• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

"Satellite in Trouble as HD Grows"

zumahans said:
IBOCRocks said:

Quoting David Eduardo, I see.

Wow, another good one! I'm going to have to leave...I'm just way outclassed by comments like that!

I'm stunned by your show of intelligence! :D
 

Wow, another good one! I'm going to have to leave...I'm just way outclassed by comments like that!

I'm stunned by your show of intelligence! :D
[/quote]

yeah, this is easy, a gift.
 
zumahans said:
yeah, this is easy, a gift.

Yeah, reading your posts, it's obvious that you're "gifted".

In a Special Olympics sort of way...
 
Reading zumahans' postings carefully I can't help but realize that he is yet another example of the growing number of broadcast professionals who have become disillusioned with HD/IBOC, Ubiquitous cartel/business practices and the awful lie that HD radio is going to "save" free terrestrial broadcasting.

Nothing but good programming produced by talented people will save free terrestrial broadcasting. Somewhere along the way, while the larger radio broadcasting companies were buying up every radio station in sight, the industry has forgotten how to do that.

Technical solutions will NOT solve programming (or people) problems. zumahan realizes this.
 
"Technical solutions will NOT solve programming (or people) problems. zumahan realizes this." I agree that a station needs talent to attract an audience. However, improved technical quality is also a must. I love the anti IBOC crowd who discount technical improvements by stating that technical alone won't help broadcasters. Other than the music streams much of what the competition provides is re-broadcasts of content produced by old line broadcasters, be they network or syndicated sources. The I-Pod isn't a great source for talent yet it does very well competing for it's audience share. IBOC is progressing nicely and the next few months will be very interesting as more radios come on line. The fact that more manufacturers are producing the radios, especially in this economy is a very good sign for the technology.
 
I.B. Iquity declared:

I agree that a station needs talent to attract an audience. However, improved technical quality is also a must. I love the anti IBOC crowd who discount technical improvements by stating that technical alone won't help broadcasters.

Well, it won't! And it is very debatable as to whether or not IBOC is really a technical "improvement", and if it is, whether or not the public is actually interested enough in it to spend money on it.

Other than the music streams much of what the competition provides is re-broadcasts of content produced by old line broadcasters, be they network or syndicated sources. The I-Pod isn't a great source for talent yet it does very well competing for it's audience share.

The I-Pod phenomenon has absolutely nothing to do with HDradio or broadcasting. That device is popular because people like to have THEIR music portable and available at their fingertips.

IBOC is progressing nicely and the next few months will be very interesting as more radios come on line. The fact that more manufacturers are producing the radios, especially in this economy is a very good sign for the technology.

Maybe future generations of these receivers produced by a wider array of manufacturers will work better than they have thus far. It is no secret that I am very disappointed with the BA Receptor. I have two of them. They were both returned to the factory for "repair". One of them had a sensitivity issue. "No problem" was found with it and it was returned. The other one forgot how to boot up. That unit was replaced and it has the same sensitivity issue that the first one has.

The fact is, I cannot listen to the HDradio carriers of my most favorite AM radio stations in my market. This is very disappointing, to say the least.
 
"ell, it won't!"

What do you base this on?

"And it is very debatable as to whether or not IBOC is really a technical "improvement", and if it is, whether or not the public is actually interested enough in it to spend money on it."

The same can be said for any new technology. The only way we will know is to put it out there and see how the public responds. At this point it seems the most anti I-BOC group are those with opposing interests. They aren't honest players in all this.
"The I-Pod phenomenon has absolutely nothing to do with HDradio or broadcasting. That device is popular because people like to have THEIR music portable and available at their fingertips."

I must disagree with you. I-PODS, computers etc are all competition for Radio. They provide entertainment and information alternatives and so must be considered competitors. Why do you think many of todays broadcasters are now providing their product as Podcasts?

"The fact is, I cannot listen to the HDradio carriers of my most favorite AM radio stations in my market. This is very disappointing, to say the least"


Why is that? What market are you in where IBOC has made it impossible for you to listen to your local stations? If your favorites are out of market that's something else. This all sounds like the lament of the DXer to me.
 
I.B.Iquity wrote: "IBOC is progressing nicely and the next few months will be very interesting as more radios come on line. The fact that more manufacturers are producing the radios, especially in this economy is a very good sign for the technology."

The stations can broadcast away, but no one is listening - with the poor rankings on Amazon for all HD radios, the public, thus far, has shown no interest and nothing will change that fact. Fact is, as the Bridge Ratings show, Wireless Internet and Internet Radio far exceeds HD Radio, and will continue to do so, growing many many more times popular than HD Radio in the future, Wait until Wi-Max brings Internet Radio to portable devices and automobiles in 2008 - HD Radio will receive its death blow.
 
SayNoToIBOC said:
I.B.Iquity wrote: "IBOC is progressing nicely and the next few months will be very interesting as more radios come on line. The fact that more manufacturers are producing the radios, especially in this economy is a very good sign for the technology."

The stations can broadcast away, but no one is listening - with the poor rankings on Amazon for all HD radios, the public, thus far, has shown no interest and nothing will change that fact. Fact is, as the Bridge Ratings show, Wireless Internet and Internet Radio far exceeds HD Radio, and will continue to do so, growing many many more times popular than HD Radio in the future, Wait until Wi-Max brings Internet Radio to portable devices and automobiles in 2008 - HD Radio will receive its death blow.

WiMAX won't be widely available in 2008, period. Radio? Available everywhere. So internet radio will exceed HD radio...so what? HD Radio will still be there. Nobody said that HD radio had to be the most listened to thing in the history of mankind.

So really, what is your point? Other than trying to fan fires that don't exist?

Must be some more of that secret "CIA" training you have! :D
 
Actually, I wish someone would contact the CIA in DC and tell them that one of their operatives is exposing himself on a message board OR that someone is misidentifying himself as a CIA employee. I'm sure they wouldn't be very happy in either case and may take messures to stop this. Just a thought.
 
I.B. Iquity said:
Actually, I wish someone would contact the CIA in DC and tell them that one of their operatives is exposing himself on a message board OR that someone is misidentifying himself as a CIA employee. I'm sure they wouldn't be very happy in either case and may take messures to stop this. Just a thought.

Sort of like his famous:

"Reported to management"

:D

For someone who is supposedly a high-level preogrammer/government contractor, he sure acts like a child.

This is the part where he says "So what, the Receptor is at 9,216!". I tell you, he has a BAD case of ADD.
 
"I tell you, he has a BAD case of ADD."

I tell you I had a calculator once which had a bad case of Add, Subtract, Divide AND Multiply!!!
 
I.B. Iquity said:
"I tell you, he has a BAD case of ADD."

I tell you I had a calculator once which had a bad case of Add, Subtract, Divide AND Multiply!!!

I gave mine some Pi, and it got better.

;)
 
"Actually, I wish someone would contact the CIA in DC and tell them that one of their operatives is exposing himself on a message board OR that someone is misidentifying himself as a CIA employee. I'm sure they wouldn't be very happy in either case and may take messures to stop this. Just a thought."

Go for it !

"WiMAX won't be widely available in 2008, period. Radio? Available everywhere. So internet radio will exceed HD radio...so what? HD Radio will still be there. Nobody said that HD radio had to be the most listened to thing in the history of mankind."

It means a lot - it will kill any chances of growth with HD Radio ! :D


"
 
SayNoToIBOC said:
"Actually, I wish someone would contact the CIA in DC and tell them that one of their operatives is exposing himself on a message board OR that someone is misidentifying himself as a CIA employee. I'm sure they wouldn't be very happy in either case and may take messures to stop this. Just a thought."

Go for it !

"WiMAX won't be widely available in 2008, period. Radio? Available everywhere. So internet radio will exceed HD radio...so what? HD Radio will still be there. Nobody said that HD radio had to be the most listened to thing in the history of mankind."

It means a lot - it will kill any chances of growth with HD Radio ! :D


"

Then why are you here fighting it? I know...because you know you're wrong! :D
 
Because, the public needs to be aware of HD Radio's flawed and fraudulent "technology".
 
SayNoToIBOC said:
Because, the public needs to be aware of HD Radio's flawed and fraudulent "technology".

Yeah, but nobody believes you. You've not only admitted to misleading people to try and keep them from IBOC, you've been caught lying several times. The only reason I still mess with you is because it's easy and fun to make you look like a fool - though you do a pretty good job of that with your "Amazon Updates"!

:D
 
My posts are true and factual, backed up by articles/links.
 
SayNoToIBOC said:
My posts are true and factual, backed up by articles/links.

No, your posts are filled with lies about 7-foot dipoles (and references to "eulogies") and links to opinion pieces and blogs disguised as facts.

The only time you tell the truth is when you post an Amazon ranking, and unfortunately nobody cares! :D

It's pretty telling that even people on your own side are telling you to stop.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom