has ruled in favor of the white house in the AP case:


My view is the ruling ignores the actual case, which was that AP was being discriminated against because of its free speech.
True and also the AP was one of the media outlets that got labeled as "Wire Services" along with Reuters, and Bloomberg to justify restricting press access in both White House and the Pentagon.
 


Another news outlet got added to the list of organizations banned from the White House Press Pool and its Wall Street Journal. Yes this was the news outlet I never considered that would be banned from the White House and was considered the outlet least likely to get sued by the Trump Administration. This is tied to the White House suing Wall Street Journal over the Epstein story.
 
What if the big networks with evening newscasts, AP, WSJ, Fox and CNN just quit going to the White House news conferences / press briefings. All or nothing. Complete news blackout of the administration and it's lap dog MEGA politicians. If it's newsworthy just a picture and read the statement. Just simply state "we are afraid if we tell the truth we will get sued". If this happened for a week or two I personally believe Trump's reality TV ego would be crushed. Before the "apprentice hype" he was nothing but a business man bankrupted a couple of casinos.

"Together we stand divided we fall".

I know this will never happen.
 
New media restrictions at the Pentagon:


NBC News, NPR News, and NY Times were removed from the Pentagon in February.

 
New media restrictions at the Pentagon:


NBC News, NPR News, and NY Times were removed from the Pentagon in February.


The second article linked to was published on February 1 of this year. Though it is important (I will explain why in a moment), the first article did come outtoday. Both articles are important because they more completely tie the sitting U.S. President to the currently sitting leader of Hungary who told a convention of conservative Republicans (I believe last year) that the only way to move forward was to develop your own media and give it access to areas that used to be accessed by traditional media. With the exception of The Huffington Post from the second article, all of the"new" media that have moved into the Pentagon spaces occupied by the old media are media developed by the far right to challenge the traditional media. With regard to the first article, I hope one of the media outlets involved is willing to take this to the courts. Trump might win in the U.S. Supreme Court (apparently they like having kings) but the publicity this will cause will further assist those (including yours truly) who consider him to be a dangerous wannabe dictator.
 
The second article linked to was published on February 1 of this year.

Yes I know. I said that in my post.

NBC News, NPR News, and NY Times were removed from the Pentagon in February.

Obviously those companies have still been able to report on the military.

Having a credential really only gets you the ability to ask questions at briefings. But that's official stuff anyway. No real news there.
 
New media restrictions at the Pentagon:


Bloomberg's version:

The US Defense Department is requiring journalists agree to submit anything they publish about it for government approval as a condition of access https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...urnalists-allow-government-to-vet-information
 
It'll be interesting to see how the major news organizations respond. I expect that they, as a group, will refuse. They'll pack up, walk our, and continue to cover the pentagon without their permission. We'll see what happens in the morning. This is no way to treat the press if you want to get positive coverage.
 
NBC News, NPR News, and NY Times were removed from the Pentagon in February.
They were not removed from access; they were just not given one of the very small spaces in the old press office.
 
Or rather, they were told to vacate the space they had, so it could be given to someone else.
That's what I said. They were no longer given the space in the little press office that they once had.
 
It'll be interesting to see how the major news organizations respond. I expect that they, as a group, will refuse. They'll pack up, walk our, and continue to cover the pentagon without their permission. We'll see what happens in the morning. This is no way to treat the press if you want to get positive coverage.

As I think more about this, it's pretty common for beat reporters (pentagon, white house, etc) to inform their media contacts at those places that they're about to publish a controversial story, and to ask for comment. It's not uncommon for those contacts to either not respond or not give a comment, and that's reported as part of the story. So in that way, most of the top reporters are already letting them know in advance. The difference here is they're giving the pentagon a right of approval that (afaik) no one else gets. Asking for comment is very different from asking for permission. There have been occasions I know of where a media contact has asked a reporter to hold a story for one reason or another. But this may be asking for too much. This is giving the government editorial control over the news.
 
Last edited:
On Sunday, the president was asked about the new pentagon media restrictions:

 


Back
Top Bottom