• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

The Eagle

Everyone in radio has a huge ego. It takes one to step in front of a mic and talk to hundreds of thousands of people you'll never see. Confidence and ego go hand-in-hand.

It's when you attempt to denigrate others, that your ego writes checks that your reputation has to cash.

And, at some point, your ego can cost you more than you were willing to pay.

Just a thought. Or three.
 
Nigel Tufnel said:
Personally, I think TRIUMPH SUCKS. However, that is my opinion. I also feel that if the EAGLE is going to come back and do things right... they need to have some damn CRUNCH to their station. They will get this with PANTERA and other bands along those lines. Not in heavy rotation... but they still have to have it. I mean.... THEY ARE A DALLAS BAND AFTER ALL and a VERY POPULAR ONE as well.

White Zombie ("More Human Than Human" - Remix) or Dream Theater ("The Mirror" / "Lie") would be a good way to kick off the Hour !

Regarding Pantera:

"THEY ARE A DALLAS BAND AFTER ALL and a VERY POPULAR ONE as well."

The Steve Miller Band is from Dallas too, and quite popular, he even has a song with "Eagle" in the title.... But pleeeze, I do not want to hear him on KEGL just because of that ! !

I wouldn't want to hear most of Megadeth's schlop on the Eagle either.....

But...selected Megadeth tracks like "Symphony Of Destruction" and "Train Of Consequences" would be nice to hear...

"Artist" selection.... is only the Beginning, of formatting a Rock station that is other than just another Top 40 station, and all of the junk that comes with that!!

It's the songs you do *not* play, as well as the songs you do play, that give the station it's credibility, or lack thereof... Somehwere in the range from Totally Commerical -- to Totally Eclectic, there is a ROCK crediblility that is direly and sorely absent from the Metroplex.
 
Neanderpaul said:
Everyone in radio has a huge ego.

No that's not true. There are some radio people who don't have egos. Jim Zippo is one of them.

R
 
Neanderpaul said:
Everyone in radio has a huge ego. It takes one to step in front of a mic and talk to hundreds of thousands of people you'll never see. Confidence and ego go hand-in-hand.

It's when you attempt to denigrate others, that your ego writes checks that your reputation has to cash.

And, at some point, your ego can cost you more than you were willing to pay.

Just a thought. Or three.


I have to respectfully disagree on that. Not everyone has an ego. Many do.... but not everyone. Confidence can be mistaken for ego.
 
Nigel Tufnel said:
I have to respectfully disagree on that. Not everyone has an ego. Many do.... but not everyone. Confidence can be mistaken for ego.

Everyone has an ego. (according to Freud) It's how you choose to express it. Ego is the outward appearance of personality traits. "Confidence" is merely a euphemism. We, in radio, all wish to be accepted from afar. Somewhere back when, or perhaps now, there exists a social imbalance that drives us to do this. The ego is what allows us the comfort level of being able to stand in a room, with nothing more than a microphone, and engage in the "please love me" business. Which is what radio has always been. We're all politicians, campaigning for the public favor. One must possess a certain level of ego, above that of our peers, in order to not fear the scrutiny of the unseen. We know it's out there. Every time we crack that mic, someone hates what we say. But the ego blocks that out.

It's not really what you say, or do...It's how you say, or do it. The ego is a tool, and must be used properly, and managed when necessary.

Keeping the ego in check....there is the real skill in what we do. None of us should ever badmouth the professional abilities of our peers. The line is crossed when constructive criticism becomes destructive nitpicking. We're all guilty from time to time. It's part of that suppressed insecurity that drives all radio clowns. Denial of this facet of our personality disorder leads one to embrace the vitriol, and then leads others to categorize one as having a huge ego. More accurately..being unable to keep your ego in check.

The urban philosopher Chuck D once said:

"Don't believe the hype."

And Mommy always said: "If you don't have anything nice to say..."

Meanwhile...with regard to Pantera;

The band, not unlike Nirvana, seem to have been elevated to a higher status due to the unfortunate death of a member. People forget that Nirvana were on the verge of implosion before Cobain checked himself out. They also had been releasing CDs for a couple of years that failed miserably, and nobody cared about until he died. "In Utero" was not well-received overall, and was a regression. They snagged lightning in a bottle when "Nevermind" caught the public's mind. Had they not copped the Pixies' style for that once-in-a-career album...they'd have been like most of the other also-ran club bands that slogged it out night after night. Pantera's best work was done prior to 1997, and for all intents & purposes, they were in the "also-ran" category prior to Dime's murder. Most of their music doesn't test. And it's really more of an image band than anything. So, it's no suprise that their music doesn't get played more. The legend of Pantera, just like the legend of certain radio stations, far exceed their actual relevance.

That's not to say a properly executed Rock station couldn't re-introduce Pantera to the masses and get them to click.

Again, I still believe in the power of the "radio guy." When I was a kid, if my favorite radio DJ said something was solid, I trusted him/her because they established that they were credible.

It can still be done. And, in fact, is being done at stations all over America.
 
Oh brother... ::)

Well if you go by that logic, than why limit it to "Everyone in radio has a huge ego"? How about "Everyone has a huge ego"?

R
 
There is nothing wrong with having a huge ego. The problem is having a huge ego with no talent which describes
the on-air talent in the Dallas market.
 
RADIO TRUTH said:
There is nothing wrong with having a huge ego. The problem is having a huge ego with no talent which describes
the on-air talent in the Dallas market.

Well speaking of Ego's, look who just showed up ;)

R
 
Robert Bass said:
Oh brother... ::)

Well if you go by that logic, than why limit it to "Everyone in radio has a huge ego"? How about "Everyone has a huge ego"?

R

And, to make our local Freudian, Jungian, Skinnerized pundit happy... everyone in radio also has red blood cells, body odor, working mental facilities (I didn't say a great one) and a decent mode of transportation, even if it is their mom that has to be woken out of bed so they can make morning drive. ;D

In other words, you know dang well what was meant. Your definition out of WebMD was appreciated however.
 
VERITAS DE VOCE said:
And, to make our local Freudian, Jungian, Skinnerized pundit happy... everyone in radio also has red blood cells, body odor, working mental facilities (I didn't say a great one) and a decent mode of transportation, even if it is their mom that has to be woken out of bed so they can make morning drive. ;D

In other words, you know dang well what was meant. Your definition out of WebMD was appreciated however.


I know exactly what was meant. I'm merely pointing out that "big ego" and "a**hole" are not the same thing.

And plagiarism has never been my thing.
 
rebelrawker83 said:
I never claimed to know it all. What amazes "me" is the fact that you claim to have read everything posted thus far, and you cannot see Fozzie's "tude". Again, since you obviously did NOT read what I wrote...I was speaking more of Fozzie's unwillingness to learn.

Hold it!

You are proving our point here.... You claim he isn't willing to learn, but yet he has stated he IS willing to learn.

R
 
RADIO TRUTH said:
There is nothing wrong with having a huge ego. The problem is having a huge ego with no talent which describes
the on-air talent in the Dallas market.

Again you are just repeating the same old thing you've beaten to death already. I would imagine the talent in this market doesn't appreciate it. And yes, there IS talent in this market.

R
 
In response to Nigel.......

I never claimed to know it all. What amazes "me" is the fact that you claim to have read everything posted thus far, and you cannot see Fozzie's "tude". Again, since you obviously did NOT read what I wrote...I was speaking more of Fozzie's unwillingness to learn. I then said I was thinking of someone else when I mentioned ego. Yes, I can see where I was unclear when making that statement and Fozzie thought I was referring to him. I forget sometimes that when typing on these things, people cannot see into my head and what I am thinking.That is why I clarified what I meant. So YOU will understand what I mean when I say ego...I am referring to jocks who believe that people will listen just because said jock is talking on a mic. I am referring to jocks who know nothing of the music they play and make no attempt to learn because they believe their mere presence is reason enough for a listener to tune in. I agree with Paul that everyone has ego in some form or another. I also believe you must have some sort of confidence/brain disorder to be able to talk to thousands of people at a time. ;D It is probably the latter. I believe ego becomes an issue on air when a jock forgets that they are fallible...that learning is a continuous process...and being on air is about relating to the listener. "We" are a guest in their life...not vice versa.
 
rebelrawker83 said:
You are soooooooooooo reaching. You cannot read what the guy wrote in previous posts and honestly say he is willing to learn. After he had his butt handed to him by others, he came back with the "willing to learn" line. The guy was full of piss and vinegar until he realized his arguments were being torn to shreds. He used the "willing to learn" as a comeback. Sorry...but I don't buy it.

Then take it outside...

R
 
RADIO TRUTH said:
There is nothing wrong with having a huge ego. The problem is having a huge ego with no talent which describes
the on-air talent in the Dallas market.

There is PLENTY of talent in this market. Mike Shannon gave us a list awhile back.

R
 
RADIO TRUTH said:
Talent in Dallas versus real personality djs is like comparing the Olive Garden to real Italian food.

I always thought that the Olive Garden purveyed real Italian food, oh contrarian roboposter.
 
RADIO TRUTH said:
Talent in Dallas versus real personality djs is like comparing the Olive Garden to real Italian food.

I'm sure all the talent in this market appreciates your candor. I know I do.... NOT!

R
 
RADIO TRUTH said:
Talent in Dallas versus real personality djs is like comparing the Olive Garden to real Italian food.

Hey Truth...

I work in the Dallas market. It isn't important who I am. But, I'm with a successful station. We have a loyal, satisfied fanbase that are very pleased with our product. It ain't the biggest audience... but THEY are entertained. That is why I got into the business.

If the people that make up Dallas radio are so unskilled and bad at what they do... THEN STOP LISTENING. There are PLENTY of alternatives. Buy an XM or Sirius radio... Buy an IPod... load it full of whatever niche music that is ignored by the city's radio companies and shut the **** up. Load it full of airchecks of whatever radio DJ makes you happy. Get on the internet and listen there.

Otherwise, WE GET IT. You are a broken record. WE GET IT... you don't like the DJs. WE GET IT... they aren't playing the music you like. WE GET IT. Shut up. You are an annoyance. Please.... just turn it off.

While I don't agree with everything I read on these message boards, at least it all comes from a passion these people have for their stations. You sir... are just a negative nelly. And it's the worst kind of negative... you're being negative... for the sake of being negative. It's not constructive. It's not useful. You aren't useful.
 
What makes you think that I have the tolerance to listen to Dallas radio at all? What makes you think that I am not a broadcaster or consultant just voicing an opinion? My disdain for Dallas radio does not stand alone. I have
much disdain for radio across the U. S. Dallas happens to be particularly amateurish in relationship to its market size but, overall the problem is not so much Dallas but, the erosion and slow death of radio on a national basis.
This is why all broadcasting stocks are in the toilet. Once upon a time, talent was needed to be on-the-air but, those days are long past. Listening to current radio djs read liner cards and promos does not equate to talent. Any idiot can do it. Let every radio station get rid of all liner cards and promos and make all the djs have to adlib
over every song they play and we'll see how good they are. Current formats don't require any real talent. Voicetrack the stations or automate them and nobody would know the difference. There is one dj who does adlib
his whole show. He is the clown on Saturday nights on KAAM. Unfortunately, he has no ability and not enough literacy to come close to sounding like a major market dj. It would be interesting to see how many local djs could
sound entertaining and have personality while talking over every song without the use of liner cards and promos.
I am comparing current djs to what music djs had to do in the 60s.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom